Hopefully tex-able version.Comment: 13 pages, UMHEP-37

B. W. Lynn

David Kastor

F. A. Bais

H. C. Luckock

J. D. Bekenstein

Jennie Traschen

K. Lee

M. Barriola

M. Colpi

M. Visser

N. K. Glendenning

P. van Nieuwenhuizen

S. Adler

S. Bachall

S. Coleman

S. Droz

Y. Choquet-Bruhat

Y. M. Cho

English

arXiv

Crossref

Horizons inside classical lumps

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physic

CiteSeerX

We investigate the possibility of having horizons inside various classical field configurations. Using the implicit function theorem, we show that models satisfying a certian set of criteria allow for (at least) small horizons within extended matter fields. Gauge and global monopoles and Skyrmions satisfy these criteria. Q balls and boson stars are examples which do not and can be shown not to allow for horizons. In examples that do allow for horizons, we show how standard  no hair  arguments are avoided

Kastor, David

Traschen, Jennie

ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst

This is the pre-published version harvested from ArXiv. The published version is located at http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v46/i12/p5399_1We investigate the possibility of having horizons inside various classical field configurations. Using the implicit function theorem, we show that models satisfying a certian set of criteria allow for (at least) small horizons within extended matter fields. Gauge and global monopoles and Skyrmions satisfy these criteria. Q balls and boson stars are examples which do not and can be shown not to allow for horizons. In examples that do allow for horizons, we show how standard "no hair" arguments are avoided

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.263.3411

Horizons Inside Classical Lumps

Horizons Inside Classical Lumps

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

CiteSeerX

ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst

ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst