4 research outputs found
Superiority of one-way and realtime quantum machines and new directions
In automata theory, the quantum computation has been widely examined for
finite state machines, known as quantum finite automata (QFAs), and less
attention has been given to the QFAs augmented with counters or stacks.
Moreover, to our knowledge, there is no result related to QFAs having more than
one input head. In this paper, we focus on such generalizations of QFAs whose
input head(s) operate(s) in one-way or realtime mode and present many
superiority of them to their classical counterparts. Furthermore, we propose
some open problems and conjectures in order to investigate the power of
quantumness better. We also give some new results on classical computation.Comment: A revised edition with some correction
The Power of Centralized PC Systems of Pushdown Automata
Parallel communicating systems of pushdown automata (PCPA) were introduced in
(Csuhaj-Varj{\'u} et. al. 2000) and in their centralized variants shown to be
able to simulate nondeterministic one-way multi-head pushdown automata. A
claimed converse simulation for returning mode (Balan 2009) turned out to be
incomplete (Otto 2012) and a language was suggested for separating these PCPA
of degree two (number of pushdown automata) from nondeterministic one-way
two-head pushdown automata. We show that the suggested language can be accepted
by the latter computational model. We present a different example over a single
letter alphabet indeed ruling out the possibility of a simulation between the
models. The open question about the power of centralized PCPA working in
returning mode is then settled by showing them to be universal. Since the
construction is possible using systems of degree two, this also improves the
previous bound three for generating all recursively enumerable languages.
Finally PCPAs are restricted in such a way that a simulation by multi-head
automata is possible
Exact affine counter automata
Β© F. Blanchet-Sadri & S. Osborne. We introduce an affine generalization of counter automata, and analyze their ability as well as affine finite automata. Our contributions are as follows. We show that there is a language that can be recognized by exact realtime affine counter automata but by neither 1-way deterministic pushdown automata nor realtime deterministic k-counter automata. We also show that a certain promise problem, which is conjectured not to be solved by two-way quantum finite automata in polynomial time, can be solved by Las Vegas affine finite automata. Lastly, we show that how a counter helps for affine finite automata by showing that the language MANYTWINS, which is conjectured not to be recognized by affine, quantum or classical finite state models in polynomial time, can be recognized by affine counter automata with one-sided bounded-error in realtime