รายงานวิจัย -- มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลพระนคร, 2558This research study is Study of Current Problems Obstacles to the work of the academic faculty. To analyze the factors that affect the potential success of the work of the academic faculty. And to formulate a strategy to build the capacity to do the work of the academic faculty. Faculty of Liberal Arts Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon. The researchers mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questionnaires were used to collect data from administrators, faculty, the Faculty of Arts. The researchers mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Research Questionnaires were used to collect data from administrators, faculty, the Faculty of Arts. 60 people and the depth interview interviewed individually to provide a significant number of 10 people. The data were then checked for accuracy. And data analysis and processing computer To calculate the statistical. Frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. And qualitative data Checked for accuracy by means of triangulation. And content analysis With reading comprehension The purpose was to research.
The results showed that Current conditions in the academic faculty have discussed the barriers. Have success in the academic performance of 83.33. The lower third of the academic performance of 80.00. And four consultants to advise on the Academic Performance 76.67 percent. And the two taught 75.00 percent. The factors that affect the potential success of the work of the academic faculty. Overall, the high level (= 4.48, SD = 0.65).The five factors that make success in academic performance. Situated at the highest level (= 4.81, SD = 0.40). The second is the time to do academic work at the highest level (= 4.79, SD = 0.47) and quality of academic performance. Situated at the highest level (= 4.64, SD = 0.52). And a consultant to advise on the Academic Performance. Situated at the highest level (= 4.56, SD = 0.80). The strategic potential of the academic performance of students. Overall, the moderate level (= 3.43, SD = 1.13). The strategy should define one's executives must have a policy seriously. And to be fair to the sender academic performance. The second strategy should reduce the workload for faculty teaching and other work with. In order to have time to do academic work. Strategy three awards to supply support for the preparation of the appropriate academic achievement and extra salary. And strategies for the five should be evaluated on a fair, transparent, fair assessment. The main good governance in the assessment. Transparency, accountability Without prejudice to rate Teachers have the opportunity to make changes to the criteria at all times. 6 and strategy should provide consultants to advise on the academic performance of each branch. The guests were delighted. And it is time to provide advice in a friendly and should be coordinated with the technical evaluation. Or monitoring academic performance in applying the criteria in the evaluation. In the same manner, and justice. There are good governance.Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakho
