Formisani, Brunello

Girimonte, Rossella

Vivacqua, Vincenzino

English

Engineering Conferences International

Engineering Conferences InternationalECI Digital ArchivesThe 14th International Conference on Fluidization– From Fundamentals to Products Refereed Proceedings2013Design Criteria for a Packed-Fluidized Bed:Homogeneous Fluidization of Geldart’s Class BSolidsRossella GirimonteUniversity of Calabria, ItalyVincenzino VivacquaUniversity of Calabria, ItalyBrunello FormisaniUniversity of Calabria, ItalyFollow this and additional works at: http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization_xivPart of the Chemical Engineering CommonsThis Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Refereed Proceedings at ECI Digital Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in The14th International Conference on Fluidization – From Fundamentals to Products by an authorized administrator of ECI Digital Archives. For moreinformation, please contact franco@bepress.com.Recommended CitationRossella Girimonte, Vincenzino Vivacqua, and Brunello Formisani, "Design Criteria for a Packed-Fluidized Bed: HomogeneousFluidization of Geldart’s Class B Solids" in "The 14th International Conference on Fluidization – From Fundamentals to Products",J.A.M. Kuipers, Eindhoven University of Technology R.F. Mudde, Delft University of Technology J.R. van Ommen, Delft Universityof Technology N.G. Deen, Eindhoven University of Technology Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2013). http://dc.engconfintl.org/fluidization_xiv/78DESIGN CRITERIA FOR A PACKED-FLUIDIZED BED: HOMOGENEOUS FLUIDIZATION OF GELDART’S CLASS B SOLIDS Rossella Girimontea*, Vincenzino Vivacquaa and Brunello Formisania aUniversity of Calabria; Dept. Chemical Engineering and Materials  I 87030 Arcavacata di Rende (Cosenza), Italy *T: +39-0984-496689; F: +39-0984-496655; E: rossella.girimonte@unical.it   ABSTRACT  Homogeneous fluidization of Geldart’s group B solids was investigated in two packed columns (5 and 10 cm OD) whose packing spheres were either 0.41 cm lead shots or 1.1 cm glass beads. Some criteria to obtain regular regimes of homogeneous fluidization were fixed and the parameters of the Richardson-Zaki equation which describes the expansion process were identified. INTRODUCTION  The interstitial network provided by a packed solid constitutes a confining environment in which a finer solid can be suspended without the formation of bubbles. Thus, homogeneous fluidization of Geldart’s group B particles can be obtained if they are let expand in the voids of a packed bed (1-7). This method seems likely to provide a very efficient fluid-solid contact mode, suitable for high conversion of gaseous reactants or nearly complete adsorption of specific components of the fluidizing stream. Operations of this kind could perhaps be conducted in a packed-fluidized bed over a broad velocity range without the handling problems orderly associated to the use of fine powders. That is even more true for applications in which  the solid of interest (for instance a sorbent or a catalyst) is a powder obtained from a synthesis, then granulated in nearly spherical pellets of larger size. What reported in the present work shows how to assign to the main variables that influence the behaviour of a packed-fluidized bed values suitable for obtaining a regular regime of homogeneous fluidization. EXPERIMENTAL In order to explore the potentiality of the technique, various experiments were carried out in two columns with an outer diameter of 5 cm (ID=4.95 cm) and 10 cm (ID=9.32 cm), respectively. In all of them, both the confining packed bed and the particles subjected to fluidization with air in its void matrix were approximately spherical. Two different types of packing were used, as either 0.41 cm lead spheres or 1.1 cm glass beads were used. The fluidized solids were several cuts of glass ballotini, whose average size df ranged from 100 to 588 m, as well as samples of ceramic (CE), zirconium oxide (ZO) and bronze spheres (BR) (see Tables 1 and 2). The height Hfc of the finer bed in the fixed state was orderly 5 cm, although additional experiments with heights up to 25 cm were also carried out to verify the invariance of the minimum fluidization velocity with the solid mass. The height of the packed bed was accordingly set equal to 4 Hfc, to explore the whole homogeneous expansion regime of each solid sample. In a typical experiment the packing spheres are first poured onto the column to form a packed bed of height Hp; subsequently, the finer solid is loaded and its height Hfc recorded after a complete fluidization-defluidization cycle. At the end of these preliminary steps, the bed configuration is that illustrated in Fig.1.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Fig.1 -  Sketch of the confined fluidized bed.  After measuring the heights of the two beds have been measured, the packing bed voidage p, the volumetric solid fractions (p, f), the bed voidage  and the equivalent voidage fc (i.e. the voidage that the fine bed would have in a column of section Aεp) are calculated according to equations (1)-(4). The experiment is then started and the gas flow velocity progressively increased; the total pressure drop and the bed height are determined at each value of u until the expansion of the fine solid brings it to reach the free surface of the coarse packing.   Table 1. Experimental results and calculated parameters.     Column diameter: 5 cm; Packing diameter: 0.41 cm  .  Particle density f   [g cm-3] Sauter diameter df  [10-4cm]  df/dh [-] Confined  umfc   [cm s-1] nexp  [-] u0,exp [cm/s] ncalc  [-] u0,calc [cm/s] GB  90-125 m 2.48 100 0.060 0.50 4.27 89 4.26 90 GB 125-150 m 136 0.082 0.83 4.08 107 4.05 116 GB 150-200 m 171 0.103 1.10 4.03 120 3.93 134 GB 200-250 m 228 0.137 2.48 3.98 149 3.85 152 GB 250-300 m 271 0.163 2.95 3.78 161 3.80 161 GB 300-355 m 327 0.197 4.88 3.60 173 3.79 169 GB 355-400 m 361 0.218 6.26 3.61 189 3.79 172 CE 200-250 m 3.78  230 0.139 1.55 3.56 186 3.72 196 CE 250-300 m 268 0.161 2.58 3.90 234 3.70 204 ZO 200-250 m 6.15 245 0.148 4.38 3.70 260 3.58 262 ZO 250-300 m 261 0.157 6.32 3.52 263 3.60 267 BR 200-250 m 8.75 229 0.138 4.66 3.56 321 3.53 314 BR 250-300 m 272 0.164 8.99 3.26 339 3.48 327 GB=glass ballotini, CE=ceramic, ZO=zirconium oxide, BR=bronze, LS=lead spheres    RESULTS  The two diagrams of Fig.2 illustrate the typical variation of the pressure drop across the confined bed, Pconf, and that of the bed voidage  versus the superficial gas velocity. Pconf is the difference between the total pressure drop and that relevant to the upper region of the packing devoid of fines:                                                                                   Data of Fig.2 were obtained in the smaller column, with GB136 and BR229 as confined particles, and reveal a different behaviour in the particulate fluidization of the two systems. Bronze particles exhibit more regular homogeneous expansion, which starts at a definite value of umfc. Voidage variation is described by a unique power law and the corresponding pressure drop is described by Ergun's equation. On the other hand, glass particles do not show an equally sharp transition to homogeneous fluidization; moreover, their expansion follows two different trends: at relatively low velocities the pressure drop tends to remain constant as in conventional fluidization, whereas a monotonic increase is observed at higher velocities.   Fig.2 -  Typical experimental variation of the pressure drop and voidage with  fluidization velocity. Inspection of this type of diagrams for all the solids investigated suggests a criterion for selecting the diameter of the packed particles as suitable for the Table 2. Experimental results and calculated parameters. Column diameter: 10 cm; Packing diameter: 1.1 cm  Particle density f   [g cm-3] Sauter diameter df  [10-4cm]  df/dh [-] Confined  umfc   [cm s-1] nexp  [-] u0,exp [cm/s] ncalc  [-] u0,calc [cm/s] GB 300-355 m 2.48 319 0.070 3.85 3.30 241 3.31 252 GB 400-500 m 460 0.102 8.54 3.11 303 3.19 282 GB 560-630 m 588 0.130 12.5 2.83 324 3.15 294  specific solid to be fluidized in their voids. As discussed elsewhere (8), a geometrical parameter capable to describe the interaction between solid is the equivalent hydraulic diameter of the void network of the packed bed                                                                               whose value for the two systems of Fig.2 results equal to 0.168 and 0.453 cm, respectively. In more general terms, it can be stated that solids with a ratio df/dh lower than about 0.1 display an anomalous homogeneous regime. This is the case of the three finest cuts of GB in the 5 cm column and of the two finest cuts in the 10 cm column. A possible interpretation of this finding is that in the fixed state small particles can penetrate the voids of the packing more deeply than bigger ones, up to the region close to the contact points between coarse spheres. It may be thought, therefore, that at relatively low velocities the amount of particles involved in the expansion process is somewhat limited and that higher velocities are required to suspend the whole fine mass. In the light of these considerations, the following criteria are suggested to obtain a homogeneous regime of confined fluidization: dh should not be larger than 10df; to ensure smooth percolation, the choice of the packing diameter should be such that df/dp≤ 0.15. In addition, the ratio D/dp has to be not lower than 5, to ensure negligible effects of the column wall (9). Since with packings of spheres p is approximately equal to 0.38, eq. (7) sets the maximum value of dp as                                                                        so that, given df, the advisable range of variation of dp is determined as                                                                       An additional requirement originates from the necessity of minimizing the relative weight of the fluid dynamic singularities typical of the distributor region on the overall behaviour of the confined bed. Experimental measurements of umfc carried out on beds of different height, give rise to the typical trends of Fig.3; it is then verified that umfc becomes independent of the confined bed mass at Hfc/D2. These constant values of umfc are reported in Tabs 1 and 2.  As regards the packed bed height Hp, it has to be set at values that allow the desired level of voidage, i.e the desired degree of expansion of the confined bed. This result can be accomplished by means of the set of equations (1)-(4). Consistently with what reported in other studies (7, 8) the process of expansion of confined gas-fluidized beds is regulated by a modified form of the Richardson and Zaki’s equation. As first proposed by Glasserman et al. (6), the parameters n and u0 can be obtained by fitting the experimental values of u/p versus fc with a straight line on a logarithmic plot.  Fig.3 -  Variation of the confined fluidization velocity with the bed aspect ratio. The expansion trends relevant to some of the materials of the present study are shown in the three diagrams of Fig.4. The values of n and u0 obtained by this procedure are reported in Tabs 1 and 2.            Fig.4 -  Expansion diagrams of the confined fluidized beds. THEORY                                                                                                                  Whenever regular homogeneous expansion is observed, the exponent n of the Richardson and Zaki’s equation can be calculated by the relationship reported in a previous work (8):                                                                                       The Reynolds number at terminal velocity, Ret, is related to the Archimedes number by the following equation, reported by Gibilaro (10):                                                                                 where                                    and                                                      The values of n calculated from eq. (9) are reported in Tabs 1 and 2. As shown in Fig.5, where a comparison is made with the experimental values of the same parameter, the agreement is satisfactory in almost all cases. A simple model for estimating u0, i.e. the maximum expansion velocity of the confined bed, is provided by a force balance on the single particle, whose general one-dimensional form is that reported by Wallis (11). Under the assumption of uniform steady flow and negligible contact forces, it becomes                                                                          where V is the single particle volume and Fd is the drag force that acts on it. Conceptually, in a fluidized bed the total pressure gradient (which includes the static  pressure drop) is [(1-)f+g]g; thus, eq. (12) yields                                                                              Since at =1, Fd must be equal to the drag force Fdt at terminal conditions, the following relationship, coincident with that reported by Di Felice (12), is obtained:                                                                                 As far as the confined system is regarded as a fluidized bed of cross-sectional area Ap, eq. (14) should still be valid. Fdt can then be calculated from a suitable correlation for the friction factor. To this purpose, a good choice seems that of the equation derived from Dallavalle by Gibilaro (10) as its simple form covers the whole field of variation of the Reynolds number. Given that at the maximum expansion velocity =p (so that fc=1),  this substitution changes Eq. (14) into:                                                                                       where Re0=gu0df/g. Eq. (15) gives the drag force on the single particle in the absence of packing, i.e. when p=1. When the fine particles are extremely diluted inside the packed bed, the pressure gradient is that due only to the coarse spheres. In a fixed bed of cross-sectional area Ap it can thus be calculated as                                                                                        Substitution of equations (15) and (16) into (12) allows calculating the maximum expansion velocity u0. As done for the parameter n, the calculated values of u0 are reported in Tabs 1 and 2. Again, Fig.5 shows that the error associated with this method of prediction is acceptable, as it seldom exceeds 10%.  Fig.5 -  Comparison between experimental and calculated values of the expansion index and of the maximum expansion velocity of confined beds.  CONCLUSIONS The results reported in this work allow fixing some criteria to obtain regular regimes of homogeneous fluidization. They regard: the choice of the packed bed particle size; the minimum aspect ratio of the confined bed that guarantees the minimum fluidization velocity to be independent of the solid mass; the packed bed height necessary to operate the particle system over a broad field of homogeneous expansion. As far as these criteria are obeyed, the homogeneous expansion of Geldart's B particles can be described by a modified form of the Richardson-Zaki equation. The two parameters of this relationship, namely the expansion index n and the maximum expansion velocity u0, are predicted with good accuracy by the model proposed.  NOTATION A column cross-sectional area, cm2 umfc minimum fluidization velocity of the confined bed, cm/s Ar Archimedes Number  ( =gdp3(f-g)g/g2 ), - ut terminal velocity, cm/s D column internal diameter, cm u0 maximum expansion velocity in the packed bed, cm/s df fine solid diameter, cm V fine particle volume, cm3 dh hydraulic diameter of the voids , cm z vertical distance above  the distributor, cm dp diameter of the packed solid, cm   Fd Drag force on the single particle, dyn Greek symbols Fdt  Drag force on the single particle at terminal conditions, dyn f/p  fraction of the fine /packed  solid, - Hfc confined bed height, cm Pconf pressure drop in the confined system, dyn/cm2 Hp packed bed height, cm  voidage of the confined bed, - n expansion index, - fc voidage of the equivalent conventional bed (=/p), - P pressure, dyn/cm2 p voidage of the packed bed, - Ret terminal Reynolds Number (=gutdf/g), -  gas viscosity, (g/cm s) Re0 Reynolds Number at the maximum expansion velocity (=gu0df/g), - f density of the fine solid, g/cm3 u superficial gas velocity, cm/s g gas density, g/cm3      REFERENCES 1. Song, X., Wang, Z., Jin, Y. and Tanaka, Z., 1995. Gas-solid circulating fluidization in a packed bed. Powder Technol. 83: 127–131. 2. van der Ham, A.G.J., Prins, W. and van Swaaij, W.P.M., 1994. A small-scale regularly packed circulating fluidized bed Part I: Hydrodynamics. Powder Tech. 79: 17–28. 3. van der Ham, A.G.J., Prins, W. and van Swaaij, W.P.M., 1994.  A small-scale regularly packed circulating fluidized bed Part II: Mass transfer. Powder Tech., 79: 29–41. 4. Ding, Y., Wang, Z., Wen, D., Ghadiri, M., Fan, X. and Parker, D., 2005. Solids behaviour in a gas solid two-phase mixture flowing through a packed particle bed. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60: 5231–5239. 5. Delebarre, A., Bitaud, B. and Regnier, M.C., 1997. Gas-solid suspension flowing through a granular bed. Powder Tech. 91: 229–236. 6. Glasserman, P., Videla, D. and Bohm, U., 1994. Liquid fluidization of particle in packed beds. Powder Tech. 79: 237–245. 7. Donsì, G., Ferrari, G. and Formisani, B., 1989. Expansion behavior of confined fluidized beds of fine particles. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 67: 185–190. 8. Girimonte, R. and Vivacqua, V. , 2011. The expansion process of particle beds fluidized in the voids of a packing of coarse spheres. Powder Tech. 213: 63-69. 9. Di Felice, R. and Gibilaro, L.G. , 2004. Wall effects for the pressure drop in fixed beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59: 3037–3040. 10. Gibilaro, L.G., 2001. Fluidization-dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. 11. Wallis, G.B., 1969. One-dimensional Two-phase Flow. McGraw-Hill, New York. 12. Di Felice, R. 1994. The voidage function for fluid-particle interaction systems. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 20: 153-159. 

Design Criteria for a Packed-Fluidized Bed: Homogeneous Fluidization of Geldart’s Class B Solids

https://dc.engconfintl.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&amp;context=fluidization_xiv

Design Criteria for a Packed-Fluidized Bed: Homogeneous Fluidization of Geldart’s Class B Solids

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Engineering Conferences International