Abstract Abstract solvers are a recently employed method to formally analyze algorithms that earns some advantages w.r.t. traditional ways such as pseudo-code-based description. Abstract solvers proved to be a useful tool for describing, comparing and composing solving techniques in various fields such as SAT, SMT, ASP, CASP. In ASP, abstract solvers have been so far employed for describing solvers for brave reasoning tasks. In this paper we apply, for the first time, this methodology to the analysis of ASP solvers for cautious reasoning tasks. We describe and compare the available approaches in the literature, which employ techniques for computing over-and under-approximations of the solution, the last including "coherence tests" for deciding the inclusion of a single atom in the solution, a technique borrowed from backbone computation of CNF formulas. Then, we show how to improve the current abstract solvers with new techniques, in order to design new solving algorithms
