by planting wheat, to investigate the response of planting methods and tank mixed herbicides. The experiment was laid out using a split plot arrangement, in randomized complete block design with three replications. Methods of planting were assigned to the main plots; while tank mixed herbicides were kept in the sub-plots. The sub-plot size measured 4.5 X 4.5 m 2 . Row to row distance was kept at 30 cm. Data were recorded on weed density m -2 , plant height (cm), spike length (cm), Number of spikes m -2 , Number of grains spike -1 , 1000 grain weight (g), biological yield (kg ha The data for individual traits were subjected to ANOVA technique and significant means were separated by the LSD test. The analysis of the data showed that methods of sowing were statistically significant for plant height, No. of grains spike -1 , 1000-grain weight and biological yield. The herbicides were statistically significant for all the parameters investigated except No. of grains spike -1 , while the interaction of methods of planting with herbicides could not reach the level of significance in any of the traits examined. Among the methods of planting, line sowing was the best followed by line + broadcast sowing. The herbicide mixtures controlled mixed stands of broadleaf and grassy weeds to the tune of 65 to 74% with a consequent increase in grain yield from 58-107%. Buctril-M + Topik 15 WP, 2,4-D + Puma Super 75 EW and Topik 15 WP were segregated as the top scoring applications by increasing yield to the extent of 107, 104 and 101 %, respectively over the weedy check
