269 research outputs found
A Semidefinite Hierarchy for Containment of Spectrahedra
A spectrahedron is the positivity region of a linear matrix pencil and thus
the feasible set of a semidefinite program. We propose and study a hierarchy of
sufficient semidefinite conditions to certify the containment of a
spectrahedron in another one. This approach comes from applying a moment
relaxation to a suitable polynomial optimization formulation. The hierarchical
criterion is stronger than a solitary semidefinite criterion discussed earlier
by Helton, Klep, and McCullough as well as by the authors. Moreover, several
exactness results for the solitary criterion can be brought forward to the
hierarchical approach. The hierarchy also applies to the (equivalent) question
of checking whether a map between matrix (sub-)spaces is positive. In this
context, the solitary criterion checks whether the map is completely positive,
and thus our results provide a hierarchy between positivity and complete
positivity.Comment: 24 pages, 2 figures; minor corrections; to appear in SIAM J. Opti
The matricial relaxation of a linear matrix inequality
Given linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) L_1 and L_2, it is natural to ask:
(Q1) when does one dominate the other, that is, does L_1(X) PsD imply L_2(X)
PsD? (Q2) when do they have the same solution set? Such questions can be
NP-hard. This paper describes a natural relaxation of an LMI, based on
substituting matrices for the variables x_j. With this relaxation, the
domination questions (Q1) and (Q2) have elegant answers, indeed reduce to
constructible semidefinite programs. Assume there is an X such that L_1(X) and
L_2(X) are both PD, and suppose the positivity domain of L_1 is bounded. For
our "matrix variable" relaxation a positive answer to (Q1) is equivalent to the
existence of matrices V_j such that L_2(x)=V_1^* L_1(x) V_1 + ... + V_k^*
L_1(x) V_k. As for (Q2) we show that, up to redundancy, L_1 and L_2 are
unitarily equivalent.
Such algebraic certificates are typically called Positivstellensaetze and the
above are examples of such for linear polynomials. The paper goes on to derive
a cleaner and more powerful Putinar-type Positivstellensatz for polynomials
positive on a bounded set of the form {X | L(X) PsD}.
An observation at the core of the paper is that the relaxed LMI domination
problem is equivalent to a classical problem. Namely, the problem of
determining if a linear map from a subspace of matrices to a matrix algebra is
"completely positive".Comment: v1: 34 pages, v2: 41 pages; supplementary material is available in
the source file, or see http://srag.fmf.uni-lj.si
Matrix Convex Hulls of Free Semialgebraic Sets
This article resides in the realm of the noncommutative (free) analog of real
algebraic geometry - the study of polynomial inequalities and equations over
the real numbers - with a focus on matrix convex sets and their projections
. A free semialgebraic set which is convex as well as bounded and open
can be represented as the solution set of a Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI), a
result which suggests that convex free semialgebraic sets are rare. Further,
Tarski's transfer principle fails in the free setting: The projection of a free
convex semialgebraic set need not be free semialgebraic. Both of these results,
and the importance of convex approximations in the optimization community,
provide impetus and motivation for the study of the free (matrix) convex hull
of free semialgebraic sets.
This article presents the construction of a sequence of LMI domains
in increasingly many variables whose projections are
successively finer outer approximations of the matrix convex hull of a free
semialgebraic set . It is based on free analogs of
moments and Hankel matrices. Such an approximation scheme is possibly the best
that can be done in general. Indeed, natural noncommutative transcriptions of
formulas for certain well known classical (commutative) convex hulls does not
produce the convex hulls in the free case. This failure is illustrated on one
of the simplest free nonconvex .
A basic question is which free sets are the projection of a free
semialgebraic set ? Techniques and results of this paper bear upon this
question which is open even for convex sets.Comment: 41 pages; includes table of contents; supplementary material (a
Mathematica notebook) can be found at
http://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~igorklep/publ.htm
The convex Positivstellensatz in a free algebra
Given a monic linear pencil L in g variables let D_L be its positivity
domain, i.e., the set of all g-tuples X of symmetric matrices of all sizes
making L(X) positive semidefinite. Because L is a monic linear pencil, D_L is
convex with interior, and conversely it is known that convex bounded
noncommutative semialgebraic sets with interior are all of the form D_L. The
main result of this paper establishes a perfect noncommutative
Nichtnegativstellensatz on a convex semialgebraic set. Namely, a noncommutative
polynomial p is positive semidefinite on D_L if and only if it has a weighted
sum of squares representation with optimal degree bounds: p = s^* s + \sum_j
f_j^* L f_j, where s, f_j are vectors of noncommutative polynomials of degree
no greater than 1/2 deg(p). This noncommutative result contrasts sharply with
the commutative setting, where there is no control on the degrees of s, f_j and
assuming only p nonnegative, as opposed to p strictly positive, yields a clean
Positivstellensatz so seldom that such cases are noteworthy.Comment: 22 page
Ground state for a massive scalar field in BTZ spacetime with Robin boundary conditions
We consider a real, massive scalar field in BTZ spacetime, a 2+1-dimensional
black hole solution of the Einstein's field equations with a negative
cosmological constant. First, we analyze the space of classical solutions in a
mode decomposition and we characterize the collection of all admissible
boundary conditions of Robin type which can be imposed at infinity. Secondly,
we investigate whether, for a given boundary condition, there exists a ground
state by constructing explicitly its two-point function. We demonstrate that
for a subclass of the boundary conditions it is possible to construct a ground
state that locally satisfies the Hadamard property. In all other cases, we show
that bound state mode solutions exist and, therefore, such construction is not
possible.Comment: 17 pages, 3 figure
- …