This paper deals with problematic of biogas plants. Economical evaluation of biogas plant will be
described

Kurimský, Peter

Mészsáros, Alexander

Zbojovský, Ján

University of West Bohemia Digital Library

Economic evaluation of biogas plant

DSpace at University of West Bohemia

Intensive Programme 2014 “Perspectives for the development of low-power systems using biomass”   154   ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF BIOGAS PLANT Alexander Mészáros, Ján Zbojovský, Peter Kurimský ABSTRACT This paper deals with problematic of biogas plants. Economical evaluation of biogas plant will be described. 1. INTRODUCTION Exploitable potential of biomass in Slovakia is 11,237 GWh per year, which would cover nearly 40% of annual electricity consumption in Slovakia. The big advantage of biomass is, that biomass don’t leave “carbon footprint”, because biomass during its growth through photosynthesis consumes carbon dioxide, which is released into the atmosphere in its energy use. In conditions of Slovak Republic biomass energy can be utilized as: • forest biomass - fuel wood, energy crops, • agricultural biomass - waste of growing and processing crops, garden biomass from orchards and vineyards, production of liquid biofuels (bioethanol), livestock manure, waste from the food industry, • waste - waste wood processing industry, municipal waste, sludge from sewage treatment plants. In this paper economic evaluation of biogas plant construction will be described. [1] 2. LOCATON OF BIOGAS PLANT   The location of the biogas plant is considered in Kechnec, Slovakia, industrial zone. This industrial zone is located in the area focused on agricultural production which means that it would ensure adequate supply of materials.   Table 1 Amount of input feedstock   Feedstock Quantity t/y Yield m3/t Production m3/y Corn Silage 17 000 200 3 400 000 Cuttings of sugar beet 1675 90 150 750 The total amount of biogas production 3 550 750   Table 2 The basic technological parameters of waste heat total amount of biogas production  Basic parameters of BGS electric 1 000 kW Installed capacity heat 1 376 kW Biogas production 10 080 m3/day 8 250 h/y Using of equipment 94,17 % Intensive Programme 2014  “Perspectives for the development of low-power systems using biomass”    155   Own consumption of  BGS 4 % Supply of electric energy 7 933 MWh Sales price of electricity 107,53 €/MWh Technological heat supply 15 % 35 536 GJ Heat supply 9 872 MWh 15 €/GJ The price of heat 54 €/MWh 3. BALANCE OF ELECTRIC AND HEAT ENERGY Produced thermal energy will be used for own fermentation process. According to law No. 309/2009 on RES has been put condition to obtain the full amount of the redemption price of electric energy. Producer of electricity in the BGS combustion of biogas produced from the anaerobic fermentation for this electricity gets 100% of the redemption price if the technological consumption is measured - share the use of technological heat consumption shall be 25% of the total heat production. If technological consumption is not measured - share the use of technological heat consumption should be 15% of the total heat production. [2], [3].  Electric power KGJ:   1 MW Exploitation of maximum power:   8 250 h Amount of electric energy at the generator terminals:   8 250 MWh Losses + own consumption of electricity (4%):    8 250 x 0,04 = 330 MWh  Quantity of supplied electric energy:   7 920 MWh Price paid for electricity:   107,53 €/MWh Annual revenues from sale of electric energy:   7 920 x 107,53 = 851 637,6 € CHP thermal power:   1,376 MWt Amount of produced heat:   11 352 MWht Heat consumption (15%):   11 352 x 0,15 = 1 703 MWh Heat delivered to the customer:   11 352 - 1703 = 9 649 MWh Price paid of heat:   49 €/MWh  Annual revenues from sale of electric energy:   9 649 x 49 = 472 811 € Annual sales total:   851 637,6 + 472 811 = 1 324 448 € 4. CAPEX (CAPITAL EXPENDITURES) The amount of investment costs and their distribution for the proposed solution lies in the following tables:  Table 3 Distribution of capital costs  Capital expenditure % EUR Total investments 100 3 980 000 Building part 45 1 791 000 Technological part 35 1 393 000 Engineering (design documentation, authorization) 5 199 000 Earth works 15 597 000  For the mentioned variant is proposed financing rate of 40% own capital and 60% foreign sources, which represents a loan from the bank. Financing through a bank loan is justified on the basis of determining the amount of return on equity. The higher ratio of foreign sources the higher profit on equity capital at the same interest rate.  Intensive Programme 2014  “Perspectives for the development of low-power systems using biomass”    156   Table 4 Method of funding  Total investment cost 3 980 000 Investor's own resources 40% 1 592 000 External funding (loan) 60% 2 388 000 interest rate 5% p. a. Time of repayment 10 years  For redemption at a constant height annuity the amount of interest at the rate of 5% p.a. represents 704 458 €. On Figure 1 is shown the redemption plan for presented variant. The amount of interest rate for constant amortization at an interest rate of 5% p.a. represents 656 700 €.   Table 5 Redemption plan   paid Interest Rate Period The residue of debts interest amortization paid 0 2 388 000 - - 0 1 2 149 200 119 400 238 800 238 800 2 1 910 400 107 460 238 800 477 600 3 1 671 600 95 520 238 800 716 400 4 1 432 800 83 580 238 800 955 200 5 1 194 000 71 640 238 800 1 194 000 6 955 200 59 700 238 800 1 432 800 7 716 400 47 760 238 800 1 671 600 8 477 600 35 820 238 800 1 910 400 9 238 800 23 880 238 800 2 149 200 10 0 11 940 238 800 2 388 000                         Figure 1 – Redemption plan Intensive Programme 2014  “Perspectives for the development of low-power systems using biomass”    157   5. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Sensitivity analysis gives an overview of which factor in the preparation, construction and operation of the project should be given greater attention. It is necessary to transfer part of the risk to suppliers of technology, raw material supplier or other suppliers to incorporate the requirements into individual contract relations. Such example can be, e.g. the dependence of the electricity produced from biogas quality parameters. Amount of biogas produced from the input of the substrate depends on its quality.    Figure 2 – Dependence IRR from the redemption price for electricity  On figure 2 is dependence of the internal rate of return from the from the redemption price for electricity. At the current redemption price at 107, 53 €/MWh. IRR is at 22, 35%.  Figure 3 Dependence of IRR from redemption price of heat Intensive Programme 2014  “Perspectives for the development of low-power systems using biomass”    158   To make the project profitable minimum price of heat should not decrease below 10 € / MWh.   Figure 4 - Dependence of NPV from the redemption price  On figure 4 is NPV sensitivity analysis during the change of redemption price at 5% of discount rate. Based on NPV analysis can determine the amount of the redemption price impact on the profitability of the project. That the proposed variant should by profitable, the redemption price of electricity should not decrease below 70 € / MWh.   Figure 5 - Dependence of NPV from the change of discount rate  From dependence on the NPV discount rate in Figure 5 shows that the project would not be profitable at a discount rate greater than 22%.  Intensive Programme 2014  “Perspectives for the development of low-power systems using biomass”    159   6. CONCLUSIONS  Biogas plants are an appropriate way to diversify energy sources and thus contribute to reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels. They also contribute to the improvement of the regional economy and increase employment. However, with the development of biogas plants must also take the development of electricity supply system, because biogas plants represent decentralized resource which operates certain retroactive effects on the system, which was primarily designed for centralized electricity generation. The advantage of the variant for combined heat and power production may be less sensitivity to changes in the redemption price of electricity, which is guaranteed for a shorter period than the life of the equipment.  REFERENCES [1]  FÁBERA Andrej a kol.: Atlas obnoviteľných zdrojov na Slovensku. Energetické centrum Bratislava. 2012. ISBN 978-80-969646-2-8.  [2] Vyhláška č. 372/2011 o spôsobe výpočtu ročnej výroby tepla pri výrobe elektriny spaľovaním bioplynu získaného anaeróbnou fermentáciou [3] Historie a perspektivy OZE – bioplyn. <http://oze.tzb-info.cz/biomasa/5610-historie-a-perspektivy-oze-bioplyn> [4] TKÁČ, Ján – HVIZDOŠ, Marek: Netradičné zdroje energie. Košice: TU-FEI, 2012. [cit 2014-3-20] 117 s. ISBN 978-80-553-092 [5] M. Hvizdoš, J. Tkáč: Energetické využitie biomasy a bioplynu.  <http://jeen.fei.tuke.sk/index.php/jeen/article/view/48/54>> [6] Výhrevnosť bioplynu. Agrobiomasa. <http://www.agrobiomasa.sk/index.php?s=2.5.1>    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work was carried out within the project VEGA 1/0388/13, with the support of the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences. 

English

http://dspace5.zcu.cz/bitstream/11025/16496/1/Meszaros.pdf

Economic evaluation of biogas plant

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of West Bohemia Digital Library

DSpace at University of West Bohemia