Conducting a global toxicological evaluation of chemicals is a considerable
challenge, as each single chemical is characterised by specific toxicological
features (lethal effects, carcinogenicity, etc.). Given the increasing concern
regarding the use of chemicals in everyday life and workplaces, in recent
years several methods for chemical hazard screening have been developed
[1, 2]. In all cases, a limited number of categories was defined, thus
significant difference in toxicity among chemicals could be minimised. In
this work, a number of chemicalswere subjected to a toxicological ranking
based on the most important types of toxicity using multi-criteria analysis
(MCA). Data about pollutant global hazard and concentration values in
wastewater were combined to provide an indication about the toxicological
impact of textile factories. GreenPeace identified eleven classes of
hazardous chemicals that should be eliminated by top brands in the
framework of the "Detox" campaign [3], with the aim of reducing water
pollution caused by the textile industry. The MCA ranking included the
above mentioned classes of chemicals with the addition of cyanide, given its
known lethal effect. The types of toxicity selected as criteria were: acute
toxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, acute aquatic toxicity and
chronic aquatic toxicity, in this order of importance. Heavy metals and
cyanide were the most dangerous compoundsidentified by the assessment.
On average, the most polluting facilities were located in India and China.
Since incoming water was usually characterised by a minimum
toxicological impact, the responsibility for the high toxicity scores of
facilities wereassigned to the suppliers