2,156 research outputs found

    Residential care for elderly people: policy implications from an exploratory study

    No full text
    The Association of Directors of Social Services, in response to the Burgner review, has called for joint health and local-authority inspection of residential homes (Community Care, 8.1.97, p. 1). Yet there is little agreement about what constitutes good residential care (Gibbs and Sinclair, 1992). Without such information, we cannot make valid comparisons between homes or set meaningful standards. The study described below tested a wide range of possible measures of quality of care. It adopted an eclectic approach, including the perspectives of residents, health and social care professionals, home staff, managers, and relatives. Full details of the instruments used are given in the final report, which is available from the Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent at Canterbury, CT2 7NF, as Discussion Paper 1245

    Quality of care: testing some measures in homes for elderly people

    No full text
    In this national study of 17 residential homes, 309 residents were interviewed, 264 members of staff completed an anonymous survey, and 228 relatives responded to a postal questionnaire. The data were collected between January andSeptember 1995. The aim of the study was to suggest promising measures of quality of care, looking particularly at depression as a possible indicator. It also served as a follow-up study of the Caring in Homes Initiative, although its timing ruled out evaluation of the impact of this development programme, because changes occurred in the homes before this study began. No strict definition of quality was adopted a priori, but a pragmatic approach was taken, addressing the perspectives of residents, health and social care professionals, home staff, managers, and relatives

    EXASS Net - Moscow meeting.

    Get PDF

    Which Australian secondary school students are at risk of illicit drug use?

    Get PDF
    This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Freeman, T., White, V., & Roche, A.M. (2011) Which Australian secondary school students are at risk of illicit drug use? : A nationwide survey. Drug and Alcohol Review, 30, 589-596], which has been published in final form at [DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00246.x]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.Introduction and aims: Over recent years, numerous school-based preventive strategies have been explored as possible options to address illicit drug use by young people. However, there is scope to extend current knowledge of which school students are most at risk of illicit drug-related harm. To investigate potential differential risk, the prevalence and patterns of illicit drug use of Australian secondary school students were examined according to demographic, school, economic, and licit drug use factors. Design and methods: Analyses were conducted on the 2005 Australian Secondary Students’ Alcohol and Drug (ASSAD) survey. A total of 21,805 secondary school students aged 12-17 from 376 schools completed the pencil and paper classroom questionnaire. Results: The greatest risk factors for students using illicit drugs were tobacco and alcohol use. Students with self-rated below average academic achievement, with more than $20 a week of disposable income, and who were Indigenous were more likely to report illicit drug use. Discussion and conclusions: While causal pathways could not be examined in the current data, and these relationships are likely to be complex and multi-directional, the findings indicate potentially at-risk populations who warrant extra support to address illicit drug-related harm

    The first census of homeless persons in Ireland.

    Get PDF

    Drug use in Ireland & Northern Ireland 2006/2007: drug prevalence survey bulletin 2: Regional Drugs Task Force (Ireland) & Health and Social Services Board (Northern Ireland) results.

    Get PDF
    This bulletin presents key findings at a local level from the second drug prevalence survey of households in both Ireland and Northern Ireland. The survey sampled a representative number of people aged between 15 and 64 during late 2006 and early 2007. The survey was carried out by Ipsos MORI in Ireland and by the Central Survey Unit of the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency in Northern Ireland according to standards set by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).This bulletin presents results relating to drug prevalence on a lifetime, last year (recent) and last month (current) basis for illegal and other drugs including alcohol and tobacco for each Regional Drug Task Force Area (former Health Board areas) in Ireland, and Health and Social Service Board (HSSB) in Northern Ireland
    corecore