This study was a guidance and counseling action research (GCAR). This study was conducted in two cycles, each of cycles consisting of planning, acting, observating and reflecting. Source of data comes from students. Technique of collecting data used was an observation an academic questionaire on the finding in the field. The data validation was conducted using data triangulation and expert metode. The data analysis employed precentage analysis technique and clinical. The research procedure used Kemmis and MC Taggart’s model. The result of research showed that the average pretest value of 75,92. Posttest siclus I showed average value os 88,17 and increasing precentage about 16,12 % was said not significant. The result of action in cycle II showed significant degression of 120,08 and increased of 58,36 % with showed significant value
