Lymphovascular invasion quantification could improve risk prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To quantify lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and to assess the prognostic value in patients with pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In this nationwide, retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they were treated with surgery or endoscopic resection for pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Primary endpoint was the presence of metastases, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases, in surgical resection specimens or during follow‐up. A prediction model to identify risk factors for metastases was developed and internally validated. RESULTS: 248 patients were included. LVI was distributed as follows: no LVI (n = 196; 79.0%), 1 LVI focus (n = 16; 6.5%), 2–3 LVI foci (n = 21; 8.5%) and ≥4 LVI foci (n = 15; 6.0%). Seventy‐eight patients had metastases. The risk of metastases was increased for tumors with 2–3 LVI foci [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 3.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10–5.47] and ≥4 LVI foci (SHR 3.81, 95% CI 2.37–6.10). The prediction model demonstrated a good discriminative ability (c‐statistic 0.81). CONCLUSION: The risk of metastases is higher when more LVI foci are present. Quantification of LVI could be useful for a more precise risk estimation of metastases. This model needs to be externally validated before implementation into clinical practice

Colorectal liver metastases: Surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) - a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are widely accepted techniques to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although previous studies labelled thermal ablation inferior to surgical resection, the apparent selection bias when comparing patients with unresectable disease to surgical candidates, the superior safety profile, and the competitive overall survival results for the more recent reports mandate the setup of a randomized controlled trial. The objective of the COLLISION trial is to prove non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared to hepatic resection in patients with at least one resectable and ablatable CRLM and no extrahepatic disease. Methods: In this two-arm, single-blind multi-center phase-III clinical trial, six hundred and eighteen patients with at least one CRLM (≤3cm) will be included to undergo either surgical resection or thermal ablation of appointed target lesion(s) (≤3cm). Primary endpoint is OS (overall survival, intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall disease-free survival (DFS), time to progression (TTP), time to local progression (TTLP), primary and assisted technique efficacy (PTE, ATE), procedural morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, assessment of pain and quality of life (QoL), cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Discussion: If thermal ablation proves to be non-inferior in treating lesions ≤3cm, a switch in treatment-method may lead to a reduction of the post-procedural morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay and incremental costs without compromising oncological outcome for patients with CRLM. Trial registration:NCT03088150 , January 11th 2017

EcoHealth-OneHealth Resource Centre, Chiang Mai University

Background and purpose: To assess intra- and inter-fraction motion uncertainties, due to displacements of the tumor bed (TB) and organs at risk (OAR), as well as intra- and inter-fraction patient set-up uncertainties, due to positioning variations, during image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in children with Wilms’ tumor. Material and methods: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) and daily pre- and post-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT)-scans of 15 patients (average 4, range 1–8 years) undergoing flank irradiation after nephrectomy were analyzed. TB (marked by four surgical clips) and OAR motion uncertainties were quantified by displacements of the center of mass in all orthogonal directions. Translational and rotational bone off-sets were recorded for patient set-up uncertainties assessment in all orthogonal directions. The average results, systematic and random errors were computed. Results: Average intra- and inter-fraction motion uncertainties were ≤1.1 mm (range: [−6.9;7.9] mm) for the TB and ≤3.2 mm (range: [−9.1;9.6] mm) for the OAR. Average intra- and inter-fraction patient set-up uncertainties were ≤0.1 mm (range: [−3.3;4.8] mm) and ≤0.9° (range: [0.0;2.8°]). Both motion and patient set-up uncertainties were larger for the cranio-caudal direction. Calculated systematic and random errors were ≤2.4 mm for the motion uncertainties and ≤0.8 mm/0.7° for the patient set-up uncertainties. Conclusions: Average motion and patient set-up uncertainties during radiotherapy treatment were found to be limited. However, uncertainties were larger for the cranio-caudal direction and outliers were found in all orthogonal directions. When having available 4D-CT and CBCT information, the use of patient-specific and anisotropic safety margin expansions is advised for both target volume and OAR

Intra- and inter-fraction uncertainties during IGRT for Wilms’ tumor

Background and purpose: To assess intra- and inter-fraction motion uncertainties, due to displacements of the tumor bed (TB) and organs at risk (OAR), as well as intra- and inter-fraction patient set-up uncertainties, due to positioning variations, during image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in children with Wilms’ tumor. Material and methods: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) and daily pre- and post-treatment cone-beam CT (CBCT)-scans of 15 patients (average 4, range 1–8 years) undergoing flank irradiation after nephrectomy were analyzed. TB (marked by four surgical clips) and OAR motion uncertainties were quantified by displacements of the center of mass in all orthogonal directions. Translational and rotational bone off-sets were recorded for patient set-up uncertainties assessment in all orthogonal directions. The average results, systematic and random errors were computed. Results: Average intra- and inter-fraction motion uncertainties were ≤1.1 mm (range: [−6.9;7.9] mm) for the TB and ≤3.2 mm (range: [−9.1;9.6] mm) for the OAR. Average intra- and inter-fraction patient set-up uncertainties were ≤0.1 mm (range: [−3.3;4.8] mm) and ≤0.9° (range: [0.0;2.8°]). Both motion and patient set-up uncertainties were larger for the cranio-caudal direction. Calculated systematic and random errors were ≤2.4 mm for the motion uncertainties and ≤0.8 mm/0.7° for the patient set-up uncertainties. Conclusions: Average motion and patient set-up uncertainties during radiotherapy treatment were found to be limited. However, uncertainties were larger for the cranio-caudal direction and outliers were found in all orthogonal directions. When having available 4D-CT and CBCT information, the use of patient-specific and anisotropic safety margin expansions is advised for both target volume and OAR

Apparent diffusion coefficient as it relates to histopathology findings in post-chemotherapy nephroblastoma : a feasibility study

Background: Nephroblastomas represent a group of heterogeneous tumours with variable proportions of distinct histopathological components. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether direct comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements with post-resection histopathology subtypes is feasible and whether ADC metrics are related to histopathological components. Materials and methods: Twenty-three children were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. All children had MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) after preoperative chemotherapy, just before tumour resection. A pathologist and radiologist identified corresponding slices at MRI and postoperative specimens using tumour morphology, the upper/lower calyx and hilar vessels as reference points. An experienced reader performed ADC measurements, excluding non-enhancing areas. A pathologist reviewed the corresponding postoperative slides according to the international standard guidelines. We tested potential associations with the Spearman rank test. Results: Side-by-side comparison of MRI–DWI with corresponding histopathology slides was feasible in 15 transverse slices in 9 lesions in 8 patients. Most exclusions were related to extensive areas of necrosis/haemorrhage. In one lesion correlation was not possible because of the different orientation of sectioning of the specimen and MRI slices. The 25% ADC showed a strong relationship with percentage of blastema (Spearman rho=−0.71, P=0.003), whereas median ADC was strongly related to the percentage stroma (Spearman rho=0.74, P=0.002) at histopathology. Conclusion: Side-by-side comparison of MRI–DWI and histopathology is feasible in the majority of patients who do not have massive necrosis and hemorrhage. Blastemal and stromal components have a strong linear relationship with ADC markers

Flaming Gorge Suspension Bridge Construction

Bridge crew speeds work to complete the structure by Friday, May 22, 1959. The cable is assembled in seven cable sections for extra strength. The bridge will cut in half the previous distance and make it just 47 miles from Vernal to Dutch John, Utah

Below-elbow cast for metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children:A randomised multicentre study

Introduction: Minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children are often treated with an above-elbow cast (AEC). Treatment with a below-elbow cast (BEC) could give more comfort, but might lead to fracture displacement reducing pronation and supination. Because this has not been systematically investigated, we set up a randomised multicentre study. The purpose of this study was to find out whether BEC causes equal limitation of pronation and supination but with higher comfort level, compared with AEC. Patients and methods: In four hospitals, consecutive children aged &lt; 16 (mean 7.1) years with a minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fracture of the distal forearm were randomised to 4 weeks BEC (n = 35) or 4 weeks AEC (n = 31). Primary outcome was limitation of pronation and supination 6 months after initial trauma. The secondary outcomes were cast comfort, limitation of flexion/extension of wrist/elbow, complications, cosmetics, complaints, and radiological assessment. Results: A group of 35 children received BEC and 31 children received AEC. All children attended for the final examination at a mean follow-up of 7.0 months (range 5.0-11.6 months). Limitation of pronation and supination 6 months after initial trauma showed no significant difference between the two groups [4.4°(±5.8) for BEC and 5.8°(±9.8) for AEC]. Children treated with BEC had significantly higher cast comfort on a visual analogue scale [5.6 (±2.7) vs. 8.4 (±1.4)] and needed significantly less help with dressing (8.2 days vs. 15.1 days). Six complications occurred in the BEC group and 14 in the AEC group. Other secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Children with minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm should be treated with a below-elbow cast.</p

Below-elbow cast for metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children:A randomised multicentre study

Introduction: Minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm in children are often treated with an above-elbow cast (AEC). Treatment with a below-elbow cast (BEC) could give more comfort, but might lead to fracture displacement reducing pronation and supination. Because this has not been systematically investigated, we set up a randomised multicentre study. The purpose of this study was to find out whether BEC causes equal limitation of pronation and supination but with higher comfort level, compared with AEC. Patients and methods: In four hospitals, consecutive children aged &lt; 16 (mean 7.1) years with a minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fracture of the distal forearm were randomised to 4 weeks BEC (n = 35) or 4 weeks AEC (n = 31). Primary outcome was limitation of pronation and supination 6 months after initial trauma. The secondary outcomes were cast comfort, limitation of flexion/extension of wrist/elbow, complications, cosmetics, complaints, and radiological assessment. Results: A group of 35 children received BEC and 31 children received AEC. All children attended for the final examination at a mean follow-up of 7.0 months (range 5.0-11.6 months). Limitation of pronation and supination 6 months after initial trauma showed no significant difference between the two groups [4.4°(±5.8) for BEC and 5.8°(±9.8) for AEC]. Children treated with BEC had significantly higher cast comfort on a visual analogue scale [5.6 (±2.7) vs. 8.4 (±1.4)] and needed significantly less help with dressing (8.2 days vs. 15.1 days). Six complications occurred in the BEC group and 14 in the AEC group. Other secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Children with minimally displaced metaphyseal both-bone fractures of the distal forearm should be treated with a below-elbow cast.</p