874 research outputs found

    Nutritional structure and associated factors in type 2 diabetic patients

    No full text
    Background: The actual structure of nutrition and associated factors in the Russian type 2Β diabetic patients have not been systematically evaluated.Aim: To assess type 2Β patients' perceptions of the diet recommendations given by their doctors, how do they deflect in the actual nutrition structure depending on demographic, medical and social factors.Materials and methods: 297Β  out- and in-patients with type 2Β diabetes mellitus were consecutively recruited into this cross-sectional study (mean age Β± standart deviation, 61.0 Β± 10.1Β years, with duration of diabetes from 1 to 35Β  years). 21%Β of the patients were treated with the diet only, 53%, with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA), 26%, with insulin or insulin + OHA. In addition to their comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessment, the patients filled in the following questionnaires: 1) to assess their obstacles and barriers with diabetes treatment; 2) to assess the diet recommendations and factors that might influence their choice of foods; 3) to assess the nutritional structure. The data is given as mean Β± standard deviation.Results: Diet was chosen as the most challenging aspect of diabetes treatment by 53%Β of patients, whereas insulin therapy was found to be most challenging by 12%Β of them, blood glucose self-monitoring by 10%Β and OHA treatment by 4%. The patient's diet is influenced most of all by recommendations given by their doctors (66%), with tastes and nutritional habits of the patients ranking second (48%), their well-being rankingΒ 3rd (43%), and food costs rankingΒ 4th (40%) with aΒ small difference with theΒ 3rd. The analysis of patients' understanding of the diet components and evaluation of their actual nutritional structure showed their non-concordance with current evidenced-based approaches to medical nutrition. The patient's nutrition is dominated by exclusion of fast-absorbable carbohydrates and total carbohydrate restriction, as well as by an excessive intake of vegetable oils and unfounded restraint from fried and spicy foods. Total daily caloric intake was reduced only by 37%Β of the patients. The patients undervalue the necessity of increased fiber intake. The group of very highly consumed foods (β‰₯ 75%Β of the patients) included vegetable oils (84.0%), soft drinks (82.9%) and dairy products (78.9%). The group of highly consumed foods (50–74% of the patients) included soups (72.6%), meat, fish and poultry (70.5%), grains and cereals (total, 69.9%), vegetables, greenery and beans (68.9%), potatoes (58.9%), and fruits and berries (52.2%). The group of moderately consumed foods (25–49% of the patients) included bread and bakery products (44.5%) and eggs (27.9%), whereas the least consumed (< 25% of the patients) were β€œdiabetic foods” (19.4%), pasta (17.1%), fat sauces and cream (21.4%), butter and lard (15.7%), nuts (14.5%), oils preserves and smoked foods (5.7%), and sweets (4.7%). The most unhealthy diet was typical for male patients, those of relatively young age, with short diabetes duration, with obesity and with lower educational level.Conclusion: Diet is seen by type 2Β diabetic patients as the most burdening treatment element. Nutritional structure of type 2Β diabetic patients, including those who have participated in the patient education programs, in many ways is not consistent with the current principles of rational medical nutrition and is determined first of all by recommendations of their doctors that are not always optimal. The use of the questionnaire to assess nutritional structure and regularity allows to evaluate the diet style of aΒ given patient and, based on it, to elaborate corrective measures and individual dietetic recommendations

    The potential and limitations of standard electrocardiography for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardias

    No full text
    The possibility to identify potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias by analysis of standard electrocardiography (ECG) parameters without the use of sophisticated and expensive diagnostic techniques, such as electrophysiological heart studies, has been an important achievement of the last decades. Current differential diagnostic methods for wide QRS complex tachycardias can be categorized into 4 groups: 1) identification the ECG signs diagnostic of ventricular tachycardia, such as atrioventricular dissociation and/or sinus captures and/or fusion QRS complexes; 2) analysis of the distinct morphological features of QRS complexes during wide QRS complex tachycardias; 3) analysis of the ECG characteristics in between wide QRS complex tachycardia attacks; 4) comparison of the morphological QRS features during wide QRS complex tachycardia and during sinus rhythm periods. The list of ECG algorithms for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardias has been growing and updated year after year; however, all of them have their limitations. Most frequently, the differential diagnosis between ventricular and aberrant supraventricular tachycardias is based on the morphological criteria of wide QRS complexes developed by H.J. Wellens et al., P. Brugada et al., M. Griffith et al., K.E. Kindwal et al., A. Vereckei et al. At the same time, there is a continuous search for new algorithms or criteria that could be easily used without decreased specificity and/or sensitivity of the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. The aim of this review is to comprehensively analyze the literature data and results of our own studies on the potential and limitation of standard ECG for the differential diagnosis of ventricular and various aberrant supraventricular tachycardias

    Π£Π”ΠΠ›Π•ΠΠ˜Π• Π’-ΠšΠ›Π•Π’ΠžΠ§ΠΠžΠ™ Π›Π˜ΠœΠ€ΠžΠœΠ« ΠŸΠ ΠΠ’Π«Π₯ ΠšΠΠœΠ•Π  БЕРДЦА И ΠŸΠ ΠžΠ’Π•Π—Π˜Π ΠžΠ’ΠΠΠ˜Π• Π’Π Π˜ΠšΠ£Π‘ΠŸΠ˜Π”ΠΠ›Π¬ΠΠžΠ“Πž ΠšΠ›ΠΠŸΠΠΠ Π£ Π’Π˜Π§-Π˜ΠΠ€Π˜Π¦Π˜Π ΠžΠ’ΠΠΠΠžΠ“Πž ΠŸΠΠ¦Π˜Π•ΠΠ’Π

    No full text
    Primary B-cell lymphoma of the heart is a rareΒ tumor. The authors presented a clinical case ofΒ a successful surgical treatment of primary rightΒ heart lymphoma in a HIV-infected patient. TheΒ use of modern diagnostic assessment methodsΒ and aggressive surgical strategies help to achieveΒ clinical effect in this patients’ category.ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½Π°Ρ Π’-клСточная Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΠΌΠ° сСрдца относится ΠΊ Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΈΠΌ опухолям. Авторы прСдставили клиничСский случай ΡƒΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ хирургичСской ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠΌΡ„ΠΎΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ² сСрдца Ρƒ Π’Π˜Π§-ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°. ИспользованиС соврСмСнных диагностичСских ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² исслСдования ΠΈ агрСссивной хирургичСской Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ позволяСт Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡ΡŒ клиничСского эффСкта Ρƒ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²

    ΠΠΠ’Π˜Π‘Π˜ΠžΠ’Π˜ΠšΠΠ‘Π‘ΠžΠ¦Π˜Π˜Π ΠžΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠ― Π”Π˜ΠΠ Π•Π― И ΠΠΠ’Π˜Π‘Π˜ΠžΠ’Π˜ΠšΠΠ‘Π‘ΠžΠ¦Π˜Π˜Π ΠžΠ’ΠΠΠΠ«Π• ΠšΠžΠ›Π˜Π’Π«

    No full text
    The article presents most recent data on antibiotic-associated intestinal disorders. The author reviews epidemiology and causative microorganisms in antibiotic-induced diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis as well as clinical variants of antibiotic-associated disorders. Diagnosis methods are decribed at length with special attention to most sensitive and informative tests. Treatment of different clinical variants of antibiotic-induced disorders is discussed in detail.Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ соврСмСнныС Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΎΠ± антибиотикассоциированных пораТСниях ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ вопросы эпидСмиологии ΠΈ этиологичСских ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² антибиотикассоциированной Π΄ΠΈΠ°Ρ€Π΅ΠΈ ΠΈ псСвдомСмбранозного ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π°. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ клиничСской ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ послС использования Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠŸΠΎΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎ Ρ€Π°ΡΡΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ диагностики с ΡƒΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Ρ‡ΡƒΠ²ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… тСстов. Π”Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Π±ΠΈΡ€Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ вопросы лСчСния Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π²Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² антибиотикассоциированных ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ

    PDX-модСль высокодиффСрСнцированной нСйроэндокринной ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ Π½Π° ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ°Ρ… Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ Balb/c Nude

    No full text
    Background: Orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDX) in immunodeficient mice are recognized as the most adequate neoplastic model due to their ability to maintain primary tumor properties after implantation. They can be used to study anti-neoplastic effects of pharmacological substances in vivo and to investigate characteristics and mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Results of preclinical studies of pharmacological substances obtained with PDX models are virtually no different from those of subsequent clinical trials. Aim: To develop an orthotopic PDX model of a highly differentiated human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) by implanting a fragment of the patient's tumor into the pancreas of immunodeficient mice. Materials and methods: A tumor fragment was obtained from a patient with a highly differentiated pNET G2 and liver metastasis. Fifteen (15) male immunodeficient Balb/c Nude mice with a mass of 22-24 grams were used to establish the orthotopic PDX model of human well-differentiated pNET. A fragment of primary pNET was orthotopically transplanted into the pancreas of 10 animals. A fragment of the metastatic lesion was transplanted into the liver of 5 animals. The animals were followed for up to 45 days. In vivo monitoring of the tumor growth was performed with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system (ClinScan, Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany). At the end of the experiment, animals were euthanized and autopsies were performed, with routine histopathological examination and immunohistochemical study with antibodies to human chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and the marker of proliferative activity (Ki-67) of both original donor tumor and orthotopic pancreatic and liver xenografts. Results: Obvious changes in the mice condition were noticed at 30 days after surgery. They manifested as an increase in abdominal distension, swelling, and cyanosis in the projection of the pancreas. MRI showed a homogeneous neoplasm in the pancreas. At autopsy, the engraftment rate was 73% of all study animals, with yellow masses with even contours and a volume of about 100 cm3 present within the yellow-pink pancreatic tissues. The morphological assessment showed histological similarity between the original patient's tumor and patient-derived xenografts, which were identified as highly differentiated G2 pNETs. At immunohistochemical assessment, the patient's primary and metastatic tumor tissue specimens expressed anti-chromogranin A (full-blown cytoplasmic reaction) and anti-synaptophysin (mild cytoplasmic reaction) antibodies. Ki-67 was positive in 5.2% of the cells. An immunohistochemical study of the orthotopic tumor fragments and heterotopic tumor fragments showed moderate cytoplasmic staining with antibodies to chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The rate of Ki-67 in the orthotopic pNET model and metastatic model does not exceed 5% and 8%, respectively. Conclusion: Engraftment of tumor material after transplantation of human pancreatic cancer was observed in 73% of the cases, which should be considered a good first passage implantation result. The morphological studies confirmed that the orthotopic PDX was a well-differentiated pNET, histologically corresponding to the donor tumor. The model created in the experiment mirrors the histological characteristics of the donor tumor and can be used in preclinical studies of new treatments for well-differentiated pNETs, including those of antitumor activity of new pharmacological substances.ΠΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ. ΠžΡ€Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ксСнограф-Ρ‚Ρ‹ чСловСчСских ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ (patient-derived xenograft - PDX) Π½Π° ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ°Ρ… ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Ρ‹ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π°Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ²Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ модСлью ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ процСсса благодаря способности ΡΠΎΡ…Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡ‚ΡŒ послС ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ свойства ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ. Они ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ для изучСния ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ дСйствия фармакологичСских субстанций in vivo, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ исслСдования особСнностСй ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠ°Π½Ρ†Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π°. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ доклиничСских исслСдований фармакологичСских субстанций, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π½Π° PDX-модСлях, практичСски Π½Π΅ разнятся с ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ клиничСскими испытаниями. ЦСль - созданиС ортотопичСской PDX-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ высокодиффСрСнцированной нСйроэндокринной ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ (НЭО) ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ (ΠŸΠ–) Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Ρ„Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π² ΠŸΠ– ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π€Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π» взят ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° с Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠΌ высокодиффСрСнцированной НЭО ΠŸΠ–, G2 с мСтастазом Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ. Для создания ортотопичСской PDX-ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ НЭО ΠŸΠ– Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΎ использовано 15 самцов ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ Balb/c Nude массой 22-24 Π³. Π€Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ НЭО ΠŸΠ– Π±Ρ‹Π» трансплантирован Π² ΠŸΠ– 10 ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ. Π€Ρ€Π°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ мСтастаза НЭО Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π» ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ 5 ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ. НаблюдСниС Π·Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 45 суток. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ наблюдСниС Π·Π° ростом ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡŒ с использованиСм Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ°Π³Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΎ-рСзонансном Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Ρ„Π΅ ClinScan. По ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‡Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ экспСримСнта осущСствляли ΡΠ²Ρ‚Π°Π½Π°Π·ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡŽ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ стандартноС гистологичСскоС ΠΈ иммуногистохимичСскоС исслСдованиС с Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ А, синаптофизину, ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Ρƒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ„Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ активности (Ki-67) чСловСчСской ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΈ ортотопичСских ксСнографтов Π² ΠŸΠ– ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π’ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Π΅ измСнСния Π² состоянии ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ спустя 30 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ послС ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ. Они Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ Π² ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ‚Π°, Π΅Π³ΠΎ припухлости ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½ΡŽΡˆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ Π² ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠŸΠ–. ΠœΠ°Π³Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΎ-рСзонансная томография ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»Π° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² области ΠŸΠ–. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ нСкропсии всСх исслСдованных ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΆΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Π° Π² 73% случаСв, ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ этом Π² ΠŸΠ– ΠΆΠ΅Π»Ρ‚ΠΎ-Ρ€ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ†Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ†Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° с Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ объСмом ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎ 100 ΠΌΠΌ3. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ морфологичСском Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ€Π° ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ гистологичСски схоТи ΠΈ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‹ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ высокодиффСрСнцированная НЭО ΠŸΠ–, G2. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ иммуногистохимичСском исслСдовании пСрвичная ΠΈ мСтастатичСская ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° экспрСссировали Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π° ΠΊ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈ-Π½Ρƒ А (Ρ€Π΅Π·ΠΊΠΎ выраТСнная цитоплазматичСская рСакция) ΠΈ синаптофизину (слабо выраТСнная цитоплазматичСская рСакция). Ki-67 Π±Ρ‹Π» ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π½ Π² 5,2% ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ иммуногистохимичСском исслСдовании ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ мСтастатичСской ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° выявлСна ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ выраТСнная цитоплазматичСская окраска с Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊ Ρ…Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ А ΠΈ синаптофизину. Ki-67 Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ НЭО ΠŸΠ– Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ°Π» 5%, Π° Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ мСтастаза Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ достигал 8%. Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅ трансплантации ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠŸΠ– Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‡Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΆΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Π° Π² 73% случаСв, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ слСдуСт ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ…ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡˆΠΈΠΌ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ для ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ пассаТа. Богласно Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ морфологичСских исслСдований, ортотопичСский ксСнографт, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°, являСтся высокодиффСрСнцированной НЭО ΠŸΠ–, G2, Ρ‚ΠΎ Π΅ΡΡ‚ΡŒ гистологичСски соотвСтствуСт ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°-Π΄ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡ€Π°. ΠŸΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π² нашСм экспСримСнтС модСль повторяСт гистологичСскиС особСнности донорской ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π½Π°ΠΉΡ‚ΠΈ своС ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² доклиничСских исслСдованиях Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² лСчСния высокодиффСрСнцированных НЭО ΠŸΠ–, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС Π² исслСдованиях ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ активности Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… фармакологичСских субстанций

    БиоимпСдансный Ρ„Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΠΉ ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠ» ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€ саркопСнии Ρƒ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ старчСского возраста с ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ

    No full text
    Rationale: The progressive decline in skeletal muscle strength and function during aging can lead to disability and premature death. It is of interest to evaluate the potential of bioimpedance phase angle (PhA) as an instrumental marker of sarcopenia in clinical practice.Aim: To identify an association between the phase angles determined by the bioimpedance analysis of body composition, with functional activity parameters in elderly women with multiple comorbidities.Materials and methods: The study included 146 elderly women (aged 75 to 84 years, mean age 79.44 Β± 2.56 years). Assessments consisted of the Charlson comorbidity index, β€œVozrast ne pomekha” (Age is not a hindrance) questionnaire, the Barthel index, the sit-to-stand five-repeat test, the standardized 4-meter walking speed test, and bioimpedance analysis of body composition (ABC-02, Medass, Russia). Muscle strength parameters were assessed by wrist dynamometry with a mechanical wrist dynamometer. The hand dynamometry index was calculated by dividing the hand grip strength by the patient's squared height. According to the EWGSOP2 guidelines for the critical cur-off for hand dynamometry, the patients were divided into two groups: those with the hand grip strength 16 kg (n = 41) and those with 16 kg (n = 105).Results: There were significant correlations of PhA with age (r = -0.369; p =0.017), the results of the screening questionnaire β€œVozrast ne pome-kha” (Age is not a hindrance) (r = -0.359; p = 0.023), Barthel index (r = 0.375; p = 0.018), hand dynamometry (r = 0.395; p = 0.014), hand dynamometry index (r = 0.340; p = 0.021), lean body mass (r = 0.414; p = 0.009), musculoskeletal mass (r = 0.819; p 0.001), proportion of musculoskeletal mass (r = 0.796; p 0.001), walking speed (r = 0.670; p 0.001), and the results of the sit-to-stand test (r = -0.541; p 0.001). Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 61 women (41.8%). There were also significant differences in age, hand dynamometry results, hand dynamometry index, walking speed and results of the sit-to-stand test between the two groups depending on their hand grip strength.Conclusion: The use of hand dynamometry, physical activity tests, and bioimpedance phase angle can be used in clinical practice to diagnose sarcopenia.ΠΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π΅ Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π΅ старСния сниТСниС силы ΠΈ Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ скСлСтных ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΡ† ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ привСсти ΠΊ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ смСрти. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ‚ интСрСс Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ использования Π² клиничСской ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ биоимпСдансного Ρ„Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡƒΠ³Π»Π° (Π°Π½Π³Π». phase angle, PhA) Π² качСствС ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°Ρ€ΠΊΠ΅Ρ€Π° саркопСнии.ЦСль - выявлСниС взаимосвязСй Ρ„Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡƒΠ³Π»Π°, опрСдСляСмого ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ биоимпСдансного Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° состава Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π°, с показатСлями тСстов Ρ„ΡƒΠ½ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ активности Ρƒ гСриатричСских ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡ€Π±ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠžΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ‹ 146 ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½ старчСского возраста (ΠΎΡ‚ 75 Π΄ΠΎ 84 Π»Π΅Ρ‚, срСдний возраст 79,44 Β± 2,56 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°). ВсСм ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°ΠΌ рассчитывали индСкс коморбидности Charlson, индСкс Barthel, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ 7-балльного опросника «Возраст Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Β», тСст 5-ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ вставания со стула ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³ΡƒΠ»ΠΎΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ тСст Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΡŒΠ±Ρ‹ Π½Π° расстояниС 4 ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π° ΠΏΠΎ стандартной ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ΅, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ биоимпСдансный Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· состава Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π° (Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ АВБ-02, «МСдасс», Россия). ΠŸΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ силы ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ кистСвой Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ с ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΡŒΡŽ мСханичСского кистСвого Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°. ИндСкс кистСвой Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ рассчитывался Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ силы Ρ…Π²Π°Ρ‚Π° кисти Π½Π° рост ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π²ΠΎ Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΉ стСпСни. Богласно рСкомСндациям EWGSOP2 Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ критичСской Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ для кистСвой Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‹ Π½Π° Π΄Π²Π΅ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹: с силой Ρ…Π²Π°Ρ‚Π° кисти Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 16 ΠΊΠ³ (n = 41) ΠΈ с силой Ρ…Π²Π°Ρ‚Π° кисти ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 16 ΠΊΠ³ (n = 105).Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ВыявлСны статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΡ‹Π΅ коррСляции PhA с возрастом (r = -0,369; p = 0,017), Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ скринингового опросника «Возраст Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Β» (r = -0,359; p = 0,023), индСксом Barthel (r = 0,375; p = 0,018), кистСвой Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ (r = 0,395; p = 0,014), индСксом кистСвой Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ (r = 0,340; p = 0,021), Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ массой Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π° (r = 0,414; p = 0,009), скСлСтно-ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ массой (r = 0,819; p 0,001), Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ скСлСтно-ΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ массы (r = 0,796; p 0,001), ΡΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΡŒΠ±Ρ‹ (r = 0,670; p 0,001), тСстом 5-ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ вставания со стула (r = -0,541; p 0,001). Π”ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ· саркопСнии установлСн Ρƒ 61 (41,8%) ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ сравнСнии Π΄Π²ΡƒΡ… Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏ, сформированных Π² зависимости ΠΎΡ‚ силы Ρ…Π²Π°Ρ‚Π° кисти, статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ возраст, кистСвая динамомСтрия, индСкс кистСвой Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΡŒΠ±Ρ‹, врСмя выполнСния тСста 5-ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ вставания со стула.Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠšΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅Π²Π°Ρ динамомСтрия, тСсты физичСской активности ΠΈ биоимпСдансного Ρ„Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡƒΠ³Π»Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π² клиничСской ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ диагностикС саркопСнии

    Π”Π΅Π±ΡŽΡ‚ гистиоцитоза ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ЛангСрганса Π²ΠΎ взрослом возрастС. ΠšΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ наблюдСниС

    No full text
    Langerhans cell histiocytosis is mainly diagnosed in children, and its manifestation in adult age is quite uncommon. Skin rashes may be non-specific and mimic a number of dermatoses. Therefore, the clinical diagnosis is challenging and as a rule, such patients are misinterpreted and managed for other disorders by a dermatologist for some years. We present a clinical case of Langerhans cell histiocytosis with skin involvement in a 35-year female patient, who had been treated by a dermatologist for 2 years for pyoderma, seborrheic dermatitis, and skin fold candidiasis. Taking into account the clinical signs and symptoms and age of manifestation, we initially suspected familial benign pemphigus (Hailey-Hailey disease) or follicular dyskeratosis (Darier's disease). However, the histological assessment showed Langerhans cell histiocytosis confirmed by immunohistochemistry with anti-langerin, anti-CD1a, and anti-protein S-100 antibodies. The patient was referred to a hematologist for further work-upand specific treatment. In cases of any treatment resistant disorders, which do not respond to long-term conventional treatment, it is necessary to reconsider the diagnosis by means of histological investigation. It would allow for identification of a disease, which is uncommon in dermatology practice.Гистиоцитоз ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ЛангСрганса Π² основном диагностируСтся Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ, Π΅Π³ΠΎ манифСстация Π²ΠΎ взрослом возрастС встрСчаСтся довольно Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ. Высыпания Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ нСспСцифичСский Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ряд Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ·ΠΎΠ². ВслСдствиС этого клиничСская диагностика Π·Π°Ρ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Π°, ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, Π² Ρ‚Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΈΡ… Π»Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΎΡˆΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Ρƒ Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π° с Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠΈ. Π’ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠ΅ приводится наблюдСниС гистиоцитоза ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ЛангСрганса с ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠΈ Ρƒ ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ 35 Π»Π΅Ρ‚, которая 2 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° наблюдалась с Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠΈΠΈ, сСборСйного Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π°, ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ·Π° складок. Учитывая ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ заболСвания ΠΈ возраст Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° заболСвания, Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ΅ сСмСйной доброкачСствСнной ΠΏΡƒΠ·Ρ‹Ρ€Ρ‡Π°Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ Π₯Π΅ΠΉΠ»ΠΈ Π₯Π΅ΠΉΠ»ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ фолликулярного дискСратоза Π”Π°Ρ€ΡŒΠ΅. Однако ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ гистологичСском исслСдовании Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ выявлСны ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΈ гистиоцитоза ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ ЛангСрганса, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡŒ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ иммуногистохимичСского исслСдования с Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΊ Π»Π°Π½Π³Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ, CD1a, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ S-100. Для обслСдования ΠΈ провСдСния спСцифичСской Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ больная Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° Π½Π°ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΊ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Ρƒ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈ рСзистСнтных процСссах, Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… Π΄Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΡ‚Π°Π½Π΄Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π½ΡƒΡŽ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡŽ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ для уточнСния Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ гистологичСскоС исслСдованиС, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π΅ Π²Ρ‹ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΊΠΎ Π²ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Ρ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³Π° заболСвания
    • …
    corecore