Evaluation of soil reclamation needs should be done by existed agricultural and economical parameters, but also new ecological ones have to be introduced. There are not any solid criteria for negative drainage impact on environment evaluation so far. Therefore, the aim of this work was to suggest possible criteria for thoroughgoing evaluation of soil drainage suitability. According to suggested criteria, threshold values of soil drainage suitability are introduced. In the field "Orlača" eugley soil shouldn’t be drained, whereas fluvisol and semigley are partly suitable for drainage. .Vrednovanje meliorativnog područja trebalo bi da pored postojećih poljoprivrednih i ekonomskih uključi i ekološke parametre. S obzirom da do danas ne postoj čvrsti kriterijumi za sagledavanje negativnih uticaja mera odvodnjavanja na životnu sredinu, u radu su predloženi mogući kriterijumi za sveobuhvatno vrednovanje pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje. Na osnovu predloženih kriterijuma uvedeni su pragovi pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje. Pokazano je da močvarno-glejno zemljište područja "Orlača" ne treba odvodnjavati, dok su aluvijalno i livadsko zemljište uslovno pogodna za odvodnjavanje. 

Djurović, Nevenka

Rudić, Dragan

Stričević, Ružica

Zemljiste i biljka

English

AgroSpace

Ecological Evaluation Criteria of Soil Suitability for Drainage 
 
Rudić D., Nevenka Đurović and Ružica Stričević1 
 
Faculty of agriculture, University of Belgrade 
Nemanjina 6, 11080 Zemum 
 
Rudić D., Nevenka Đurović and Ružica Stričević (2006): Ecological Evaluation Criteria 
of Soil Suitability for Drainage. Zemljište i biljka, Vol.   No      
 Evaluation of soil reclamation needs should be done by existed agricultural and 
economical parameters, but also new ecological ones have to be introduced. There are not 
any solid criteria for negative drainage impact on environment evaluation so far. 
Therefore, the aim of this work was to suggest possible criteria for thoroughgoing 
evaluation of soil drainage suitability. According to suggested criteria, threshold values 
of soil drainage suitability are introduced. In the field “Orlača” eugley soil shouldn’t be 
drained, whereas fluvisol and semigley are partly suitable for drainage.  
 Key words: drainage, ecological assessment 
 
  
Introduction 
 
 
1 Corresponding Author: Ružica Strićević, Faculty of Agriculure, University of Belgrade, Zemun, 
Nemanjina 6, 11080 
Ecological evaluation of the soil suitability for drainage based on ecological 
parameters should become a permanent criterion of drainage projects. The criteria that 
include both ecological evaluation of the drainage  project and agricultural assessment 
havenot been established so far. The aim of this work was to propose some criteria for 
soil suitability for drainage using the sample region Orlača for three type of 
hydromorphic soils. 
 
General Characteristics of the Research Region 
 
There are three type of soil on the research region Orlača with total area of 1650 ha. 
On the lowest part of the region and longitudinal depressions is eugley type of soil on the 
parent leached marshy soil. On the higher part of the region – ledges is noncalcareous 
vertisolic semigley meadow black type of soil. On the part of the region conecting the 
riverside is loamy, deep calcareous fluvisol  type of soil. Present productive value of the 
soils are significantly reduced due to high water table depth waterlogging zone of root 
system during the most period of year (autumn – winter-spring) on fluvisol and vertisolic 
semigley, whereas eugley is waterlogged mostly all over the year. Potential productive 
value of the soils are very high. 
Research area is grown by following type of vegetation, tipical for wet land: marshy 
vegetation, low land meadow and forest vegetation. Cincovic (1956) researched that 
region and found out following phytocenoses: Schoenoplectus llacuster – Pragmites 
communes; Tuphoides arundinacea; Bolboschoenus maritimus; Eleocharis palustris, 
zatim asocijacije Agrostideto iuncetum effisi, Molinietum coeruleae. Dolinske livade su 
predstavljene tipovima: Cynodontetum, asocijacijama Brometocynosuretum cristati, 
Trifolium pallidum – Alopecurus protensis; Polygonum bistrorta – Poa trivialis. Forest 
vegetation is consisted of willow, poplar and oak (Tanasijević et al., 1966).  
Conventional approach of the land suitability for improvement usually is based on soil 
physical, hydrological and chemical properties. Obtained results are analyzed in order to 
propose specific works on the each marked area of the region usually shown on the map 
that can lead to soil fertility and productivity increment. Limiting factors regarding 
environmental protection has not been considered in this approach. 
To harmonize the need of modern agriculture with the principles of environmental 
protection, new criteria of soil suitability for drainage that include some additional 
parameters that limits drainage in some regions are proposed in this work. 
Some possible criteria that could be used for environmental assessment and soil 
suitability for drainage is presented in Table 1. 
 
Table 1 Suggested criteria for evaluation of soil for drainage 
+  Criteria which support drainage  Sign 
+ 
➢ Excess water and its duration  
− waterlogged soil throughout the year and every year 
− waterlogged soil half of the year and every year 
− short seasonal occurrence of excess water  
 
*** 
** 
* 
➢ Soil fertility and productive capacity 
− non-tilled soil – autochthonous vegetation 
− arable land suitable for crop production 
− arable land suitable for orchards and vineyards  
 
* 
** 
*** 
➢ Soil fertility   
− eugley 
− meadow soil 
 
**** 
**** 
**** 
− alluvium 
− black marsh soil 
− peat soil 
− pseudogley 
− vertisol 
− saline, sodic soil and arenosol 
*** 
*** 
** 
** 
* 
➢ Economic criterion based on cost/benefit ratio 
− cost/benefit  1 
− cost/benefit = 1 
− cost/benefit  1 
 
****
* 
*** 
 -  
 -  Criteria which support environmental protection Sign  
- 
➢ High quality forest vegetation 
− common oak, ash 300 – 500 trees / ha 
− common oak, ash < 300 trees  / ha 
− elm, poplar, willow  300 – 500 trees / ha 
− elm, poplar, willow <  300  trees / ha 
 
*** 
 ** 
*** 
** 
➢ Coppice vegetation 
− field maple, hawthorn  
− common dogwood, viburnum, amorpha 
− other 
 
** 
* 
- 
➢  Protective role of vegetation 
− flood control 
− windbreaks to control wind erosion 
 
** 
* 
➢ Wildlife protection 
➢ wildlife  - protected by law  
                             -  economically valuable species 
                             -  unthreatened species 
➢ Birds  - protected by law 
  - economically valuable bird species 
- unthreatened species 
➢ Other animal species protected by law 
 
*** 
** 
 - 
*** 
** 
 -  
*** 
 
 
 
 Results of applied ecological evaluation of the soil suitability for drainage on Orlača 
region 
 
Soil suitability for drainage of region Orlača  shown in Table 2 is based on thorough 
analysis of both agronomical and environmental aspects. 
➢ Criterion/Type of soil Eugley Semigley Alluvium 
➢ Water excess and its duration criterion 
− waterlogged soil throughout the year and 
every year 
− waterlogged soil half of the year and 
every year 
− short seasonal occurrence of excess 
water 
waterlogged 
soil 
throughout 
the year and 
every year 
(***) 
waterlogged 
soil half of 
the year and 
every year 
 (**) 
short 
seasonal 
occurrence 
of excess 
water  
(*) 
➢ Soil fertility and productive capacity 
− non-tilled soil – autochthonous 
vegetation 
− arable land suitable for crop production 
− arable land suitable for orchards and 
vineyards 
 
Non tilled 
soil 
 (*) 
Arable land 
suitable for 
crop 
production 
(**) 
Arable land 
suitable for 
orchards and 
vineyards 
(**) 
➢ Soil Fertility criterion 
− eugley 
− semigley 
− alluvium 
eugley (****) semigley 
(****) 
alluvium 
(****) 
➢ Economic criterion based on cost/benefit 
ratio 
− Cost/benefit (B/C)  1 
− Cost/benefit  (B/C) = 1 
− Cost/benefit  (B/C)  1 
B/C = 1 (***) B/C  1 
(*****) 
B/C  1 
(*****) 
Criteria which support environmental protection    
➢ High quality forest vegetation 
− common oak, ash 300 – 500 trees / ha 
− common oak, ash < 300 trees  / ha 
− elm, poplar, willow  300 – 500 trees / ha 
− elm, poplar, willow <  300  trees / ha  
Present asoc. 
Populetum i 
Salicetum 
(**) 
     
    - 
  
     - 
➢ Coppice vegetation 
− field maple, hawthorn  
− common dogwood, viburnum, amorpha 
− other  
     - Field maple 
hawthorn, 
acacia, other 
(**) 
 
➢ Protective role of vegetation 
− flood control 
− windbreaks to control wind erosion  
Flood 
protective 
vegetation 
(**) 
 
  - 
 
  - 
➢ Wildlife protection 
➢ wildlife  - protected by law  
                 -  economically valuable species 
                 -  unthreatened species 
➢ Birds  - protected by law 
  - economically valuable bird species 
- unthreatened species 
➢ Other animal species protected by law  
N1 
 
 
 
(***) 
 
 
(***) 
N2 
 
 
 
(***) 
 
 
(***) 
N3 
 
 
 
(***) 
 
 
(**) 
Sum + 11 / -10 +13 / -8 +12 / -5 
 
 
 
Near the research region there is Obedska bara – bird refuge park protected both 
by national and international Law (Fig. 1). It represent natural living place for autochtone 
species protected by Law suc as: Insecta, Amphibia, Reptila , class of  Hirudinea and 
Mollusca (Sl. glasnik SRS 11/90 i Sl. glasnik R. Srbije 49/91). 
 
 
Fig. 1 Geographic position of the research region 
 
Eventhough waterlogging does not cause such a huge problem  as in eugley one, 
this type of soil is also suitable living place of protected flora and fauna.  
 
 Part of the region where alluvium soil is dominant is already partly  drained and 
cultivated. Special preservation should be given to those species protected by the Law, 
but only near meander of river Sava. 
 Suggested criteria has been qualified and summed for each type of soil as positive 
(criteria which favouraze drainage) and negative value (which favouraze environmental 
conservations).  Summed values are shown in Fig. 2. 
  
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Criteria
V
al
u
e 
o
f 
cr
it
er
ia
Euglej
Semiglej
Aluvijum
non 
suitable
partly 
suitable
suitable
 
Fig. 2 Evaluation soil suitability for drainage on the Orlača region 
First part of the curves as well as their maximal values represent usual approach 
of evaluation of soil suitability for drainage. Adding of all coefficients, maximal value 
obtained for semigley soil is 13, for alluvium 12 and for marshy gley (eugley) soil 11. 
Criteria which support environmental protection are presented on the decreasing part of 
the curve. Fig. 2 showed that drainage limitation is the most significant on the eugley 
type of soil. The last points of the curves represent the final values which comprise all the 
information both of positive and negative aspects of drainage. It is very delicate to find 
out scalar value that can be taken as a limit value for determining of total soil suitability 
for drainage. Possible limit values of 4 and 8 are proposed in this work. Those limit 
values define 3 zones: zone suitable for drainage would be when sum of all coefficients 
of  criteria are    8, zone 2 means that soils are  partly suitable for drainage, and   sum of 
all coefficients of  criteria are 4  criteria   8, and zone 3 means that soils are not 
suitable for drainage and sum of all coefficients of  criteria are  4. 
 Using suggested criteria, eugley type of soil on Orlača region is not suitable for 
drainage. Thorough analysis of positive and negative aspects of drainage showed that 
alluvium and semigley soils falls into zone 2, meaning that are partly suitable for 
drainage. Special care has to be done including some additional criteria during the design 
procedure. Final result should be made in a compromise between agricultural and 
environmental requirements. Respecting restriction for drainage on semigley and 
alluvium, final drainage system design for Orlača region should be changed. Adopted 
drainage system design respecting the environmental requirements is shown in second 
part of the work. 
 
Conclusion 
 
Evaluation of soil suitability has to include agricultural, economical and ecological 
parameters. Suggested parameters came out after exhaustive analysis of all positive and 
negative effects that can be caused by drainage. Evaluation of soils in Orlača region for 
drainage suitability showed that marshy gely (eugley) type of soil may be considered 
unfavorable for drainage, whereas meadow soil (semigley) and alluvium are partly 
suitable. 
 
References 
 
1. Cincović T., (1956) - Močvarna vegetacija u Posavini. Zbornik radova 
Poljoprivrednog fakulteta. Sv. 1 Beograd, 1956 
2. Tanasijević Đ., Antonović G., Aleksić N., Pavićević N., Filipović Đ., Spasojević 
M. (1966) – Pedološki pokrivač Zapadne i Severozapadne Srbije. Izd. Institut za 
proučavanje zemljišta u Topčideru. Beograd 1966. 
3. Službeni glasnik SRS br. 11/90. 
4. Službeni glasnik R. Srbije br. 49/91. 
5. Rudić D., Stričević R., Đurović N., 2000 – Melioracije zemljišta uskla|ene sa 
očuvanjem životne sredine, II. Prethodni rad. 
Kriterijum procene  pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje sa stanovišta 
očuvanja životne sredine 
 
Rudić D., Nevenka Đurović and Ružica Stričević1 
 
 
 
Rezime 
 
Vrednovanje meliorativnog područja trebalo bi da pored postojećih poljoprivrednih i 
ekonomskih uključi i ekološke parametre. S obzirom da do danas ne postoj čvrsti 
kriterijumi za sagledavanje negativnih uticaja mera odvodnjavanja na životnu sredinu, u 
radu su predloženi mogući kriterijumi za sveobuhvatno vrednovanje pogodnosti zemljišta 
za odvodnjavanje. Na osnovu predloženih kriterijuma uvedeni su pragovi pogodnosti 
zemljišta za odvodnjavanje. Pokazano je da močvarno-glejno zemljište područja “Orlača” 
ne treba odvodnjavati, dok  su aluvijalno i  livadsko zemljište uslovno pogodna za 
odvodnjavanje.  
 
Ključne reči: odvodnjavanje, ekologija 
 
1 Corresponding Author: Ružica Strićević, Faculty of Agriculure, University of Belgrade, Zemun, 
Nemanjina 6, 11080 
 


Kriterijum procene pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje sa stanovišta očuvanja životne sredine

Ecological Evaluation Criteria of Soil Suitability for Drainage  Rudić D., Nevenka Đurović and Ružica Stričević1  Faculty of agriculture, University of Belgrade Nemanjina 6, 11080 Zemum  Rudić D., Nevenka Đurović and Ružica Stričević (2006): Ecological Evaluation Criteria of Soil Suitability for Drainage. Zemljište i biljka, Vol.   No       Evaluation of soil reclamation needs should be done by existed agricultural and economical parameters, but also new ecological ones have to be introduced. There are not any solid criteria for negative drainage impact on environment evaluation so far. Therefore, the aim of this work was to suggest possible criteria for thoroughgoing evaluation of soil drainage suitability. According to suggested criteria, threshold values of soil drainage suitability are introduced. In the field “Orlača” eugley soil shouldn’t be drained, whereas fluvisol and semigley are partly suitable for drainage.   Key words: drainage, ecological assessment    Introduction   1 Corresponding Author: Ružica Strićević, Faculty of Agriculure, University of Belgrade, Zemun, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Ecological evaluation of the soil suitability for drainage based on ecological parameters should become a permanent criterion of drainage projects. The criteria that include both ecological evaluation of the drainage  project and agricultural assessment havenot been established so far. The aim of this work was to propose some criteria for soil suitability for drainage using the sample region Orlača for three type of hydromorphic soils.  General Characteristics of the Research Region  There are three type of soil on the research region Orlača with total area of 1650 ha. On the lowest part of the region and longitudinal depressions is eugley type of soil on the parent leached marshy soil. On the higher part of the region – ledges is noncalcareous vertisolic semigley meadow black type of soil. On the part of the region conecting the riverside is loamy, deep calcareous fluvisol  type of soil. Present productive value of the soils are significantly reduced due to high water table depth waterlogging zone of root system during the most period of year (autumn – winter-spring) on fluvisol and vertisolic semigley, whereas eugley is waterlogged mostly all over the year. Potential productive value of the soils are very high. Research area is grown by following type of vegetation, tipical for wet land: marshy vegetation, low land meadow and forest vegetation. Cincovic (1956) researched that region and found out following phytocenoses: Schoenoplectus llacuster – Pragmites communes; Tuphoides arundinacea; Bolboschoenus maritimus; Eleocharis palustris, zatim asocijacije Agrostideto iuncetum effisi, Molinietum coeruleae. Dolinske livade su predstavljene tipovima: Cynodontetum, asocijacijama Brometocynosuretum cristati, Trifolium pallidum – Alopecurus protensis; Polygonum bistrorta – Poa trivialis. Forest vegetation is consisted of willow, poplar and oak (Tanasijević et al., 1966).  Conventional approach of the land suitability for improvement usually is based on soil physical, hydrological and chemical properties. Obtained results are analyzed in order to propose specific works on the each marked area of the region usually shown on the map that can lead to soil fertility and productivity increment. Limiting factors regarding environmental protection has not been considered in this approach. To harmonize the need of modern agriculture with the principles of environmental protection, new criteria of soil suitability for drainage that include some additional parameters that limits drainage in some regions are proposed in this work. Some possible criteria that could be used for environmental assessment and soil suitability for drainage is presented in Table 1.  Table 1 Suggested criteria for evaluation of soil for drainage +  Criteria which support drainage  Sign + ➢ Excess water and its duration  − waterlogged soil throughout the year and every year − waterlogged soil half of the year and every year − short seasonal occurrence of excess water   *** ** * ➢ Soil fertility and productive capacity − non-tilled soil – autochthonous vegetation − arable land suitable for crop production − arable land suitable for orchards and vineyards   * ** *** ➢ Soil fertility   − eugley − meadow soil  **** **** **** − alluvium − black marsh soil − peat soil − pseudogley − vertisol − saline, sodic soil and arenosol *** *** ** ** * ➢ Economic criterion based on cost/benefit ratio − cost/benefit  1 − cost/benefit = 1 − cost/benefit  1  ***** ***  -   -  Criteria which support environmental protection Sign  - ➢ High quality forest vegetation − common oak, ash 300 – 500 trees / ha − common oak, ash < 300 trees  / ha − elm, poplar, willow  300 – 500 trees / ha − elm, poplar, willow <  300  trees / ha  ***  ** *** ** ➢ Coppice vegetation − field maple, hawthorn  − common dogwood, viburnum, amorpha − other  ** * - ➢  Protective role of vegetation − flood control − windbreaks to control wind erosion  ** * ➢ Wildlife protection ➢ wildlife  - protected by law                               -  economically valuable species                              -  unthreatened species ➢ Birds  - protected by law   - economically valuable bird species - unthreatened species ➢ Other animal species protected by law  *** **  - *** **  -  ***     Results of applied ecological evaluation of the soil suitability for drainage on Orlača region  Soil suitability for drainage of region Orlača  shown in Table 2 is based on thorough analysis of both agronomical and environmental aspects. ➢ Criterion/Type of soil Eugley Semigley Alluvium ➢ Water excess and its duration criterion − waterlogged soil throughout the year and every year − waterlogged soil half of the year and every year − short seasonal occurrence of excess water waterlogged soil throughout the year and every year (***) waterlogged soil half of the year and every year  (**) short seasonal occurrence of excess water  (*) ➢ Soil fertility and productive capacity − non-tilled soil – autochthonous vegetation − arable land suitable for crop production − arable land suitable for orchards and vineyards  Non tilled soil  (*) Arable land suitable for crop production (**) Arable land suitable for orchards and vineyards (**) ➢ Soil Fertility criterion − eugley − semigley − alluvium eugley (****) semigley (****) alluvium (****) ➢ Economic criterion based on cost/benefit ratio − Cost/benefit (B/C)  1 − Cost/benefit  (B/C) = 1 − Cost/benefit  (B/C)  1 B/C = 1 (***) B/C  1 (*****) B/C  1 (*****) Criteria which support environmental protection    ➢ High quality forest vegetation − common oak, ash 300 – 500 trees / ha − common oak, ash < 300 trees  / ha − elm, poplar, willow  300 – 500 trees / ha − elm, poplar, willow <  300  trees / ha  Present asoc. Populetum i Salicetum (**)          -        - ➢ Coppice vegetation − field maple, hawthorn  − common dogwood, viburnum, amorpha − other       - Field maple hawthorn, acacia, other (**)  ➢ Protective role of vegetation − flood control − windbreaks to control wind erosion  Flood protective vegetation (**)    -    - ➢ Wildlife protection ➢ wildlife  - protected by law                   -  economically valuable species                  -  unthreatened species ➢ Birds  - protected by law   - economically valuable bird species - unthreatened species ➢ Other animal species protected by law  N1    (***)   (***) N2    (***)   (***) N3    (***)   (**) Sum + 11 / -10 +13 / -8 +12 / -5    Near the research region there is Obedska bara – bird refuge park protected both by national and international Law (Fig. 1). It represent natural living place for autochtone species protected by Law suc as: Insecta, Amphibia, Reptila , class of  Hirudinea and Mollusca (Sl. glasnik SRS 11/90 i Sl. glasnik R. Srbije 49/91).   Fig. 1 Geographic position of the research region  Eventhough waterlogging does not cause such a huge problem  as in eugley one, this type of soil is also suitable living place of protected flora and fauna.    Part of the region where alluvium soil is dominant is already partly  drained and cultivated. Special preservation should be given to those species protected by the Law, but only near meander of river Sava.  Suggested criteria has been qualified and summed for each type of soil as positive (criteria which favouraze drainage) and negative value (which favouraze environmental conservations).  Summed values are shown in Fig. 2.   024681012140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8CriteriaValue of criteriaEuglejSemiglejAluvijumnon suitablepartly suitablesuitable Fig. 2 Evaluation soil suitability for drainage on the Orlača region First part of the curves as well as their maximal values represent usual approach of evaluation of soil suitability for drainage. Adding of all coefficients, maximal value obtained for semigley soil is 13, for alluvium 12 and for marshy gley (eugley) soil 11. Criteria which support environmental protection are presented on the decreasing part of the curve. Fig. 2 showed that drainage limitation is the most significant on the eugley type of soil. The last points of the curves represent the final values which comprise all the information both of positive and negative aspects of drainage. It is very delicate to find out scalar value that can be taken as a limit value for determining of total soil suitability for drainage. Possible limit values of 4 and 8 are proposed in this work. Those limit values define 3 zones: zone suitable for drainage would be when sum of all coefficients of  criteria are    8, zone 2 means that soils are  partly suitable for drainage, and   sum of all coefficients of  criteria are 4  criteria   8, and zone 3 means that soils are not suitable for drainage and sum of all coefficients of  criteria are  4.  Using suggested criteria, eugley type of soil on Orlača region is not suitable for drainage. Thorough analysis of positive and negative aspects of drainage showed that alluvium and semigley soils falls into zone 2, meaning that are partly suitable for drainage. Special care has to be done including some additional criteria during the design procedure. Final result should be made in a compromise between agricultural and environmental requirements. Respecting restriction for drainage on semigley and alluvium, final drainage system design for Orlača region should be changed. Adopted drainage system design respecting the environmental requirements is shown in second part of the work.  Conclusion  Evaluation of soil suitability has to include agricultural, economical and ecological parameters. Suggested parameters came out after exhaustive analysis of all positive and negative effects that can be caused by drainage. Evaluation of soils in Orlača region for drainage suitability showed that marshy gely (eugley) type of soil may be considered unfavorable for drainage, whereas meadow soil (semigley) and alluvium are partly suitable.  References  1. Cincović T., (1956) - Močvarna vegetacija u Posavini. Zbornik radova Poljoprivrednog fakulteta. Sv. 1 Beograd, 1956 2. Tanasijević Đ., Antonović G., Aleksić N., Pavićević N., Filipović Đ., Spasojević M. (1966) – Pedološki pokrivač Zapadne i Severozapadne Srbije. Izd. Institut za proučavanje zemljišta u Topčideru. Beograd 1966. 3. Službeni glasnik SRS br. 11/90. 4. Službeni glasnik R. Srbije br. 49/91. 5. Rudić D., Stričević R., Đurović N., 2000 – Melioracije zemljišta uskla|ene sa očuvanjem životne sredine, II. Prethodni rad. Kriterijum procene  pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje sa stanovišta očuvanja životne sredine  Rudić D., Nevenka Đurović and Ružica Stričević1    Rezime  Vrednovanje meliorativnog područja trebalo bi da pored postojećih poljoprivrednih i ekonomskih uključi i ekološke parametre. S obzirom da do danas ne postoj čvrsti kriterijumi za sagledavanje negativnih uticaja mera odvodnjavanja na životnu sredinu, u radu su predloženi mogući kriterijumi za sveobuhvatno vrednovanje pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje. Na osnovu predloženih kriterijuma uvedeni su pragovi pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje. Pokazano je da močvarno-glejno zemljište područja “Orlača” ne treba odvodnjavati, dok  su aluvijalno i  livadsko zemljište uslovno pogodna za odvodnjavanje.   Ključne reči: odvodnjavanje, ekologija  1 Corresponding Author: Ružica Strićević, Faculty of Agriculure, University of Belgrade, Zemun, Nemanjina 6, 11080  

http://aspace.agrif.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/183/1210.pdf

Kriterijum procene pogodnosti zemljišta za odvodnjavanje sa stanovišta očuvanja životne sredine

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

AgroSpace

AgroSpace