2 research outputs found

    Smoking at time of CIS increases the risk of clinically definite multiple sclerosis

    Get PDF
    Background: Cigarette smoking is a modifiable risk factor that influences the disease course of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), there are conflicting results about the association between smoking and the risk of a subsequent MS diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of clinically definite MS (CDMS) in smoking and non-smoking patients at time of a first demyelinating event. Methods: Two hundred and fifty patients, aged 18–50 years, were included in our prospective CIS cohort. At time of the first neurological symptoms, patients completed a questionnaire about smoking habits. Cox regression analyses were performed to calculate univariate and multivariate hazard ratios for CDMS diagnosis in smoking and non-smoking CIS patients. Results: One hundred and fourteen (46%) CIS patients were diagnosed with CDMS during a mean follow-up of 58 months. In total, 79 (32%) patients smoked at time of CIS. Sixty-seven % of the smoking CIS patients were diagnosed with CDMS during follow-up compared to 36% of the non-smoking CIS patients (p < 0.001). Smoking at time of CIS was an independent predictor for CDMS diagnosis (HR 2.3; p = 0.002). Non-smoking CIS patients who had a history of smoking did not have a higher risk for CDMS than those who had never smoked. Conclusions: Smoking at time of CIS was an independent risk factor for a future CDMS diagnosis. This is an additional argument to quit smoking at time of the first attack of suspected MS

    HLA association in MOG-IgG- and AQP4-IgG-related disorders of the CNS in the Dutch population

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible human leukocyte antigen (HLA) association of both myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG)-associated diseases (MOGAD) and aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) in the Dutch population with European ancestry to clarify similarities or differences in the immunogenetic background of both diseases. METHODS: Blood samples from patients in the Dutch national MS/NMOSD expert clinic were tested for MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG using a cell-based assay. HLA Class I and II genotyping was performed in 43 MOG-IgG-seropositive and 42 AQP4-IgG-seropositive Dutch patients with European ancestry and compared with those of 5,604 Dutch healthy blood donors. RESULTS: No significant HLA association was found in MOG-IgG-seropositive patients. The AQP4-IgG-seropositive patients had a significant higher frequency of HLA-A*01 (61.9% vs 33.7%, OR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.707-5.863, p after correction [pc] = 0.0045), HLA-B*08 (61.9% vs 25.6%, OR 4.66, 95% CI, 2.513-8.643, pc < 0.0001), and HLA-DRB1*03 (51.2% vs 27.6%, OR 2.75, 95% CI, 1.495-5.042, pc = 0.0199) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates differences in the immunogenetic background of MOGAD and AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. The strong positive association with HLA-A*01, -B*08, and -DRB1*03 is suggestive of a role of this haplotype in the etiology of AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in patients with European ancestry, whereas in MOGAD no evidence was found for any HLA association in these disorders
    corecore