29,971,325 research outputs found

    ‘Honour’ abuse: the experience of South Asians who identify as LGBT in North West England.

    Get PDF

    FF-pure homomorphisms, strong FF-regularity, and FF-injectivity

    Full text link
    We discuss Matijevic-Roberts type theorem on strong FF-regularity, FF-purity, and Cohen-Macaulay FF-injective (CMFI for short) property. Related to this problem, we also discuss the base change problem and the openness of loci of these properties. In particular, we define the notion of FF-purity of homomorphisms using Radu-Andre homomorphisms, and prove basic properties of it. We also discuss a strong version of strong FF-regularity (very strong FF-regularity), and compare these two versions of strong FF-regularity. As a result, strong FF-regularity and very strong FF-regularity agree for local rings, FF-finite rings, and essentially finite-type algebras over an excellent local rings. We prove the FF-pure base change of strong FF-regularity.Comment: 37 pages, updated the bibliography, and modified some error

    One-dimensional F-definable sets in F((t))

    Full text link
    We study definable sets in power series fields with perfect residue fields. We show that certain `one-dimensional' definable sets are in fact existentially definable. This allows us to apply results from previous work about existentially definable sets to one-dimensional definable sets. More precisely, let FF be a perfect field and let a be a tuple from F((t))F((t)) of transcendence degree 1 over FF. Using the description of FF-automorphisms of F((t))F((t)) given by Schilling, we show that the orbit of a under FF-automorphisms is existentially definable in the ring language with parameters from F(t)F(t). We deduce the following corollary. Let XX be an FF-definable subset of F((t))F((t)) which is not contained in FF, then the subfield generated by XX is equal to F((tpn))F((t^{p^n})), for some n<ωn<\omega.Comment: 11 page

    F-adjunction

    Full text link
    In this paper we study singularities defined by the action of Frobenius in characteristic p>0p > 0. We prove results analogous to inversion of adjunction along a center of log canonicity. For example, we show that if XX is a Gorenstein normal variety then to every normal center of sharp FF-purity WXW \subseteq X such that XX is FF-pure at the generic point of WW, there exists a canonically defined \bQ-divisor ΔW\Delta_{W} on WW satisfying (K_X)|_W \sim_{\bQ} K_{W} + \Delta_{W}. Furthermore, the singularities of XX near WW are "the same" as the singularities of (W,ΔW)(W, \Delta_{W}). As an application, we show that there are finitely many subschemes of a quasi-projective variety that are compatibly split by a given Frobenius splitting. We also reinterpret Fedder's criterion in this context, which has some surprising implications.Comment: 31 pages; to appear in Algebra and Number Theory. Typos corrected, presentation improved throughout. Section 7 subdivided into two sections (7 and 8). The proofs of 4.8, 5.8 and 9.5 improve

    The fully residually F quotients of F*<x,y>

    Full text link
    We describe the fully residually F; or limit groups relative to F; (where F is a free group) that arise from systems of equations in two variables over F that have coefficients in F.Comment: 64 pages, 2 figures. Following recommendations from a referee, the paper has been completely reorganized and many small mistakes have been corrected. There were also a few gaps in the earlier version of the paper that have been fixed. In particular much of the content of Section 8 in the previous version had to be replaced. This paper is to appear in Groups. Geom. Dy
    corecore