8 research outputs found

    Shape vs. word task using trials in which stimuli were identified as optical illusions in the shape task or as words in the word task.

    Full text link
    <p>Note: R. = right, L. = left, BA = Brodmann area, dm = dorsomedial nucleus, vl = ventral lateral nucleus, p = pulvinar.</p><p>Shape vs. word task using trials in which stimuli were identified as optical illusions in the shape task or as words in the word task.</p

    Shape task vs. baseline.

    Full text link
    <p>a: shape > baseline (identified as optical illusions: <i>p</i> < 0.05, family-wise error [FWE] corrected), b: shape > baseline (not identified as optical illusions: <i>p</i> < 0.05, FWE-corrected). IFG = inferior frontal gyrus, MFG = middle frontal gyrus, Th = thalamus, MOG = middle occipital gyrus.</p

    The stimuli in the present experiment were illusory figures generated from many kana letters, which are Japanese phonograms.

    Full text link
    <p>For example: (a) Müller-Lyer illusion with the Japanese phonogram “e,” (b) Jastrow illusion with the Japanese phonogram “to,” (c) Müller-Lyer illusion with the Japanese phonogram “hi,” and (d) Delboeuf illusion with the Japanese phonogram “hu.” Representation of the examples of a trial time course (e). Each stimulus appeared for 4 s, with an interstimulus interval of 9 s.</p

    Trials in which stimuli were not identified as optical illusions compared to baseline.

    Full text link
    <p>Note: R. = right, L. = left, BA = Brodmann area.</p><p>Trials in which stimuli were not identified as optical illusions compared to baseline.</p

    Trials in which stimuli were identified as optical illusions in the shape task compared to baseline.

    Full text link
    <p>Note: R. = right, L. = left, BA = Brodmann area, dm = dorsomedial nucleus, vl = ventral lateral nucleus, p = pulvinar.</p><p>Trials in which stimuli were identified as optical illusions in the shape task compared to baseline.</p

    The four analyzed models having different matrix A structures (a).

    Full text link
    <p>For details, see the “<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0128750#sec002" target="_blank">Materials and Methods</a>” section. Results of Bayesian model selection of the random effects design on the model levels. Model expected probability (b) and model exceedance probability (c). p = pulvinar.</p
    corecore