research

New Precision Electroweak Tests in Supergravity Models

Abstract

We update the analysis of the precision electroweak tests in terms of 4 epsilon parameters, ϵ1,2,3,b\epsilon_{1,2,3,b}, to obtain more accurate experimental values of them by taking into account the new LEP data released at the 28th ICHEP (1996, Poland). We also compute ϵ1\epsilon_1 and ϵb\epsilon_b in the context of the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model to obtain the updated constraints by imposing the correlated constraints in terms of the experimental ellipses in the ϵ1ϵb\epsilon_1-\epsilon_b plane and also by imposing the new bound on the lightest chargino mass, mχ1±79m_{\chi^\pm_1}\gtrsim 79 GeV GeV. Upon imposing these new experimental results, we find that the situations in the no-scale model are much more favorable than those in the standard model, and if mt170m_t\gtrsim 170 GeV GeV, then the allowed regions at the 95% C.~L. in the no-scale model are tanβ4\tan\beta\gtrsim 4 and mχ1±120(82)m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lesssim 120 (82) GeV GeV for μ>0(μ<0)\mu>0 (\mu<0), which are in fact much more stringent than in our previous analysis. Therefore, assuming that mt170m_t\gtrsim 170 GeV GeV, if the lightest chargino mass bound were to be pushed up only by a few GeV, the sign on the Higgs mixing term μ\mu in the no-scale model could well be determined from the ϵ1ϵb\epsilon_1-\epsilon_b constraint to be positive at the 95% C.~L. At any rate, better accuracy in the measured mtm_t from the Tevatron in the near future combined with the LEP data is most likely to provide a decisive test of the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model.Comment: 15 pages, REVTEX, 1 figure (not included but available as a ps file from [email protected]

    Similar works

    Available Versions

    Last time updated on 05/06/2019