Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cognitively Targeted Transperineal Biopsy in Patients With Previous Abdominoperineal Resection and Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with a combination of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal ultrasound biopsy for evaluating the prostate in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) who have previously undergone abdominoperineal resection (APR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 11 patients with a history of APR and clinical suspicion of prostate cancer due to elevated PSA levels over a 5-year period. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI at our institution prior to biopsy. MR diagnoses were validated either by transperineal ultrasound biopsy (Likert 3-5) guided by visual registration or clinical follow-up >6 months (Likert 1-2). RESULTS: All 7 cases with highly suspicious lesions (Likert 4-5) on MRI demonstrated cancer-1 case of Gleason 3 + 3 and 6 cases of Gleason ≥3 + 4 disease. Two cases with Likert 3 MR lesions revealed benign tissue upon biopsy. Two patients with no suspicious lesions on MRI were followed-up clinically, with PSA levels remaining stable over a mean period of 17.5 months (range 7-28 months). CONCLUSION: The use of prebiopsy multiparametric prostate MRI and subsequent cognitively targeted transperineal biopsy guided by visual registration can aid in the diagnostic pathway of patients with APR and a suspicion of prostate cancer.Author 1 has received a research grant from RWTH Aachen University Hospital (Aachen, Germany). Author 6 acknowledges support from Cancer Research UK, National Institute of Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cancer Research UK and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester and the Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.03

Real-time virtual sonography in gynecology & obstetrics. literature's analysis and case series

Fusion Imaging is a latest generation diagnostic technique, designed to combine ultrasonography with a second-tier technique such as magnetic resonance imaging and computer tomography. It has been mainly used until now in urology and hepatology. Concerning gynecology and obstetrics, the studies mostly focus on the diagnosis of prenatal disease, benign pathology and cervical cancer. We provided a systematic review of the literature with the latest publications regarding the role of Fusion technology in gynecological and obstetrics fields and we also described a case series of six emblematic patients enrolled from Gynecology Department of Sant ‘Andrea Hospital, “la Sapienza”, Rome, evaluated with Esaote Virtual Navigator equipment. We consider that Fusion Imaging could add values at the diagnosis of various gynecological and obstetrics conditions, but further studies are needed to better define and improve the role of this fascinating diagnostic tool

Toward optimization of target planning for magnetic resonance image-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion prostate biopsy

The current clinical standard for diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is 2D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy. However, this procedure has a false negative rate of 21-47% and therefore many patients return for repeat biopsies. A potential solution for improving upon this problem is “fusion” biopsy, where magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for PCa detection and localization prior to biopsy. In this procedure, tumours are delineated on pre-procedural MRI and registered to the 3D TRUS needle guidance modality. However, fusion biopsy continues to yield false negative results and there remains a gap in knowledge regarding biopsy needle target selection. Within-tumour needle targets are currently chosen ad hoc by the operating clinician without accounting for guidance system and registration errors. The objective of this thesis was to investigate how the choice of target selection strategy and number of biopsy attempts made per lesion may affect PCa diagnosis in the presence of needle delivery error. A fusion prostate biopsy simulation software platform was developed, which allowed for the investigation of how needle delivery error affects PCa diagnosis and cancer burden estimation. Initial work was conducted using 3D lesions contoured on MRI by collaborating radiologists. The results indicated that more than one core must be taken from the majority of lesions to achieve a sampling probability 95% for a biopsy system with needle delivery error ≥ 3.5 mm. Furthermore, it was observed that the optimal targeting scheme depends on the relative levels of systematic and random needle delivery errors inherent to the specific fusion biopsy system. Lastly, PCa tumours contoured on digital histology images by genitourinary pathologists were used to conduct biopsy simulations. The results demonstrated that needle delivery error has a substantial impact on the biopsy core involvement observed, and that targeting of high-grade lesions may result in higher core involvement variability compared with lesions of all grades. This work represents a first step toward improving the manner in which lesions are targeted using fusion biopsy. Successful integration of these findings into current fusion biopsy system operation could lead to earlier PCa diagnosis with the need for fewer repeat biopsy procedures

Когнитивная мпМРТ/ТРУЗИ fusion-биопсия предстательной железы с использованием компрессионной соноэластографии

Purpose. To evaluate the effectiveness of prostate cancer detection with method of cognitive mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy using strain sonoelastography.Materials and methods. Cognitive transrectal fusion biopsy of prostate was performed in 32 patients. According to the data of a preliminary conducted mpMRI, 33 foci suspicious of prostate cancer were included (PIRADSv2 = 3–5). Before the biopsy, all patients underwent ultrasound planning using compression sonoelastography.Results. The overall sensitivity was 76% for the targeted biopsy, and 49% for systematic biopsy. The number of biopsy specimens with a clinically significant Gleason grade in the targeted biopsy group was 85% of all columns with cancer specimens, in the systematic biopsy group this number was 68%. On average, the Gleason grade after targeted biopsy was 7.5 ± 0.9, and it was 7.2 ± 0.9 in the columns after systematic biopsy. On average, the percentage of tumor in the columns after targeted biopsy was 72% ± 29% and it was 55% ± 35% in the columns after systematic biopsy. The false positive for mpMRI was 15%. The overall sensitivity for the strain sonoelastography was 69% in this study, clinically significant cancer was detected in 71% of all columns with cancer specimens. False positive for elastography was observed in 18% of cases.Conclusion. Comparing with systematic biopsy, cognitive mpMRI / TRUS fusion biopsy can improve the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer and reduce the number of detected cases of clinically insignificant cancer. In cases of a total or subtotal tumor lesion in the peripheral zone detected on mpMRI, it is possible to take fewer columns for morphological verification of the tumor. The use of compression sonoelastography as an additional parameter of navigation in cognitive mpMRI/TRUS fusion biopsy can be considered as a promising way to increase the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer.Цель иследования: оценка эффективности обнаружения рака предстательной железы методом когнитивной мпМРТ/ТРУЗИ fusion-биопсии предстательной железы, в том числе с использованием компрессионной соноэластографии.Материал и методы. Когнитивная трансректальная fusion-биопсия предстательной железы проведена 32 п ациентам. По данным предварительно проведенной мпМРТ заподозрено 33 очага, подозрительных на рак предстательной железы (PI-RADSv2 = 3–5). Перед биопсией всем пациентам было выполнено ультразвуковое планирование с использованием компрессионной соноэластографии. Оценка результатов точности производилась по данным патоморфологического исследования биоптатов предстательной железы.Результаты. Общая чувствительность прицельной биопсии составила 76%, системной – 49%. Количество биоптатов с клинически значимой суммой Глисона в группе прицельной биопсии – 85% от столбиков с выявленной опухолью, в группе системной биопсии – 68%. В среднем сумма Глисона в прицельных столбиках – 7,5 ± 0,9, в системных – 7,2 ± 0,9. В среднем в прицельных столбиках процент опухоли составил 72,0 ± 29%, в системных – 55± 35%. При этом суммарный ложноположительный результат мпМРТ составил 15%. Общая чувствительность компрессионной соноэластографии в выявлении опухолевого очага составила 69%, клинически значимый рак выявлен в 71% всех столбиков с обнаруженной карциномой. Ложноположительный результат эластографии наблюдался в 18% случаев.Заключение. Когнитивная мпМРТ/ТРУЗИ fusionбиопсия способна улучшить обнаружение клинически значимого рака предстательной железы и уменьшить количество выявленных случаев клинически незначимого рака по сравнению с системной биопсией. При тотальном или субтотальном опухолевом поражении по данным мпМРТ для морфологической верификации опухоли возможно взятие меньшего количества столбиков. Применение компрессионной соноэластографии как дополнительного параметра навигации при когнитивной мпМРТ/ТРУЗИ fusion-биопсии может рассматриваться как перспективный способ повышения выявляемости клинически значимого рака предстательной железы

MRI-directed cognitive fusion-guided biopsy of the anterior prostate tumors

PURPOSE:We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed cognitive fusion transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided anterior prostate biopsy for diagnosis of anterior prostate tumors and to illustrate this technique.METHODS:A total of 39 patients with previous negative TRUS biopsy, but high clinical suspicion of occult prostate cancer, prospectively underwent prostate MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Patients with a suspicious anterior lesion on MRI underwent targeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy with cognitive fusion technique using sagittal probe orientation. PIRADS version 1 scores (T2, DWI, and overall), lesion size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and prostate gland volume were compared between positive and negative biopsy groups and between clinically significant cancer and remaining cases. Logistic regression analysis of imaging parameters and prostate cancer diagnosis was performed.RESULTS:Anterior gland prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 18 patients (46.2%) on targeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy. Clinically significant prostate cancer was diagnosed in 13 patients (33.3%). MRI lesion size, T2, DWI, and overall PIRADS scores were significantly higher in patients with positive targeted biopsies and those with clinically significant cancer (P < 0.05). Biopsies were positive in 90%, 33%, and 29% of patients with overall PIRADS scores of 5, 4, and 3 respectively. Overall PIRADS score was an independent predictor of all prostate cancer diagnosis and of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis.CONCLUSION:Targeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy with MRI-directed cognitive fusion enables accurate sampling and may improve tumor detection yield of anterior prostate cancer

A critical comparison of techniques for MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate

MRI-targeted biopsy is a promising technique that offers an improved detection of clinically significant prostate cancer over standard non-targeted biopsy. It is established that prostate MRI is of use in both the primary and repeat biopsy setting for the detection of significant prostate cancer. There are three approaches to targeting biopsies to areas of interest seen on prostate MRI. They each rely on the acquisition and reporting of a diagnostic quality multi-parametric MRI scan used to identify areas of interest, and the subsequent use of those diagnostic quality images in combination with real-time images of the prostate during the biopsy procedure. The three techniques are: visual registration of the MRI images with a real-time ultrasound image; software-assisted fusion of the MRI images and the real-time ultrasound images, and in-bore biopsy, which requires registration of a diagnostic quality MRI scan with a real time interventional MRI image. In this paper we compare the three techniques and evaluate those studies where there is a direct comparison of more than one MRI-targeting technique. PubMed was searched from inception to November 2016 using the search terms (cognitive registration OR visual registration OR fusion biopsy OR in-bore biopsy OR targeted biopsy) AND (prostate cancer OR prostate adenocarcinoma OR prostate carcinoma OR prostatic carcinoma OR prostatic adenocarcinoma) AND (MRI OR NMR OR magnetic resonance imaging OR mpMRI OR multiparametric MRI). The initial search included 731 abstracts. Eleven full text papers directly compared two or more techniques of MRI-targeting, and were selected for inclusion. The detection of clinically significant prostate cancer varied from 0% to 93.3% for visual registration, 23.2% to 100% for software-assisted registration and 29% to 80% for in-bore biopsy. Detection rates for clinically significant cancer are dependent on the prevalence of cancer within the population biopsied, which in turn is determined by the selection criteria [biopsy naïve, previous negative biopsy, prostate specific antigen (PSA) selection criteria, presence of a lesion on MRI]. Cancer detection rates varied more between study populations than between biopsy approaches. Currently there is no consensus on which type of MRI-targeted biopsy performs better in a given setting. Although there have been studies supporting each of the three techniques, substantial differences in methodology and reporting the findings make it difficult to reliably compare their outcomes

Histological outcomes after focal high‐intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapy

Introduction Focal therapy has increasingly become an accepted treatment option for patients with localised pros- tate cancer. Most follow-up protocols use a mixture of pro- tocol biopsies or “for cause” biopsies triggered by a rising PSA. In this paper, we discuss the histological outcomes from these biopsies and their use in guiding subsequent management and trial development. Methods We conducted a literature search and reviewed the post-treatment biopsy results from studies on focal HIFU and focal cryotherapy. We subsequently reviewed the results of three recently published consensus statements released discussing many of the issues concerning focal therapy. Results Research suggests that 1 in 5 of all post-treat- ment biopsies after focal therapy are positive. However, the majority of these seemed to be from the untreated por- tion of the gland or met criteria for clinically insignificant disease. The histological outcomes from focal therapy are promising and confirm its effectiveness in the short to medium term. Furthermore re-treatment is possible whilst maintaining a low-side-effect profile. Conclusion Debate is ongoing about the clinical signifi- cance of various levels of residual disease after focal ther- apy and the exact threshold at which to call failure within a patient who has had focal therapy

Prostate cancer diagnostic pathway: Is a one-stop cognitive MRI targeted biopsy service a realistic goal in everyday practice? A pilot cohort in a tertiary referral centre in the UK

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility of a novel multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and cognitive fusion transperineal targeted biopsy (MRTB) led prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic service with regard to cancer detection and reducing time to diagnosis and treatment. Design Consecutive men being investigated for possible PCa under the UK 2-week wait guidelines. Setting Tertiary referral centre for PCa in the UK. Participants Men referred with a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination between February 2015 and March 2016 under the UK 2-week rule guideline. Interventions An mpMRI was performed prior to patients attending clinic, on the same day. If required, MRTB was offered. Results were available within 48 hours and discussed at a specialist multidisciplinary team meeting. Patients returned for counselling within 7 days Primary and secondary outcome measures Outcome measures in this regard included the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients referred with a suspicion of PCa. Quality control outcome measures included clinically significant and total cancer detection rates. Results 112 men were referred to the service. 111 (99.1%) underwent mpMRI. Median PSA was 9.4 ng/mL (IQR 5.6–21.0). 87 patients had a target on mpMRI with 25 scoring Likert 3/5 for likelihood of disease, 26 4/5 and 36 5/5. 57 (51%) patients received a local anaesthetic, Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (MRTB). Cancer was detected in 45 (79%). 43 (96%) had University College London definition 2 disease or greater. The times to diagnosis and treatment were a median of 8 and 20 days, respectively. Conclusions This approach greatly reduces the time to diagnosis and treatment. Detection rates of significant cancer are high. Similar services may be valuable to patients with a potential diagnosis of PCa