10 research outputs found

    Nasal Bone Fractures: Differences Amongst Sub-Specialty Consultants

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Nasal fractures constitute the largest proportion of facial trauma each year, however, there is no consensus management. In this study, we investingated the role of the consultant and the functional and aesthetic outcomes of procedures performed to address nasal bone fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained nasal bone fractures was conducted from 8/1/14 through 1/23/18. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-squared testing and Fisher\u27s exact test, where appropriate, while continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U testing. RESULTS: During the study period, 136 patients met inclusion criteria for full analysis. The mean age of this cohort was 47.6 ± 20.2 years with the majority identifying as African-American (53.7%) and male (67.2%). Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to assess pre-operative nasal obstruction (100%) compared to plastic surgeons (24.1%) ( CONCLUSIONS: Consultants across subspecialties differ in the management of nasal bone trauma. A more standardized approach is warranted by all individuals involved in the care of maxillofacial trauma patients

    BCOR-Rearranged Sarcoma of the Tonsil.

    Get PDF
    A tonsillar mass in a young patient with no medical issues routinely presents as an infectious process. Practitioners must maintain a broad differential if diagnostic testing does not support an infection. Neoplasm must be excluded. Otolaryngologists must consider malignancies other than squamous cell carcinoma, the most common oropharyngeal malignancy, and lymphoma. Rare tumors, such as sarcomas, must also be considered. Otolaryngologists must be familiar with the proper management of rare oropharyngeal malignancies

    Marginal-zone B-cell lymphoma of the bony palate presenting as sinusitis.

    Full text link
    The diagnosis of low-grade B-cell lymphoma consistent with marginal-zone lymphoma has proven to be challenging when the disease involves the hard palate. The diagnosis is complicated by the nonspecific nature of the presenting symptoms and a difficult-to-differentiate histologic picture. We describe a case of low-grade B-cell lymphoma of the hard palate with a delayed presentation. We also compare the features of this case with the features of the small number of other such cases that have been reported in the literature. Finally, we review the etiology of low-grade B-cell lymphoma, we discuss its radiologic and pathologic features, and we briefly describe the treatment options

    Substance Use and Maxillofacial Trauma: A Comprehensive Patient Profile

    Full text link
    PURPOSE: Maxillofacial trauma confers an increased risk of long-term clinical sequelae with a substantial economic burden on the health care system. Substance use has long been correlated with an increased risk of trauma, yet to date, a comprehensive profile of substance users incurring facial fractures has not been established. We aimed to establish patterns and trends of substance use and specific substances in the setting of maxillofacial trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at our institution examining patients with maxillofacial fractures from 2016 to 2017. Information on age, gender, race, urine drug screen status, setting of presentation, mechanism of injury, trauma history, and injury severity was collected and examined for associations with particular substances. RESULTS: We included 388 patients for analysis. Patients with positive urine drug screen results were significantly more likely to be men, present in an urban setting, incur poly-facial trauma, and have a history of facial trauma. In addition, alcohol use correlated significantly with injury severity in the context of polytrauma. Living in an urban setting and using phencyclidine were both significantly associated with a history of maxillofacial trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with comorbid maxillofacial trauma and substance use exhibit particular patterns in presentation and history. Establishing a profile for these patients allows for the development of prevention and rehabilitation programs

    An Update on Maxillary Fractures: A Heterogenous Group

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the different types of maxillary fractures and highlight their diagnostic and therapeutic differences. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained maxillary fractures was conducted through the Einstein Healthcare Network during the years 2016-2017. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to categorize continuous and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: The cohort of patients (n = 141) were predominately African American (62%) and male (75%) with a mean age 45.3 years. The most common maxillary fracture was maxillary sinus (29%), followed by zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) (26%), frontal process (20%), dentoalveolar (16%), and LeFort (9%). Dentoalveolar fractures were mostly evaluated by the oral maxillofacial surgery service (74%), while ZMC and LeFort fractures were more commonly referred to an otolaryngologist (56% and 67%, respectively). Patients with dentoalveolar fractures were more likely to undergo wire splinting (61%). All patients with frontal process and maxillary sinus fractures were managed non-operatively. Most patients with ZMC fractures were managed non-operatively (78%) while the remainder underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (22%). Patients with LeFort fractures more commonly underwent maxillomandibular fixation (MMF)/ORIF (83%). Dentoalveolar fractures were the most likely to be operated on the same day (93%) while ZMC and LeFort fractures were repaired within 1 week (88% and 100%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Maxillary trauma is very heterogenous in comparison to other maxillofacial trauma patterns. Each fracture type is treated uniquely and can involve one or more provider teams depending on the extent and severity of the injury, as well as hospital resources

    Comparison of Maxillofacial Trauma Patterns in the Urban Versus Suburban Environment: A Pilot Study.

    Full text link
    Introduction: Assault appears to be the most frequent cause of facial fractures in certain urban trauma centers, possibly due to the ease of acquiring weapons and increasingly aggressive behavior. The objectives of this study were to identify specific demographic, socioeconomic, maxillofacial fracture, and assault patterns in urban versus suburban communities. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained maxillofacial fractures from August 2014 through August 2016 at one urban campus, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, and two suburban campuses, Einstein Medical Center Montgomery and Elkins Park. The χ2 testing was used to compare the categorical variables between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 259 maxillofacial trauma patients were identified, with 204 (79%) in the urban and 55 (21%) in the suburban environment. Patients in the urban population were more likely to be African American (70% vs 33%) and Hispanic (15% vs 6%) but less likely to be Caucasian (12% vs 55%, P \u3c .0001). Urban patients were more likely to be single (70% vs 47%, P \u3c .01), unemployed (64% vs 44%, P \u3c .001), and receive Medicaid coverage (58% vs 26%, P \u3c .001). Urban patients were more likely to be victims of assault (63% vs 44%), whereas suburban patients were more likely to sustain accidental injuries (16% vs 2%, P \u3c .0001). Urban victims were more likely to be assaulted with an object (30% vs 12%) or gun (7% vs 0%, P = .05). Conclusion: Maxillofacial trauma patterns were shown to be significantly different in the urban versus suburban environment

    Pediatric Bronchogenic Cysts: A Case Series of Six Patients Highlighting Diagnosis and Management

    Full text link
    PURPOSE: To present six cases of bronchogenic cysts while highlighting the diagnosis and management of this anomaly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted using our institution\u27s Pathology database. The database was queried for bronchogenic cyst. From 2006 through 2017, six unusual cases were identified. RESULTS: The six cases of bronchogenic cysts were located in the neck (two cases), chest wall, mediastinum (two cases), and thyroid. All six of our patients underwent complete excision and did not experience recurrence or other complications. CONCLUSION: Although rare, bronchogenic cysts should be considered in the differential diagnosis of peculiar cystic masses in the pediatric population. Considering the crucial regional anatomy that may be associated with bronchogenic cysts, intimate knowledge of surgical anatomy using preoperative imaging is critical in most cases for their safe and effective excision

    Pediatric Bronchogenic Cysts: A Case Series of Six Patients Highlighting Diagnosis and Management

    Full text link
    Purpose: To present six cases of bronchogenic cysts while highlighting the diagnosis and management of this anomaly. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted using our institution’s Pathology database. The database was queried for “bronchogenic cyst.” From 2006 through 2017, six unusual cases were identified. Results: The six cases of bronchogenic cysts were located in the neck (two cases), chest wall, mediastinum (two cases), and thyroid. All six of our patients underwent complete excision and did not experience recurrence or other complications. Conclusion: Although rare, bronchogenic cysts should be considered in the differential diagnosis of peculiar cystic masses in the pediatric population. Considering the crucial regional anatomy that may be associated with bronchogenic cysts, intimate knowledge of surgical anatomy using preoperative imaging is critical in most cases for their safe and effective excision

    Management of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures and a Review of External Fixation Techniques.

    Full text link
    Introduction: Fractures of the zygomatic bone can present with complicated aesthetic and neurological pathology. Specifically, management of isolated zygomatic fracture has been sparsely discussed in the literature, and most studies are based upon older techniques. Here, we compare the results of 2 critical operative techniques as well as review the available literature in the setting of isolated zygomatic fractures. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at our institution from 2010 to 2018 examining for patients who had sustained an isolated zygomatic fracture confirmed by computed tomography scan. Patients were excluded if they sustained additional maxillofacial fractures. Demographical information, symptoms on presentation, fracture management modality, and postoperative course were all collected and examined. Results: A total of 218 patients were identified for inclusion. The average age of this cohort was 45.5 ± 18 years, with 77.5% being male. Assault (55%) was most the frequent cause of injury with accidents being the least common (17.9%). Most patients (78.8%) underwent nonoperative management. Patients who underwent operation more often presented with zygomatic deformity (97.7% vs 18.4%), paresthesia (29.5% vs 2.9%), and trismus (29.5% vs 6.9%) when compared to their nonoperatively managed counterparts. In all, 44 operatively managed patients underwent open reduction with or without eternal fixation (Gillies Approach vs Keen Approach). There were no significant differences in the presence of zygomatic deformity, paresthesia, and trismus between the 2 operative techniques. Conclusions: Isolated zygomatic arch fractures can present with discerning symptoms. Unfortunately, the literature on appropriate management is not well described. We find external fixation to provide reestablishment of both form and function with minimal required exposure, although the outcomes may be similar without the use of external fixation

    Comparing Urban Maxillofacial Trauma Patterns to the National Trauma Data Bank©

    Full text link
    OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether certain maxillofacial fracture patterns and injury mechanisms were more prevalent in an urban environment. In addition, we aimed to determine if maxillofacial trauma incidence correlated with income. METHODS: Data was collected from Einstein Healthcare Network and Temple University Health System. These data were compared to the 2016 National Trauma Data Bank© (NTDB©) using chi-square analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to identify correlations between demographic variables and fracture patterns. Sociodemographic data was further characterized utilizing neighborhood mapping. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients from our urban campuses and 14 447 patients from the NTDB© were identified with facial fractures. Maxillofacial trauma patients in the urban population were more likely to be minorities and less likely to be Caucasian compared to the NTDB© (P \u3c .001). Patients in the urban setting were more likely to sustain mandibular and orbital fractures, and less likely to sustain maxillary fractures and multiple fractures (P \u3c .001). Urban maxillofacial trauma patients were more likely to sustain assault and sporting injuries, and less likely to sustain injuries from motor vehicle accidents and self-harm (P \u3c .001). CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial trauma patterns and injury mechanisms were shown to be significantly different in an urban environment as compared to national data
    corecore