The study and analysis of climate change is a global challenge against which environmental, but also economic and social changes, will be measured.
This memorandum illustrates the recent activities carried out by the IGN Peru in collaboration with European institutions

Fabian Brondi Rueda,

Garnero, Gabriele

Giovanni, Righetti

Stefano, Serafini

English

Institutional Research Information System University of Turin

Rivista bimestrale - anno XXIV - Numero 3/2020 - Sped. in abb. postale 70% - Filiale di RomaMag/Giu 2020 anno XXIV N°3EO, VGI AND AI FORLAND MANAGEMENTDISASTER RISK REDUCTION WITH EARTH OBSERVATIONMONITORING ZNOSKO GLACIERTerra SeiSmic earThquake predicTionGEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION3DCADASTRESURVEY TOPOGRAPHYPHOTOGRAMMETRYGNSSBIMCADEARTH OBSERVATIONCARTOGRAPHYGISWEBGISSPACEENVIRONMENTURBAN PLANNINGCULTURAL HERITAGECONSTRUCTIONSMART CITYLiDARNETWORKSLAND LBSUAVChief EditorRENZO CARLUCCI, direttore@rivistageomedia.itEditorial BoardVyron Antoniou, Fabrizio Bernardini, Mario Caporale, Luigi Colombo, Mattia Crespi, Luigi Di Prinzio, Michele Dussi, Michele Fasolo, Marco Lisi, Flavio Lupia, Beniamino Murgante, Aldo Riggio, Mauro Salvemini,  Domenico Santarsiero, Attilio Selvini, Donato TufillaroManaging DirectorFULVIO BERNARDINI, fbernardini@rivistageomedia.itEditorial StaffVALERIO CARLUCCI, GIANLUCA PITITTO, redazione@rivistageomedia.itMarketing AssistantTATIANA IASILLO, diffusione@rivistageomedia.itDesignDANIELE CARLUCCI, dcarlucci@rivistageomedia.it MediaGEO soc. coop.Via Palestro, 95 00185 RomaTel. 06.64871209 - Fax. 06.62209510info@rivistageomedia.it ISSN 1128-8132Reg. Trib. di Roma N° 243/2003 del 14.05.03Stampa: System Graphics SrlVia di Torre Santa Anastasia 61 00134 RomaPaid subscriptionsGEOmedia is available bi-monthly on a subscription basis.The annual subscription rate is € 45. It is possible to subscribe at any time via https://geo4all.it/abbonamento. The cost of one issue is € 9 €, for the previous issue the cost is € 12 €. Prices and conditions may be subject to change.Magazine founded by: Domenico Santarsiero.Issue closed on: 28/08/2020.Science & Technology CommunicationScience & Technology Communicationuna pubblicazione3DTARGET   21ARCHIMETER  9  AUTODESK  29EPSILON    14ESRI ITALIA  39CODEVINTEC  45GEOBUSINESS  15GEC SOFTWARE  2GEOMAX   33GIS3W   20GTER    41PLANETEK  48STONEX   47TEOREMA  46TOPCON   40 ADVIn the background image, many multicolored curves and handles of the Flinders Mountains - the largest mountain system of southern Australia - appear in this image in false-color captured by the Copernicus Sentinel mission-2.This image was captured on December 31 2019 from the two-satellite Sentinel-2, who-se goal is to ensure coverageand the distribution of data required by the program Eu-ropean Copernicus. The datawere tried through the selec-tion of spectral bands useful to classify the geological fe-atures. This image also does part of the video program Earth from Space.poSiTioning, navigaTion and Timingfor planeTary exploraTion andcolonizaTion: To The moon and beyond  by MArcO lisi16diSaSTer riSk reducTion and reconSTrucTion in indoneSia WiTh earTh obServaTion by VincenzO MAssiMi26conTrol and moniToring of The znoSko glacier in anTarcTicaby FAbiAn brOndi ruedA, gAbriele gArnerO, giOVAnni righetti, steFAnO serAFini3434 GEOmedia n°3-2020REPORT The Instituto GeográficoNacional activity in AntarcticaThe Instituto Geografico Na-cional, as head of geospatial in-formation in Peru, collaborated with the other participating in-stitutions, providing them tech-nical-cartographic support dur-ing the development of research projects. During this collabora-tion, topographic maps were generated in the areas adjacent to the Machu Picchu Science Station.The missions covered various scientific aspects, such as:environmental factors regu-lating the distribution of ben-tonite organisms;sampling of ice coring for the measurement of environmen-tal isotopes;study of the potential of Ant-arctic lichens as indicators of climate change;geomorphology and glacial assessment of Punta Crepín;macro-algae acquisition and their dehydration.Since the 1990s, Peru’s IGN (Instituto Geográfico Nacional) has carried out intensive documentation and monitoring activities in the Antarctic territories. During the last few years, these activities have focused on the Znosko glacier.The importance of this project is based on the generation of correct digital elevation models (DEM).In fact, a correct geodesic setting allows to obtain high resolution geospatial products. These inputs represent the fundamental support for the study of the glacial mass balance by institutions such as ANA (Autoridad Nacional del Agua) and INAIGEN (Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Glaciares y Ecosistemas de Montaña).This paper clarifies survey activities carried out so far, analysis and results achieved, and perspectives for next missions.Monitoring activities were carried out in an international cooperation context, involving the Instituto Geográfico Nacional (PE) and MEDS AMSTERDAM BV Society (NE) under the scientific supervision of Politecnico di Torino (ITA).Control and monitoring of the Znosko Glacier in Antarcticaby Fabian Brondi Rueda, Gabriele Garnero, Giovanni Righetti, Stefano SerafiniFig. 1 - Location of the area (j=62° 06’ S, l= 58° 28’ W) GEOmedia n°3-2020            35REPORT The ongoing climate changes have pushed research groups, such as ANA and the Servicio Nacional de Meteorología and Hidrología del Perú; to generate geospatial information on the Znosko glacier.Znosko GlacierZnosko glacier is located in the southern Shetland Islands, in territories claimed by Argentina, Chile and UK.Located at an average altitude of 22 m above sea level, the ter-rain around the glacier is hilly: highest nearby point is Admiral Peak, 305 meters above sea level, located 1.3 kilometers south the glacier.This territory is not anthropized, in fact the nearest inhabited lo-cality is the Brazilian station Commandante Ferraz, about 5 kilometers east of the glacier, and the Peruvian station Machu Picchu.Fig. 3 - Passive geodesic network of the IGN in Antarctica.Fig. 2 - The environmentof Znosko Glacier.Area Sup. haZnosko 900Langer 400Wiracocha 1000Monte Flora 200Petrel gigante 135Tab. 1 – Survey areas and extensionsGen-19 Feb-20 Difference DisplacementNAME East NorthELEV. GEOID East NorthELEV. GEOID East NorthELEV. GEOID DIST. DIREC.ANTAR XXVI 1 423421.479 3116628.701 4.098 423421.485 3116628.684 4.092 -0.006 0.017 0.006 0.018 SEANTAR XXVI 2 425890.704 3117550.113 10.061 425890.700 3117550.118 10.102 0.004 -0.005 -0.041 0.006 NWANTAR XXVI 3 425656.967 3115914.359 40.038 425656.967 3115914.351 40.032 0.000 0.008 0.006 0.008 SANTAR XXVI 4 430017.689 3116142.604 17.882 430017.693 3116142.609 17.898 -0.004 -0.005 -0.016 0.006 NEANTAR XXVI 5 431716.898 3116130.278 2.504 431716.882 3116130.282 2.503 0.016 -0.004 0.001 0.016 NEANTAR XXVI 6 430628.472 3113947.196 11.212 430628.470 3113947.203 11.213 0.002 -0.007 -0.001 0.007 NWANTAR XXVI 7 427494.726 3110835.728 37.729 427494.739 3110835.725 37.734 -0.013 0.003 -0.005 0.013 SEANTAR XXVI 8 422688.250 3110417.789 9.988 422688.264 3110417.784 9.981 -0.014 0.005 0.007 0.018 SETUM01 423494.774 3113442.19 41.393 423494.698 3113442.2 41.47 0.076 -0.007 -0.077 0.076 NWTab. 2 – The IGN passive network36 GEOmedia n°3-2020REPORT Monitoring of the Znosko gla-cier: Missions XXVI and XXVIIMissions XXVI and XXVII were carried out respectively in Janu-ary 2019 and February 2020. They involved, in addition to the Znosko glacier, also other ar-eas subject to photogrammetric survey to create a digital model and orthoimages (Table 1).Overall stability checkIn the last 2 years, a passive monitoring network has been set up covering 9 points, among which were measured with static geodetic measurements some baselines with observations of the order of 2.5-3 hours each, useful for evaluating the overall stability of the area and the tec-tonic movements of these plates.Interpretation of data in this table, currently drafted in UTM SIRGAS-ROU98 zone 21E co-ordinates, reveals a significant movement of all points; among these, the TUM01 summit in particular has a translation of over 7 cm in one year only.For example, Italy has a global movement of the order of 3 cm/year in the direction N-NE, which decreases to 2-3 mm/year if assessed with European refer-ences, with different orienta-tions depending on the tectonic micro-plates.The interest so far aroused by the evidence of these movements suggests rescheduling the execu-tion of the measures for the next five years, in order to evaluate with increased accuracy detected data. Eventually new coordi-nates will be included into the global reference system IGS14.Glaciers geometries evaluationTo evaluate the geometry of the glacier and therefore estimate the involved volumes, it was consid-ered appropriate to use only the basic data obtained from GNSS measurements in RTK mode.In fact, there are reliability prob-lems, in using autocorrelation of images mostly occupied by ice, and therefore devoid of recog-nizable textures and elements.Altitude profiles with an aver-age wheelbase of around seventy meters were used, these were obtained in the 2019 (Antar XXVI) and 2020 (Antar XXVII) campaigns.Differential corrections were performed, using a pair of points near the detection area, resting on the ASTA reference vertex positioned near the flag-pole of the Machu Picchu base.Fig. 4 – RTK Survey Antar XXVII - Training set (green dots, 70%) and Test set (red triangles, 30%).Fig. 5 - Digital model and altimetric contour lines variations between the XXVI and XXVII campaigns. GEOmedia n°3-2020            37REPORT Interpolator model estimating In order to identify the optimal interpolator model based on dis-tribution of points and confor-mation of soil, it was decided to proceed with an estimate of the residues derived from the appli-cation of different interpolating models, based on previous re-search experiences.A subset of data training (70% of the total) -only for the data-set constituted by RTK points, obtained in February 2020 for a total of 1406- was selected, while the remaining part was considered as a test.The models used were the fol-lowing:IDW with exponent 2;Kriging with spherical semi-variogram;Spline with smoothing of both the surface and the first derivative, all with a mini-mum number of 12 points. Synthetic results are reported in Table 3. Fig. 6 - Comparisons between the situations 2019 (A) and 2020 (B).Fig. 7 - Comparisons between the situations 2019 (A) and 2020 (B) for the NE zone of Figure 6.38 GEOmedia n°3-2020REPORT Based on the evaluated resi-dues, it was preferred to oper-ate using the Kriging algorithm on all available datasets.Ablation analysis(2020 vs 2019)The altimetric differences es-timation, highlights a discrete variability of the snow sur-face. This variable becomes important if assessed in rela-tion to the short period of time elapsed between the two find-ings (13 months). The ablation is significant on the whole area subject to RTK investigations, with average values in the order of 4-5 meters.Significant area variations were also found.Fig. 6 shows the variation be-tween the ortho-image of the 2019 and 2020 campaigns:In this, the digitization per-formed on the basis of the or-thophoto of the year 2020 (B), is compared with the ortho-photo of the year 2019 (A).This simple analysis highlights the retreat of the ice (the mixed land-ice areas are highlighted with a dotted background).The difference mentioned above, in linear terms, in vari-ous cases reaches hundreds of meters.When considering the uncov-ered terrain, less significant differences are observed, es-pecially when compared with the phenomenon previously described.An interesting detail is easily appreciated in the North-West area (Fig. 7), in this, the limits of the frozen area, (highlighted by the arrow), show an ad-vance of the surface towards the sea, a sign of an evident spillage phenomenon.This collapse affects a large area with an advancement of the front of about 70 m.Future projections This surfaces study, highlights a huge decrease in the ice mass during the year 2020 com-pared to the year 2019, and in the same period a significant process of the transfer into the sea, probable consequence of a glacial collapse.As mentioned above, given the obvious limitations of the DEM models derived from photogrammetry, only the RTK survey was used for mod-el generation.While representing a robust methodology, going through glaciers by foot with geodesic tools has at least three critical issues:not adequate for the analysis of large extensions;difficult to repeat due to the hostility of the surrounding environment;high risk for the safety of the personnel involved in the ex-ecution of the survey.The hope is to overcome the limitations and problems men-tioned above in the coming campaigns, through the inte-gration of LiDAR systems to be used in the analysis of larger surfaces.AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank General de Brigada Fernando PORTILLO ROMERO, Jefe of the Instituto Geográfico Nacional of Peru.REFERENCESGARNERO, G.; GODONE, D. (2013) Comparisons between different interpolation techniques, The Interna-tional Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-5/W3 (ISSN: 2194-9034), Pagg. 139-144 [DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W3-139-2013, WOS:000358309600021, SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84924290459].MOTTA, M.; DIOLAIUTI, G.; VAS-SENA, G.; SMIRAGLIA, C. (2003) Mass balance and Energy balance at Strandline Glacier (Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica): Methods and preliminary results, Proceed-ings of the 4th Meeting on Italian Antarctic Glaciology, Terra Antarctica reports n.8, Editors: Massimo Frezzotti & Valter Maggi, pp. 21-28, Siena.WEBGRAPHYhttps://www.enea.it/it/seguici/pubblica-zioni/pdf-volumi/2019/xxxiv_spedizione_antartide.pdfhttps://elcomercio.pe/tecnologia/ciencias/comercio-antartida-retroceso-glaciar-znosko-noticia-611907-noticia/https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/30/climate-change-antarctica-greenland-ice-melt-raised-sea-levels-by-half-inch-in-last-16-years.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/environ-ment/2020/mar/11/polar-ice-caps-melting-six-times-faster-than-in-1990shttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-how-much-ice-antarctica-is-losing-mdash-its-a-lot1/https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/KEYWORDSAntarctica; survey; geodesic network; geospatial; DEM; glacial mass balanceABSTRACTThe study and analysis of climate change is a global challenge against which envi-ronmental, but also economic and social changes, will be measured.This memorandum illustrates the recent activities carried out by the IGN Peru in collaboration with European institutions.AUTHORFabian Brondi Ruedafabianbrondi@hotmail.com IGN - Instituto Geográfico Nacional, Lima (PE)Gabriele Garnerogabriele.garnero@unito.itDIST – Politecnico e Università degli Studi di Torino (ITA)Giovanni Righettig.righetti@medsamsterdam.euStefano Serafinis.serafini@medsamsterdam.euMEDS BV – Hengelo (NL)IDW Kriging SplineMedia -0.291 -0.135 0.048Varianza 2.530 0.459 0.632Max_Ass 3.032 1.065 5.464Tab. 3 – Residuals on the different interpolator models.

Control and monitoring of the Znosko Glacier in Antarctica

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Institutional Research Information System University of Turin

Directory of Open Access Journals