Two-boxing is irrational

Philosophers debate whether one-boxing or two-boxing is the rational act in a Newcomb situation. I shall argue that one-boxing is the only rational choice. This is so because there is no intelligible aim by reference to which you can justify the choice of two-boxing over one-boxing once you have come to think that you will two-box (whereas there is such an aim by reference to which you can justify one-boxing). The only aim by which the agent in the Newcomb situation can justify his two-boxing is the subjunctively described aim of ‘getting more than I would if I were to one-box’. But such a subjunctively described aim can justify an action only if it can be seen as generating, in conjunction with the agent’s beliefs, an indicatively describable aim which justifies the action. In the case of the Newcomb agent the aim of 'getting more than I would if I were to one-box’ cannot be seen in this way

Optimal sorting of product into fixed weight packaging

Compac Sorting Equipment make very nifty machines for sorting fruit by weight, diameter, colour, density, blemish or even shape. Compac sought solutions to two closely related problems: the boxing problem and the bagging problem. The boxing problem requires graded fruit to be assigned to outlets where boxes are filled with a specified number of fruit to a minimum weight (and a specified tolerance for underweights). The aim is to maximise the number of boxes packed. The decision must be made after all information is known, but before the fruit passes the first outlet - a few seconds total. Further, information about fruit already packed in a given box is incomplete (we don’t know exactly which fruit ended up in a box). The bagging problem requires bags to be filled to a minimum weight - no tolerance for underweights, and no constraints on the number of fruit per bag. In this case complete information is available on fruit already assigned to a bag. Again the aim is to maximise the number of bags packed

Equality - Focus on Sport, Football and Inclusivity

This edition contains features on: • LimbPower – new status as a National Disability Sports Organisation • Football and inclusivity - Dr Dan Parnell • Games Starters volunteering opportunity at the Cerebral Palsy International Sports and Recreation Association’s World Games in 2015 • Sporting Equals - Boxing in Mosques • A selection of recent information • A brief look at some local work • Calendar of forthcoming event

BOXING CLEVER: What boxing can tell us about our culture & society

Often surrounded by controversy, boxing has continued to reflect cultural and social values to the present day, with schisms emerging within the Amateur Boxing Association of England and Head Coach Terry Edwards during the Beijing 2008 Games, and with women’s boxing being announced as the newest sport to gain Olympic recognition in the 2012 London Games

A note on the fractional perimeter and interpolation

We present the fractional perimeter as a set-function interpolation between the Lebesgue measure and the perimeter in the sense of De Giorgi. Our motivation comes from a new fractional Boxing inequality that relates the fractional perimeter and the Hausdorff content and implies several known inequalities involving the Gagliardo seminorm of the Sobolev spaces $W^{\alpha, 1}$ of order $0 < \alpha < 1$

Accuracy and repeatability of wrist joint angles in boxing using an electromagnetic tracking system

© 2019, The Author(s). The hand-wrist region is reported as the most common injury site in boxing. Boxers are at risk due to the amount of wrist motions when impacting training equipment or their opponents, yet we know relatively little about these motions. This paper describes a new method for quantifying wrist motion in boxing using an electromagnetic tracking system. Surrogate testing procedure utilising a polyamide hand and forearm shape, and in vivo testing procedure utilising 29 elite boxers, were used to assess the accuracy and repeatability of the system. 2D kinematic analysis was used to calculate wrist angles using photogrammetry, whilst the data from the electromagnetic tracking system was processed with visual 3D software. The electromagnetic tracking system agreed with the video-based system (paired t tests) in both the surrogate ( 0.9). In the punch testing, for both repeated jab and hook shots, the electromagnetic tracking system showed good reliability (ICCs > 0.8) and substantial reliability (ICCs > 0.6) for flexion–extension and radial-ulnar deviation angles, respectively. The results indicate that wrist kinematics during punching activities can be measured using an electromagnetic tracking system