848 research outputs found
Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures
Learning algorithms related to artificial neural networks and in particular
for Deep Learning may seem to involve many bells and whistles, called
hyper-parameters. This chapter is meant as a practical guide with
recommendations for some of the most commonly used hyper-parameters, in
particular in the context of learning algorithms based on back-propagated
gradient and gradient-based optimization. It also discusses how to deal with
the fact that more interesting results can be obtained when allowing one to
adjust many hyper-parameters. Overall, it describes elements of the practice
used to successfully and efficiently train and debug large-scale and often deep
multi-layer neural networks. It closes with open questions about the training
difficulties observed with deeper architectures
Equilibrium Propagation: Bridging the Gap Between Energy-Based Models and Backpropagation
We introduce Equilibrium Propagation, a learning framework for energy-based
models. It involves only one kind of neural computation, performed in both the
first phase (when the prediction is made) and the second phase of training
(after the target or prediction error is revealed). Although this algorithm
computes the gradient of an objective function just like Backpropagation, it
does not need a special computation or circuit for the second phase, where
errors are implicitly propagated. Equilibrium Propagation shares similarities
with Contrastive Hebbian Learning and Contrastive Divergence while solving the
theoretical issues of both algorithms: our algorithm computes the gradient of a
well defined objective function. Because the objective function is defined in
terms of local perturbations, the second phase of Equilibrium Propagation
corresponds to only nudging the prediction (fixed point, or stationary
distribution) towards a configuration that reduces prediction error. In the
case of a recurrent multi-layer supervised network, the output units are
slightly nudged towards their target in the second phase, and the perturbation
introduced at the output layer propagates backward in the hidden layers. We
show that the signal 'back-propagated' during this second phase corresponds to
the propagation of error derivatives and encodes the gradient of the objective
function, when the synaptic update corresponds to a standard form of
spike-timing dependent plasticity. This work makes it more plausible that a
mechanism similar to Backpropagation could be implemented by brains, since
leaky integrator neural computation performs both inference and error
back-propagation in our model. The only local difference between the two phases
is whether synaptic changes are allowed or not
- …