Kiefer and Wolfowitz [Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 34 (1976) 73--85] showed that
if F is a strictly curved concave distribution function (corresponding to a
strictly monotone density f), then the Maximum Likelihood Estimator
F^n, which is, in fact, the least concave majorant of the empirical
distribution function Fn, differs from the empirical distribution
function in the uniform norm by no more than a constant times (n−1logn)2/3 almost surely. We review their result and give an updated version of
their proof. We prove a comparable theorem for the class of distribution
functions F with convex decreasing densities f, but with the maximum
likelihood estimator F^n of F replaced by the least squares estimator
Fn: if X1,...,Xn are sampled from a distribution function
F with strictly convex density f, then the least squares estimator
Fn of F and the empirical distribution function Fn differ in the uniform norm by no more than a constant times (n−1logn)3/5 almost surely. The proofs rely on bounds on the interpolation error
for complete spline interpolation due to Hall [J. Approximation Theory 1 (1968)
209--218], Hall and Meyer [J. Approximation Theory 16 (1976) 105--122],
building on earlier work by Birkhoff and de Boor [J. Math. Mech. 13 (1964)
827--835]. These results, which are crucial for the developments here, are all
nicely summarized and exposited in de Boor [A Practical Guide to Splines (2001)
Springer, New York].Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/074921707000000256 in the IMS
Lecture Notes Monograph Series
(http://www.imstat.org/publications/lecnotes.htm) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org