Dynamic changes of left atrial substrate over time following pulmonary vein isolation : the Progress-AF study

Abstract: Aims Little is known about dynamic changes of the left atrial (LA) substrate over time in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to evaluate substrate changes following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).Methods and results In our prospective observational study, consecutive patients undergoing first PVI-only and redo ablation were included. High-density maps of the two procedures were compared. Progression or regression was diagnosed if a significant concordant decrease or increase in bipolar voltages in >= 2 segments was observed, respectively. In 28 patients (61.2 +/- 9.5 years, 39% female, 53.5% persistent AF), 111.013 voltage points from 56 high-density LA maps (1.982 points/patient) were analysed. Comparing the high-density maps of the first and second procedures, in the progression group (17 patients, 61%), there was a decrease in global (-35%, P < 0.001) and all regional voltages. In the regression group (11 patients, 39%), there was an increase in global (+43%, P < 0.001) and regional voltages. Comparing the progression with the regression group, the area of low-voltage zone (LVZ) increased (+3.5 vs. -4.5 cm(2), P < 0.001) and LA activation time prolonged (+8.0 vs. -9.1 ms, P = 0.005). Baseline clinical parameters did not predict progression or regression. In patients with substrate progression, pulmonary veins (PVs) were more frequently isolated (P = 0.02) and the AF pattern at recurrence was more frequently persistent (P = 0.005).Conclusion Our study describes bidirectional dynamic properties of the LA substrate with concordant either progressive or regressive changes. Regression occurs with reduced AF burden after the first procedure, while progression is associated with persistent AF recurrence despite durable PV isolation. The dynamic nature of LA substrate poses questions about LVZ-based ablation strategies

A new prediction model for left ventricular systolic function recovery after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: The ANTWOORD Study

in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), AF ablation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), along with prognosis, in a variable percentage of patients. We aimed to investigate the predictors of LVEF recovery after AF ablation and to develop a prediction model for individualized assessment

A new prediction model for left ventricular systolic function recovery after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure The ANTWOORD Study

in patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), AF ablation improves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), along with prognosis, in a variable percentage of patients. We aimed to investigate the predictors of LVEF recovery after AF ablation and to develop a prediction model for individualized assessment

Introducing TOPMAST, the first double-blind randomized clinical trial specifically dedicated to perioperative maintenance fluid therapy in adults

Background: Although prescribed to every patient undergoing surgery, maintenance fluid therapy is a poorly researched part of perioperative fluid therapy. The tonicity of the chosen solutions, could be an important cause of morbidity, with hyponatremia being a potential side effect of hypotonic solutions, where isotonic solution could lead to fluid overload. Methods: The TOPMAST-trial is an ongoing prospective single-center double-blind randomized trial comparing an isotonic and a hypotonic maintenance fluid strategy during and after surgery in patients undergoing different types of major thoracic surgery. Patients receive NaCl 0.9% in glucose 5% with an added 40 mmol L-1 of potassium chloride or a premixed solution containing 54 mmol L-1 sodium, 55 mmol L-1 chloride and 26 mmol of potassium at a rate of 27 mL per kg of body weight per day. The primary hypothesis is that isotonic maintenance solutions cause a more positive perioperative fluid balance than hypotonic fluids. Different secondary safety endpoints will be explored, especially the effect of the study treatments on the occurrence electrolyte disturbances (e.g. hyponatremia, hyperchloremia) and a set of clinical endpoints. Efficacy endpoints include the need for resuscitation fluids and assessment of renal and hormonal adaptive mechanisms. An anticipated 68 patients will be included between March 2017 and January 2018. Discussion: The study will provide the most comprehensive evaluation of clinically important outcomes associated with the choice of perioperative maintenance fluid therapy