research

A Kiefer--Wolfowitz theorem for convex densities

Abstract

Kiefer and Wolfowitz [Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 34 (1976) 73--85] showed that if FF is a strictly curved concave distribution function (corresponding to a strictly monotone density ff), then the Maximum Likelihood Estimator F^n\hat{F}_n, which is, in fact, the least concave majorant of the empirical distribution function Fn\mathbb {F}_n, differs from the empirical distribution function in the uniform norm by no more than a constant times (n1logn)2/3(n^{-1}\log n)^{2/3} almost surely. We review their result and give an updated version of their proof. We prove a comparable theorem for the class of distribution functions FF with convex decreasing densities ff, but with the maximum likelihood estimator F^n\hat{F}_n of FF replaced by the least squares estimator F~n\widetilde{F}_n: if X1,...,XnX_1,..., X_n are sampled from a distribution function FF with strictly convex density ff, then the least squares estimator F~n\widetilde{F}_n of FF and the empirical distribution function Fn\mathbb {F}_n differ in the uniform norm by no more than a constant times (n1logn)3/5(n^{-1}\log n)^{3/5} almost surely. The proofs rely on bounds on the interpolation error for complete spline interpolation due to Hall [J. Approximation Theory 1 (1968) 209--218], Hall and Meyer [J. Approximation Theory 16 (1976) 105--122], building on earlier work by Birkhoff and de Boor [J. Math. Mech. 13 (1964) 827--835]. These results, which are crucial for the developments here, are all nicely summarized and exposited in de Boor [A Practical Guide to Splines (2001) Springer, New York].Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/074921707000000256 in the IMS Lecture Notes Monograph Series (http://www.imstat.org/publications/lecnotes.htm) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions

    Last time updated on 13/02/2019