Functional Constipation and Fecal Incontinence

Constipation and fecal incontinence represent common problems in children. Beyond the neonatal period, only a minority of children have an organic cause for their constipation, and the etiology remains not well understood. Constipation rarely leads to life-threatening complications but can cause emotional and physical distress and concerns for children and their families, ultimately impairing health-related quality of life. The hallmarks of constipation are infrequent painful defecation and fecal incontinence often accompanied by abdominal pain. In less than 15% of cases, children have fecal incontinence without a history and physical examination that indicates underlying constipation. These latter children are classified as having functional nonretentive fecal incontinence (FNRFI) according to the Rome IV criteria. The aims of this chapter are to describe functional defecation disorders in children: functional constipation associated with or without fecal incontinence and FNRFI. The chapter will also describe diagnostic approaches and treatment regimens for this disorder and will report on treatment outcomes

Management of functional constipation in children and adults

Functional constipation is common in children and adults worldwide. Functional constipation shows similarities in children and adults, but important differences also exist regarding epidemiology, symptomatology, pathophysiology, diagnostic workup and therapeutic management. In children, the approach focuses on the behavioural nature of the disorder and the initial therapeutic steps involve toilet training and laxatives. In adults, management focuses on excluding an underlying cause and differentiating between different subtypes of functional constipation — normal transit, slow transit or an evacuation disorder — which has important therapeutic consequences. Treatment of adult functional constipation involves lifestyle interventions, pelvic floor interventions (in the presence of a rectal evacuation disorder) and pharmacological therapy. When conventional treatments fail, children and adults are considered to have intractable functional constipation, a troublesome and distressing condition. Intractable constipation is managed with a stepwise approach and in rare cases requires surgical interventions such as antegrade continence enemas in children or colectomy procedures for adults. New drugs, including prokinetic and prosecretory agents, and surgical strategies, such as sacral nerve stimulation, have the potential to improve the management of children and adults with intractable functional constipation

Assessing Children's Report of Stool Consistency: Agreement Between the Pediatric Rome III Questionnaire and the Bristol Stool Scale

Objectives To assess the agreement between the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Rome III (QPGS-RIII) and the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) in evaluating stool consistency and the diagnosis of functional constipation in children. Study design Children aged 8-18 years were asked to describe their stool consistency in the previous month according to the QPGS-RIII and the BSS. Stool consistency according to both instruments was categorized into 3 categories: "hard," "normal," and "liquid." The children's reported stool consistency using the QPGS-RIII and the BSS were compared, and the intrarater agreement between the 2 instruments was measured using the Cohen kappa coefficient (k). The diagnosis of functional constipation was based on the Rome III criteria, incorporating the assessment of stool consistency according to the QPGS-RIII and the BSS. Results A total of 1835 children were included. Only slight agreement existed between the QPGS-RIII and the BSS for assessing stool consistency (k = .046; P = .022). Significantly more children reported hard stools on the BSS compared to the QPGS-RIII (18.0% vs 7.1%; P = .000). The prevalence of functional constipation was 8.6% using the QPGS-RIII and 9.3% using the BSS (P = .134). Conclusions Only slight agreement exists between the QPGS-RIII and the BSS in the evaluation of stool consistency in children. Better instruments are needed to assess the consistency of stools with a high degree of reliability, both in research and in the clinical settin

Prevalence of suspected child abuse in children with constipation: A case-control study

Background A possible association between child abuse and neglect (CAN) and functional constipation (FC) has been described in adults, however, limited data are available in children. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of suspected CAN in children with FC as compared with their healthy peers. Methods A case-control study was carried out in children aged 3-10 years. Children with FC were recruited at a tertiary outpatient clinic, and healthy controls were recruited at schools. Parents were asked to fill out questionnaires about the history and behaviour of their child, children were inquired using a semistructured interview about experienced traumatic events and sexual knowledge. The interview was scored by two independent observers. The prevalence of suspected CAN was determined according to the questionnaires and interview. Results In total, 228 children with FC and 153 healthy controls were included. Both groups were age and gender comparable (50% females, median age 6 years (not significant)). No significant difference in the prevalence of suspected CAN was found between children with FC and healthy controls (23.3% vs 30.1%, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.12, p=0.14), including a suspicion of sexual, emotional and physical abuse. Conclusion Suspected CAN was detected in both children with FC as in healthy controls. The possible association between CAN and FC in children could not be confirmed

Do we need an extra dimension? A pilot study on the use of three-dimensional anorectal manometry in children with functional constipation

Background: Recently, a new high-definition (or three-dimensional “3D”) high-resolution anorectal manometry (3D-ARM) catheter has been introduced. This catheter allows for a more detailed visualization of the anal canal. However, its clinical utility and tolerability in children with constipation are unknown. Our primary objective was to evaluate the agreement between findings from solid-state high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and 3D-ARM. Secondary objectives were to investigate if 3D-ARM has additional value over HR-ARM and to evaluate patient and provider experience. Methods: Prospective pilot study including children (8–18 years of age) with functional constipation scheduled for anorectal manometry. Children underwent HR-ARM and 3D-ARM consecutively. We compared manometry results of both procedures and collected data on patient and provider experience via self-developed questionnaires. Key Results: Data of ten patients were analyzed (60% female, median age 14.9 years). In the majority of patients, ARMs were performed awake (n = 8, 80%). In two patients, the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was visualized during HR-ARM but not during 3D-ARM. Anal canal resting pressures were significantly higher during 3D-ARM compared to HR-ARM (median 77 mmHg [IQR 59–94] vs. 69 mmHg [IQR 51–91], respectively, p = 0.037). No significant anatomical or muscular abnormalities were visualized during the 3D-ARM. The majority of children identified the 3D-ARM as the more unpleasant (5/7 [71%]) and more painful procedure (6/7 [86%]) and therefore preferred the HR-ARM (4/7 [57%]). Conclusions & Inferences: In our patient sample, 3D-ARM was associated with more discomfort without providing more useful information and even resulted in an inconsistent visualization of the RAIR

Quality of Life in Children with Functional Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To systematically review the literature on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with functional constipation and to identify disease-related factors associated with HRQoL. Study design: The Pubmed, Embase, and PsycINFO database were searched. Studies were included if they prospectively assessed HRQoL in children with functional constipation according to the Rome criteria. Articles were excluded if patients had organic causes of constipation and if HRQoL was only assessed after successful therapeutic interventions. A meta-analysis was performed calculating sample size–weighted pooled mean and SD of HRQoL scores. The quality of the studies was also assessed. Results: A total of 20 of 2658 studies were included, providing HRQoL data for 2344 children. Quality of evidence was considered to be poor in 9 of the 20 studies (45%); 13 of the 20 studies reported sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. Pooled total HRQoL scores of children with functional constipation were found to be lower compared with healthy reference samples (65.6 vs 86.1; P < .01). Similar HRQoL scores were found according to self-report and parent proxy report. Hospital-based studies reported lower HRQoL scores as compared with community-based studies. Two studies reported on HRQoL scores of children with and without fecal incontinence, but no significant difference was found. Conclusions: HRQoL is compromised in children with functional constipation