551,922 research outputs found

    Topological restrictions for circle actions and harmonic morphisms

    Full text link
    Let MmM^m be a compact oriented smooth manifold which admits a smooth circle action with isolated fixed points which are isolated as singularities as well. Then all the Pontryagin numbers of MmM^m are zero and its Euler number is nonnegative and even. In particular, MmM^m has signature zero. Since a non-constant harmonic morphism with one-dimensional fibres gives rise to a circle action we have the following applications: (i) many compact manifolds, for example CPnCP^{n}, K3K3 surfaces, S2n×PgS^{2n}\times P_g (n2n\geq2) where PgP_g is the closed surface of genus g2g\geq2 can never be the domain of a non-constant harmonic morphism with one-dimensional fibres whatever metrics we put on them; (ii) let (M4,g)(M^4,g) be a compact orientable four-manifold and ϕ:(M4,g)(N3,h)\phi:(M^4,g)\to(N^3,h) a non-constant harmonic morphism. Suppose that one of the following assertions holds: (1) (M4,g)(M^4,g) is half-conformally flat and its scalar curvature is zero, (2) (M4,g)(M^4,g) is Einstein and half-conformally flat, (3) (M4,g,J)(M^4,g,J) is Hermitian-Einstein. Then, up to homotheties and Riemannian coverings, ϕ\phi is the canonical projection T4T3T^4\to T^3 between flat tori.Comment: 18 pages; Minor corrections to Proposition 3.1 and small changes in Theorem 2.8, proof of Theorem 3.3 and Remark 3.

    Gauge-Fermion Unification and Flavour Symmetry

    Full text link
    After we study the 6-dimensional N=(1,1){\cal N} = (1, 1) supersymmetry breaking and RR symmetry breaking on M4×T2/ZnM^4\times T^2/Z_n, we construct two N=(1,1){\cal N} = (1, 1) supersymmetric E6E_6 models on M4×T2/Z3M^4\times T^2/Z_3 where E6E_6 is broken down to SO(10)×U(1)XSO(10)\times U(1)_X by orbifold projection. In Model I, three families of the Standard Model fermions arise from the zero modes of bulk vector multiplet, and the RR symmetry U(1)FI×SU(2)4U(1)_F^{I} \times SU(2)_{{\bf 4}_-} can be considered as flavour symmetry. This may explain why there are three families of fermions in the nature. In Model II, the first two families come from the zero modes of bulk vector multiplet, and the flavour symmetry is similar. In these models, the anomalies can be cancelled, and we have very good fits to the SM fermion masses and mixings. We also comment on the N=(1,1){\cal N}=(1, 1) supersymmetric E6E_6 models on M4×T2/Z4M^4\times T^2/Z_4 and M4×T2/Z6M^4\times T^2/Z_6, SU(9) models on M4×T2/Z3M^4\times T^2/Z_3, and SU(8) models on T2T^2 orbifolds.Comment: Latex, 33 pages, minor change
    corecore