Constrained action selection in children with developmental coordination disorder

The effect of advance (‘precue’) information on short aiming movements was explored in adults, high school children, and primary school children with and without developmental coordination disorder (n = 10, 14, 16, 10, respectively). Reaction times in the DCD group were longer than in the other groups and were more influenced by the extent to which the precue constrained the possible action space. In contrast, reaction time did not alter as a function of precue condition in adults. Children with DCD showed greater inaccuracy of response (despite the increased RT). We suggest that the different precue effects reflect differences in the relative benefits of priming an action prior to definitive information about the movement goal. The benefits are an interacting function of the task and the skill level of the individual. Our experiment shows that children with DCD gain a benefit from advance preparation in simple aiming movements, highlighting their low skill levels. This result suggests that goal-directed RTs may have diagnostic potential within the clinic

Developmental coordination disorder: A discrete disability

Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) have a motor learning disability that reduces their ability to interact with the environment and compromises their social and emotional development. Accordingly, these children should be given the extra assistance and consideration given to children with other learning difficulties. Even though many countries have well developed policies to support students at educational risk, children with movement difficulties are not widely considered to be members of this category. This paper argues for a change in education policy and practice in order to better support children with DCD or Motor Learning Disability (MLD). Improved teacher education practices, community education of professionals and parents and a greater interaction between parents, teachers and therapists will enrich the educational experiences of these children. A first step, however is to acknowledge that DCD is a motor learning disability (MLD) and consider adopting this alternative term. While focussing on the Australian perspective, this paper has implications for education policy and practice in all countries

Executive functioning, motor difficulties and developmental coordination disorder

The current study assessed a comprehensive range of executive functions (EFs) in children with poor motor skills, comparing profiles of children with a diagnosis of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and those identified with motor difficulties (MD). Children in both groups performed more poorly than typically-developing controls on nonverbal measures of working memory, inhibition, planning and fluency, but not on tests of switching. The similar patterns of strengths and weaknesses in children with MD and DCD have important implications for parents, teachers and clinicians, as children with MD may struggle with EF tasks even though their motor difficulties are not identified

Exploring joint hypermobility syndrome, developmental coordination disorder and pain

INTRODUCTION Floppy, clumsy, hypermobile children are increasingly referred to occupational and physical therapy under the label of dyspraxia. Motor impairments associated with the umbrella diagnosis of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) have been reported as persisting into adolescence and adulthood and subsequently affecting functional abilities (Cousins and Smyth 2003). Within this heterogeneous condition the underlying mechanisms causing the motor difficulties remains unclear. Ayers (1985) hypothesised that some individuals might have somatosensory processing issues contributing to their poor motor planning and coordination difficulties. Similarities in functional difficulties have been noted in children with a diagnosis of DCD and joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) (Kirby and Davies 2006). There is limited understanding of the relationship between the two conditions. JHS is a multisystemic inherited connective tissue disorder, in which hypermobile joints, pain, clumsiness, poor proprioception and dislocations are familiar features (Grahame and Hakim 2006; Adib et al 2005). It has been suggested that adults with JHS show poor movement patterns which contribute to biomechanical dysfunction and continuing pain (Clark et al 2009). Pain and disability reported in adults with JHS often leads to anxiety, depression, work incapacity and social isolation (Grahame and Hakim 2006). The purpose of this study was to explore the association between adults with JHS and DCD and long term pain. METHODOLOGY/ METHODS A mixed methods design influenced by a pragmatic paradigm was utilised. Subjects: 90 patients with JHS (18-65 years) recruited from a hypermobility clinic were compared, using a questionnaire, with 113 healthy volunteers (18-65 years) with no pain recruited from a university. Analysis: Quantitative data were described and examined by regression, odds ratios were calculated. Qualitative data was analysed thematically FINDINGS The percentage of subjects who reported DCD in patients with JHS and healthy volunteers were 56% and 19% respectively. A significant association between patients with JHS and DCD was noted, chi square = 30.11, p < .001. Patients with JHS were 6 times [95% CI 2.9 – 10.3] more likely to report DCD than healthy volunteers. Pain was a significant feature with an average of 9.8 pain sites reported (out of a total of 17). Open ended questions revealed many patients recalling pain starting in early childhood and adolescence. DISCUSSION These results suggest a significant association between patients with JHS and DCD and the reporting of long term pain. Early recognition and understanding of the needs of children with DCD who present with somatosensory impairment, pain modulation and JHS is therefore essential. Sensory integration therapy as part of a comprehensive early intervention program has the potential to mitigate long term problems. A multidisciplinary approach which involves health professionals and teachers is also recommended. CONCLUSION This research may be considered an early step in the identification of an association of DCD and JHS. Further studies are required to explore somatosensory processing issues experienced by those with DCD and JHS as this might be an important underlying mechanism

Developmental motor profile in preschool children with primary stereotypic movement disorder

Aim. Different neuropsychological dysfunctions have been described in children with primary Stereotypic Movement Disorder (SMD), mainly attention or motor coordination problems. Up to now with no study has evaluated psychomotor functions in preschoolers primary SMD. The aim of this observational study was to gather information on the motor profiles of SMD patients in this age range in comparison with typically developing children. Patients and Methods. Twenty-six children (four girls) aged 36 to 76 months (mean= 53 ±10) with primary SMD were assessed by a structured evaluation including the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), the Beery-Buktenica Developmental test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), the Repetitive Behaviour Scale-Revised (RBS-R), the Motor Severity Stereotypy Scale (MSSS), and the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL). The diagnoses of Intellectual Disability or Autism Spectrum Disorder were exclusion criteria from the study. A comparison group of twenty-seven (four girls) typically developing children without stereotypies aged 36 to 59 months (mean= 48 ±7) was also examined. Results. The MABC-2 total score was lower than 15th percentile in fifteen children with SMD (58%); the worst performances were observed in Balance and Manual Dexterity subtests. The motor coordination score of VMI was lower than 15th percentile in ten children (38%). The majority of the children with low scores at MABC-2 also had low scores at the motor coordination subscale of VMI. MABC-2 standard scores of the clinical group were significantly lower than those of controls on MABC-2 Total, Balance, and Ball Skills subtests. Conclusion. The finding of widespread dysfunction of gross and fine motor abilities in preschoolers with primary SMD seems to delineate a peculiar phenotype and could provide new approaches to the management of this neurodevelopment disorder

Association Between Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Developmental Coordination Disorder – A Review.

Introduction: The term joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS) was adopted after clinicians became aware of the myriad of symptoms associated with this multisystemic condition. JHS is an inherited disorder of connective tissues affecting the musculoskeletal and visceral systems which may contribute to a reduction in health related physical fitness. Pain associated with JHS may be influenced by hypermobility and biomechanical dysfunction. Biomechanical dysfunction observed in patients with JHS may be as a result of impaired motor control and in particular developmental coordination disorder (DCD). DCD (described in the literature utilising the terms clumsy child syndrome; perceptual motor dysfunction; dyspraxia) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by coordination difficulties affecting function. The objective of this review is to examine the association between hypermobility, JHS, motor control impairment and DCD. Methods and data sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ASSIA, PsychARTICLES, SPORTDiscus and PsycINFO from 1989 - 2009. Research articles written in English and peer reviewed were included. Results: Five research papers were identified. The studies employed a variety of methodologies and assessment tools for reporting joint hypermobility, JHS, motor delay, motor impairments and DCD. All five studies reported on children between the ages of six months and 12 years. Three out of four studies reported on association between impaired motor development, motor delay and joint hypermobility. There was no consensus as to whether motor delay, impaired motor development and joint hypermobility continued as the child matured. One study ascertained that children with JHS reported similar functional difficulties as children with DCD. Conclusion: There was a paucity of literature relating to an association between joint hypermobility, JHS, impaired motor control, motor delay and DCD in children, there was no literature pertaining to adults. This association requires further exploration if professionals are to understand, nurture and manage those reporting these associated conditions