A Study on the Physical Sensations of Four Kinds of Trial Toothbrushes and Four Different Toothbrushing Methods

Abstract

Using 65 students of the hygiene school attached to Matsumoto Dental College (35 first-year students, 30 second-year students) as subjects, we performed an investigation into the different physical sensations produced when using 4 trial toothbrushes and 4 different toothbrushing methods. The conclusions are as follows: 1. "Length of brush": There was a tendency to reply that the length of brush seemed slightly shorter when the students brushed with the Roll method, rather than the other three methods. 2. "Stiffness of filaments": There was a tendency to reply that the bristle was much harder when the students brushed with methods from Group B (Methods that primarily use the tip of the bristle) than with methods from Group A (Methods which use the side of the bristle). 3. "Tooth brush wear": A large percentage of students replied that the bristle was more durable when using methods from Group B rather than Group A. 4. "Physical sensation on tooth and gingiva": Brush M and the Open-tufted brush, both classified as "medium" stiffness, were preferred. 5. "Physical sensation of holding the handle": 80-90% of the students, regardless of the toothbrushing method employed, liked the handles of the brushes

    Similar works