179 research outputs found
ããçè·å°éçè·åž«ãè²æããããã®é²åŠåã«ãããçè·ç®¡çè ã®æ¯æŽ
ç®çïŒããCNSã¯å€æ§ãªåœ¹å²ãæåŸ
ãããŠããé²åŠããåããèšç»çã«æ¯æŽãããããšãå¹æçãšèããããããã®ããå®éã«çè·ç®¡çè
ããããªã£ãŠããæ¯æŽãšä»åŸå¿
èŠãšèããæ¯æŽã«ã€ããŠæããã«ãããæ¹æ³ïŒå¯Ÿè±¡ã¯ããCNSã«å¯ŸããŠé²åŠåã«æ¯æŽããããªã£ãçµéšã®ããçè·ç®¡çè
9åãšããã質çèšè¿°çç 究ãšããŠåæ§é åé¢æ¥æ³ããããªã£ããçµæïŒé²åŠåã«ãããªã£ãæ¯æŽã¯ïŒé²åŠãžã®åæ©ã¥ããããïŒïŒçè·å®è·µåãé«ããæ©äŒãäœãïŒïŒåéšãžç°å¢èª¿æŽãããïŒãå«ã6ã«ããŽãªãå¿
èŠãšèããŠããæ¯æŽã§ã¯ïŒå®å¿ããŠé²åŠã§ããå¶åºŠãäœãïŒãå«ã2ã«ããŽãªã§ãã£ããèå¯ïŒé²åŠã«å¯ŸããŠåæ©ã¥ããããé²åŠãžã®èŠæãäœãããšããããŠé²åŠãããŸã§ã«çè·å®è·µåãã€ããããšã§æºåããããªã£ãŠããããŸãé²åŠåŸã®ç掻ãä¿éããããã®çµæžçåºç€ã圢æããå¿
èŠæ§ããããé²åŠåããä¿®äºåŸã®åœ¹å²ãŸã§èŠæ®ããŠæ¯æŽããããªã£ãŠããããšãæããã«ãªã£ããObjective: CNS is expected to have various roles, and it is considered effective to develop human resources systematically. Therefore, we will clarify the support provided for admission to graduate school for nursing managers and the support that they consider necessary in the future. Method: The subjects were nine nursing managers who had experience in supporting CNS before graduate school. A semi-structured interview was conducted as a qualitative descriptive study. Results: The support provided for admission to graduate school was in six categories, including . There were two categories of support that we thought were necessary, including [creating a system that allows students to go on safely]. Conclusion: They were preparing by motivating and preparing to go on to higher education, and getting nursing practice skills before going on to school. There is also a need to form an economic foundation to guarantee life after going on to graduate school. Before proceeding to graduate school, it became clear that nursing manager was expecting at their role in the hospital after graduation
ãã©ã³ãç±³ç²ãæž æ°Žã£ç²ãã®2çš®é¡ã®ç²ã®æåãšèª¿çç¹æ§
é«æ§»åžæž
æ°Žå°åç£éå®ã®ãã©ã³ãç±³ç²ãæž
æ°Žã£ç²ãã®ã°ã«ãã³ããªãŒãšã°ã«ãã³æ·»å ïŒä»¥äžãSãšSGïŒã®æåãšèª¿çç¹æ§ããè¿é£å°åJA ã®ç±³ç²ã®ã°ã«ãã³ããªãŒãšã°ã«ãã³æ·»å ïŒä»¥äžãTãšTGïŒãšæ¯èŒãããããã±ã質å«éã¯ãSãTãã0.7%äœãã£ãããSGã¯TGãã1.7%é«ããSGã®ã°ã«ãã³æ·»å éãTGããå€ãããšã瀺åããããSãšTã®ãšãŠçŽ åžåæ²ç·ã¯é¡äŒŒããŠããããç²ååŸååžïŒã¡ãã£ã¢ã³åŸïŒã¯SãTããå°ããïŒ41.1ÎŒmïŒ69.3ÎŒmïŒãæå·æŸ±ç²éã¯SãTããå°ãªãã£ãïŒ6.1%, 8.4%ïŒãSGã§çŒããé£ãã³ã¯ãTGããèšåãåéæ§ã倧ããã£ãïŒp<0.01ïŒã補ãã³æ§ã®éãã¯ã柱ç²ç²ååŸãšã°ã«ãã³éã圱é¿ããŠãããšèãããããã°ã«ãã³ããªãŒç±³ç²æžæ¿æ¶²ã®ç²åºŠïŒ40âïŒã§ã¯ãSã¯æ¿åºŠ14%ãã46%ãŸã§ã¯ã»ãšãã©äžæãããæå·æŸ±ç²éãå°ãªãããšãåæ ããŠãããSãšTã®åæç±³ã«å€§ããªéãã¯ãªãã補ç²æ¹æ³ã«ãã£ãŠèª¿çç¹æ§ã®éããçãããšæããããThe composition of two types of brand rice flour âShimizukkoâ, one gluten -free and one with gluten (indicated by S and SG), and their cooking characteristics were analyzed and compared with two types of rice flour (T and TG) produced by the neighborhood JA (Japan Agricultural Cooperatives). S contained 0.7% lower protein content than T, but the protein content of SG was 1.7% higher than TG. It suggested that more gluten was added to SG than to TG. The particle distribution profile of S demonstrated a smaller median particle size (41.1ÎŒm) in comparison to T (69.3ÎŒm). The damaged starch content of S was less than T (6.1%, 8.4%). The one loaf of bread made from SG indicated a larger specific volume and larger cohesiveness than the TG one. It was considered that the dif ference in the property of the bread was influenced by the starch particle size and the amount of gluten. The viscosities (40â) of gluten-free rice flour suspensions demonstrated that those of S hardly increased from 14% to 46% rice content, reflecting the smaller amount of damaged starch content. In conclusion, the differences found in cooking characteristics may due to differences in milling methods
ãã©ã¯ã¿ã«CAãã¿ãŒã³ã掻çšãããã¡ãã·ã§ã³ãã¶ã€ã³
æ¬ç 究ã§ã¯ïŒãã©ã¯ã¿ã«æ§é ãæã€ã»ã«ã»ãªãŒãããã³ïŒä»¥äžïŒCAãšããïŒã«ããçæããããã¿ãŒã³ã掻çšããŠããã¹ã¿ã€ã«ãã¶ã€ã³ãäœæãïŒãã®åžãçšãããã¬ã¹å¶äœã«ãããã¡ãã·ã§ã³ã·ã§ãŒãå±éããŠïŒãã©ã¯ã¿ã«CAãã¿ãŒã³ã®çŸç䟡å€ãšå¿çšã®å¯èœæ§ãæããã«ããïŒãã©ã¯ã¿ã«CAãã¿ãŒã³ã¯ããã©ã¯ã¿ã«æ§é ãæã€ã»ã«ã»ãªãŒãããã³ãã«é¢ããç 究ã®ææã®äžã€ã§ãããœãããŠã§ã¢âãã©ã¯ã¿ã«ãã¿ãŒã³ãžã§ãã¬ãŒã¿âã§çæããïŒè²ã®éžå®ã¯ãæ空ããã€ã¡ãŒãžãïŒé系統ãããŒã¹ã«ã©ãŒïŒãã³ã¯ãšã€ãšããŒãã¢ã¯ã»ã³ãã«ã©ãŒãšããŠçšãïŒ16å€ã®ãã©ã¯ã¿ã«CA(ã¬ãã«8ïŒ512Ã512 ããã)ã§9çš®é¡ã®ç°ãªããã¿ãŒã³ãéžå®ããïŒããããããã¹ã¿ã€ã«ã«å°å·ãïŒã¢ã¯ãã£ãã©ãŒãã³ã°ãšããŠåŠçãè¡£è£
å¶äœã«åãçµãã ïŒãã¬ã¹ã®ãã¶ã€ã³ã«ããã©ã¯ã¿ã«ã®ç¹åŸŽã§ããèªå·±çžäŒŒæ§ãåãå
¥ãïŒãã¹ã¿ãŒå¶äœããã¡ãã·ã§ã³ã·ã§ãŒã®èæ¯æ åã«ãçæãããã©ã¯ã¿ã«CA ãã¿ãŒã³ã掻çšããïŒçµæãšããŠïŒæ§ã
ãªåéã«å¿çšãæåŸ
ããããã©ã¯ã¿ã«çè«ããã¡ãã·ã§ã³ãã¶ã€ã³åéã«ã掻çšã§ããããšãå®èšŒã§ãã
Sharing Things(ïŒ)ïŒ Collaborative Agents in Free Improvisation
Reading Karen Barad was like finding a how-to guide for destabilizing the classical, solidity-based metaphysics which have long oriented humanist ontology and characterized the world as a deterministic and categorizable variety of stable, isolated, individualized, atomized me\u27s, you\u27s and them\u27s. The nonsense of this âcommonsenseâ has long seemed obvious to me, easily evidenced by even the most common transmaterialisations that facilitate life--such as eating, breathing, interacting, etc. Eating, for example, obviously brings about profound changes in both my body and the object I might eat. Things together with things become different, undermining notions of independence and making the idea of stable individualization seem absurd. From Barad\u27s methods for revealing and analyzing a more subtle, accurate and undeterminable ontology of intra-actively becoming and entangled agents, I took away the implication that everything is involved, always has been and can\u27t not be. Or, rather, nothing exists and everything proves it. Human and nonhuman agents engage in collaborative entanglements, bringing about becoming. Notions like this made me excited to test Barad\u27s ideas in analyzing the art practice that I know most deeply: freely improvised music. Practitioners of free improvisation often describe it with terms like âbecoming oneâ or âsharing the moment.â However, Barad provides language for examining collaborations (both human and non-human) with greater nuance and clarity, but also provides a means by which to venture beyond humanist-centered ontologies and explore realms of objects. Thus, in this article, using Barad\u27s and Object Oriented Ontological concepts as tools for building experimental apparatuses, I do a detailed analysis of an entanglement between a human and non-human object (specifically, me improvising with a tenor saxophone). With this serving as something of a case study in post-humanist ontology, my examination expands in order to more generally explore how human and non-human agents intra-act in collaborative becoming, and how this awareness provides potential ways for exceeding the human-centered constructs that delegitimize the body in general and individual becoming bodies in particular. The results, I argue, are that bodies can\u27t not possess the autonomy and openness that humanism tries to reduce into its determined and classified roles of purpose and meaning. As well, I argue that bodies can only be understood as individuals in both form and time
å·ã€ããªã女çã®è»¢èŠæ§ ïŒ ãããŒãžã§ãªãã³ã¯ã¹å¬¢ãè
ããŒã¬ã¬ããã»ãªãªãã¡ã³ãã¯é·å¹Žã¢ã³ãã»ãã§ããã¹ããšèŠåãããŠããããã®æ ¹æ ãšãããã®ã¯ãäžã€ã«ã¯ãžã§ã³ã»ã¹ãã¥ã¯ãŒãã»ãã«ã®å¥³æ§åæ¿æš©ã®äž»åŒµãæ¹å€ããããšã§ããããŸããåæ代ã®äœå®¶ããŒãã¹ã»ããŒãã£ã®ãæ¥é°è
ãžã¥ãŒãããžã®æªåé«ãéé£ã§ããããããã50 幎ãšããé·ãäœå®¶äººçã®äžã§ããªãªãã¡ã³ãã®âWomenâs Questionsâã«å¯Ÿãã姿å¢ã¯çµå§äžè²«ãããã®ã§ã¯ãªãã£ããè¿å¹Žããªãªãã¡ã³ãç 究ãæ·±ãŸããèŠãããªããã¢ã³ãã»ãã§ããã¹ããšããè©äŸ¡ãçåèŠãããããã«ãªã£ãŠããŠããããªãªãã¡ã³ããè«ãããšããåžžã«åé¡ãšãªãã®ã¯ãžã§ã³ããŒã»ããªãã£ã¯ã¹ãããã圌女ã®å§¿å¢ã§ãããæ¬çš¿ã§ã¯ããªãªãã¡ã³ãã®ä»£è¡šäœããããŒãžã§ãªãã³ã¯ã¹å¬¢ããåãäžããã¢ãã¯ããã€ãã¯ããããã£ãçšããŠæãããããã€ã³ãã«ãŒã·ã©ã®éå¿ãéžæã«ã€ããŠã®èå¯ãéããŠããã®å°èª¬ãäŒçµ±çãªå¥³æ§åãèŠãåãæã£ãŠããããšãæããã«ããããMargaret Oliphant has long been considered as a conservative and antifeminist writer, partly because of her malicious reference to John Stuart Millâs idea of womenâs suffrage and partly because of her notorious attack on Thomas Hardyâs Jude the Obscure. However, it is true that her 50-year prolific career makes it nearly impossible to find a consistency to contemporary womenâs questions in her works. Recent critics have reevaluated this long-dismissed author and begun to challenge the label as an antifeminist. The recurrent topic concerning Oliphant is her attitudes to gender politics: Was she an antifeminist or a feminist? In this essay, I examine how the ironic narrator describes the eponymous heroine, Lucilla with mock-heroic metaphors and parodies in Oliphantâs masterpiece, Miss Marjoribanks. Considering the heroineâs ambitions and choices reveals that this novel has a subversive power to the Victorian conventional women
èªç¥çé«éœ¢è ã«å¯Ÿããæ粟ç¥ç è¬ã®äœ¿çšããããèªè : èªç¥çé«éœ¢è ã®æ²»çãšã±ã¢ã«æºããå»çã»ä»è·è·ã®èªç±èšè¿°åæ
èªç¥çé«éœ¢è
ã®BPSDã«å¯Ÿããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬ã®äœ¿çšããããå»çã»ä»è·è·ã®èªèãæããã«ããããã«ãèªèšåŒè³ªåçŽã§æ粟ç¥ç
è¬ã®äœ¿çšã«å¯Ÿããèãã«ã€ããŠèªç±èšèŒãæ±ãã質çèšè¿°çã«åæãè¡ã£ããçµæããã±ã¢ã ãã§å®å
šã»å®å¯§ã確ä¿ããããšã®å°é£æ§ããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬äœ¿çšäžã®ã¡ãªããããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬ã«ããæ²»çã®å°é£æ§ããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬äœ¿çšã®æ¡ä»¶ããå»åž«ã«ããåŠæ¹ã®éããšé©åãªåŠæ¹ã®å¿
èŠæ§ããå€è·çš®ã«ããé£æºã»ååã®å¿
èŠæ§ããè¬ã«é Œããªãã±ã¢ã®éèŠæ§ããã¹ã¿ããã®ç¥èãæè¡äžè¶³ã«é¢é£ããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬ã®äœ¿çšãšæè²ã®å¿
èŠæ§ãããã³ãã¯ãŒäžè¶³ã«é¢é£ããåå¥å¯Ÿå¿ã®å°é£æ§ãšäººå¡é
眮åºæºãèŠçŽãå¿
èŠæ§ãã家æã«å¯Ÿããæè²ãšãµããŒãã®å¿
èŠæ§ããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬ã®äœ¿çšãããããžã¬ã³ããã®11ã«ããŽãªã«åé¡ããããèªç¥çé«éœ¢è
ã®BPSDã«å¯Ÿããæ粟ç¥ç
è¬ã®äœ¿çšãæå°éã«ããããã«ããéè¬ç©çæ³ãšã±ã¢ã®å
å®ãå³ãããšã®éèŠæ§ã瀺åããããThe aim of this study is to identify perceptions of the use of psychotropic drugs among caregivers as well as medical staff working for dementia care units in psychiatric hospitals. An open-ended question which is part of our original questionnaire was analyzed by qualitative content analysis. eleven categories emerged from the data and the main categories are: 1) the difficulty of maintaining the safety / well-being of patients by care alone, 2) the advantages of the use of psychotropic drugs, 3) the difficulty in psychiatric drug treatment, 4)the condition in which the psychotropic drugs are given at hospital, 5) the need of appropriate prescribing, and the different prescription among doctors, 6) the need for cooperation / collaboration by multi-disciplinary staff, 7) the importance of care not depending on medicine, 8) the use of psychiatric drug related to the lack of knowledge and skills among staff, and the needs of education,9) the difficulty in Individual care due to staff shortages, 10) the needs of education and supports for family caregivers, 11) the interpretation and dilemma of the use of the antipsychotic medication. The result indicated the necessity to improve the appropriateness of psychotropic drug prescription as well as the importance of nonpharmacological interventions
å°åçŠç¥è«ã«ãããæ å ±ã®äœçœ®ã¥ãã«é¢ããç 究
æ¬ç 究ã§ã¯ãå°åçŠç¥ã«ãããæ
å ±ã®éèŠæ§ãæããã«ããããã«ããå°åçŠç¥ã®4 ã€ã®å¿å軞ãã«åãäžããããåè«ãšãåŸçºã®å°åçŠç¥æ
å ±è«ã®é¢é£ã«ã€ããŠç³»çµ±çã«åæããããã®çµæãå°åçŠç¥è«ã«ãããæ
å ±ã®äœçœ®ã¥ãã¯ãè¡æ¿ãªã©ã«ãããµãŒãã¹æ
å ±ã·ã¹ãã ãäœæ°åãã®æ
å ±æäŸãµãŒãã¹ãªã©ãšãäœæ°ãªã©ã«ããäž»äœçãªæ
å ±æŽ»çšã«å€§å¥ãããããšãæããã«ãªã£ãããŸããçŠç¥æ
å ±åã®é²å±ã«ãã£ãŠãããã£ãŠæ
å ±æ Œå·®ãåºããããšãããçŠç¥ãµãŒãã¹ã®å©çšè
ãªã©ã«æ
å ±åŒ±è
ãå€ãå«ãŸããŠãããšããåé¡ãããããã®æ ¹åºã«ã¯ãç掻ä¿è·ãªã©ã®çŠç¥ãµãŒãã¹ã«ä»éããå£çåŠéççŠç¥èŠ³ãããããšãã«ãããã¡ãã£ã¢ãããã«æ¡æ£ãããŠããããããã£ãŠãçŠç¥æ
å ±ãç確ã«åæããŠæŽ»çšã§ããèœåãæããçŠç¥æ
å ±æŽ»çšäž»äœã圢æããããã«ãçŠç¥æè²ãšã¡ãã£ã¢ã»ãªãã©ã·ãŒãçµ±åããŠçŠç¥ã¡ãã£ã¢ã»ãªãã©ã·ãŒã®æ¹æ³è«ã確ç«ããããšãä»åŸã®èª²é¡ãšãªã
- âŠ