Asymptomatic lipofibroadenoma in a 17-year-old male:a case report and literature review of a rare entity

Background: The most common thymic tumours, thymomas, are derived from thymic epithelium and are generally low-grade neoplasm. Frankly malignant tumours, thymic carcinomas are rarer still. Exceedingly rare thymic tumours contain a mesenchymal tissue component such as fibrous connective tissue and/or mature fat. Lipofibroadenoma (LFA) is a very rare mixed epithelial-mesenchymal thymic tumour, included in the category of thymic epithelial tumors. LFA in addition to a mature adipocytic component, contains variable epithelial and mesenchymal tissue components. Owing to the presence of an epithelial component in LFA, this entity, in contrast to thymolipoma, is included in the World Health Organization (WHO) category of thymic epithelial neoplasm. Currently only 12 LFA cases have been described. The 12 previously reported cases all behaved in a benign fashion, although four cases were associated with a conventional type of thymoma. We here present a new, 13th, case of LFA. Case Description: The LFA was discovered incidentally in a previously healthy 17-year-old male after investigations for suspected pneumonia. On imaging a mass was discovered in the anterior mediastinum which was subsequently surgically removed. The resected tumour was extensively investigated, including the first instance of full molecular analysis of this rare entity and all available literature on LFA was sourced to provide a comprehensive overview. The histology of this LFA was similar to previously described cases. No gene mutations or rearrangements were identified. The patient made an uneventful recovery and after 13 months of follow-up remained well. Conclusions: An additional, 13th case of LFA is presented. Based on the available literature it appears that LFA may be considered a benign composite thymic tumour, although the combination of an additional conventional thymoma component may warrant closer follow-up.</p

Small cell osteosarcoma versus fusion-driven round cell sarcomas of bone: retrospective clinical, radiological, pathological, and (epi)genetic comparison with clinical implications

Small cell osteosarcoma (SCOS), a variant of conventional high-grade osteosarcoma (COS), may mimic fusion-driven round cell sarcomas (FDRCS) by overlapping clinico-radiological and histomorphological/immunohistochemical characteristics, hampering accurate diagnosis and consequently proper therapy. We retrospectively analyzed decalcified formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 18 bone tumors primarily diagnosed as SCOS by methylation profiling, fusion gene analysis, and immunohistochemistry. In eight cases, the diagnosis of SCOS was maintained, and in 10 cases it was changed into FDRCS, including three Ewing sarcomas (EWSR1::FLI1 in two cases and no identified fusion gene in the third case), two sarcomas with BCOR alterations (KMT2D::BCOR, CCNB3::BCOR, respectively), three mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (HEY1::NCOA2 in two cases and one case with insufficient RNA quality), and two sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas (FUS::CREBL3 and EWSR1 rearrangement, respectively). Histologically, SCOS usually possessed more pleomorphic cells in contrast to the FDRCS showing mainly monomorphic cellular features. However, osteoid was seen in the latter tumors as well, often associated with slight pleomorphism. Also, the immunohistochemical profile (CD99, SATB2, and BCOR) overlapped. Clinically and radiologically, similarities between SCOS and FDRCS were observed, with by imaging only minimal presence or lack of (mineralized) osteoid in most of the SCOSs. In conclusion, discrimination of SCOS, epigenetically related to COS, versus FDRCS of bone can be challenging but is important due to different biology and therefore therapeutic strategies. Methylation profiling is a reliable and robust diagnostic test especially on decalcified FFPE material. Subsequent fusion gene analysis and/or use of specific immunohistochemical surrogate markers can be used to substantiate the diagnosis

The survival disparity between children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands did not change since the 1990s despite improved survival: A population-based study

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ewing sarcoma have a worse prognosis than children. Population-based survival evaluations stratifying findings by important clinical factors are, however, limited. This Dutch population study comprehensively compared survival of children and AYAs with Ewing sarcoma over three decades considering diagnostic period, tissue of origin, tumor site, and disease stage. Methods: Data on all children (0–17 years, N = 463) and AYAs (18–39 years, N = 379) diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands between 1990–2018 were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until February 2023. Five-year relative survival was calculated using the cohort method. Multivariable analyses were conducted through Poisson regression. Results: Children with Ewing sarcoma had a significantly higher 5-year relative survival than AYAs (65 % vs. 44 %). An increasing trend in survival was noted reaching 70 % in children and 53 % in AYAs in 2010–2018. Results were similar for Ewing bone sarcoma and extraosseous Ewing sarcoma. AYAs had a poorer prognosis than children for most tumor sites and regardless of disease stage. Survival probabilities were 60 % vs. 78 % for localized disease and 20 % vs. 33 % for metastatic disease. Multivariable-regression analysis, adjusted for follow-up time, diagnostic period, sex, disease stage, and tumor site, confirmed increased excess mortality among AYAs compared with children (excess HR: 1.7, 95 % CI: 1.3–2.1). Conclusions: Despite survival improvements since the 1990s, AYAs with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands continue to fare considerably worse than children

Quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI response assessment in rhabdomyosarcoma: an international retrospective study on behalf of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group Imaging Committee

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as a predictive imaging marker after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. Material and methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study group III/IV, treated according to the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 or MTS2008 studies. DW-MRI was performed according to institutional protocols. We performed two-dimensional single-slice tumor delineation. Areas of necrosis or hemorrhage were delineated to be excluded in the primary analysis. Mean, median and 5th and 95th apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were extracted. Results: Of 134 included patients, 82 had measurable tumor at diagnosis and response and DW-MRI scans of adequate quality and were included in the analysis. Technical heterogeneity in scan acquisition protocols and scanners was observed. Mean ADC at diagnosis was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–1.2) (all ADC expressed in * 10−3 mm2/s), versus 1.6 (1.5–1.6) at response assessment. The 5th percentile ADC was 0.8 (0.7–0.9) at diagnosis and 1.1 (1.0–1.2) at response. Absolute change in mean ADC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 0.4 (0.3–0.5). Exploratory analyses for association between ADC and clinical parameters showed a significant difference in mean ADC at diagnosis for alveolar versus embryonal histology. Landmark analysis at nine weeks after the date of diagnosis showed no significant association (hazard ratio 1.3 [0.6–3.2]) between the mean ADC change and event-free survival. Conclusion: A significant change in the 5th percentile and the mean ADC after chemotherapy was observed. Strong heterogeneity was identified in DW-MRI acquisition protocols between centers and in individual patients. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.

INternational Soft Tissue saRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT) consensus statement: Imaging recommendations for the management of rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common soft-tissue neoplasm in the pediatric population. The survival of children with rhabdomyosarcoma has only marginally improved over the past 25 years and remains poor for those with metastatic disease. A significant challenge to advances in treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma is the relative rarity of this disease, necessitating years to complete clinical trials. Progress can be accelerated by international cooperation and sharing national experiences. This necessitates agreement on a common language to describe patient cohorts and consensus standards to guide diagnosis, treatment, and response assessment. These goals formed the premise for creating the INternational Soft Tissue saRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT) in 2017. Multidisciplinary members of this consortium have since developed international consensus statements on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pediatric soft-tissue sarcomas. Herein, members of the INSTRuCT Diagnostic Imaging Working Group present international consensus recommendations for imaging of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma at diagnosis, at staging, and during and after completion of therapy. The intent is to promote a standardized imaging approach to pediatric patients with this malignancy to create more-reliable comparisons of results of clinical trials internationally, thereby accelerating progress in managing rhabdomyosarcoma and improving survival

Corrigendum to “INternational Soft Tissue saRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT) consensus statement: Imaging recommendations for the management of rhabdomyosarcoma” [Eur. J. Radiol. 166 (2023) 111012]

Imaging recommendations for the management of rhabdomyosarcoma” [Eur. J. Radiol. 166 (2023) 111012] (European Journal of Radiology (2023) 166, (S0720048X23003261), (10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111012)

Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults : European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology-Guidelines 2023\u2014overview, and primary local imaging: how and where?

Abstract: ObjectivesEarly, accurate diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. To this end, standardization of imaging algorithms, technical requirements, and reporting is therefore a prerequisite. Since the first European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus in 2015, technical achievements, further insights into specific entities, and the revised WHO-classification (2020) and AJCC staging system (2017) made an update necessary. The guidelines are intended to support radiologists in their decision-making and contribute to interdisciplinary tumor board discussions.Materials and methodsA validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements were scored online by level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds. Either "group consensus," "group agreement," or "lack of agreement" was achieved.ResultsEight sections were defined that finally contained 145 statements with comments. Overall, group consensus was reached in 95.9%, and group agreement in 4.1%. This communication contains the first part consisting of the imaging algorithm for suspected soft tissue tumors, methods for local imaging, and the role of tumor centers.ConclusionUltrasound represents the initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small tumors. MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of most soft tissue tumors. CT is indicated in special situations. In suspicious or likely malignant tumors, a specialist tumor center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion. This should be done before performing a biopsy, without exception.Clinical relevanceThe updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging, to support radiologists in their decision-making, and to improve examination comparability both in individual patients and in future studies on individualized strategies.Key Points center dot Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors.center dot MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy.center dot In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.Key Points center dot Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors.center dot MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy.center dot In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy.Key Points center dot Ultrasound remains the best initial triage imaging modality for accessible and small suspected soft tissue tumors.center dot MRI is the modality of choice for the characterization and local staging of soft tissue tumors in most cases; CT is indicated in special situations. Suspicious or likely malignant tumors should undergo biopsy. center dot In patients with large, indeterminate or suspicious tumors, a tumor reference center should be contacted for referral or teleradiologic second opinion; this must be done before a biopsy