12 research outputs found

    Treatment of the hyperventilation syndrome with bisoprolol:A placebo-controlled clinical trial

    No full text
    The hyperventilation syndrome (HVS) can be regarded as a form of panic disorder associated with a relative increase in sympathomimetic tone, the effects of which can be counterbalanced by beta-adrenoceptor blockade. The efficacy of the beta-blocker bisoprolol was investigated in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised crossover trial involving 60 patients from 17 general practices. Following a single-blind placebo prephase, patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomised to treatment with either 5 mg bisoprolol or an identical-looking placebo tablet once daily for three weeks. They were then crossed over to the other treatment arm. At the end of each treatment phase the number of hyperventilation attacks and the severity of symptoms were assessed and side effects recorded. The number of attacks decreased from 4.04 per week at baseline to 3.52 with placebo and to 1.26 with bisoprolol. The decrease of attacks with bisoprolol was significant (p &lt;0.05) compared to baseline and placebo. The severity of the complaints improved from 29 (scale 0 to 64) at baseline not significantly to 26 with placebo and significantly (p &lt;0.05) to 15 with bisoprolol. No serious side effects were reported. Five milligrams of bisoprolol once daily is effective and safe in the maintenance of symptom reduction in patients with the hyperventilation syndrome.</p

    THE INFLUENCE OF CHRONIC TREATMENT WITH BETA-BLOCKADE AND ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION ON THE PERIPHERAL-BLOOD FLOW IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT CONCOMITANT INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION - A COMPARATIVE CROSS-OVER TRIAL

    No full text
    In a comparative cross-over trial we examined the influence of the betablocker bisoprolol and the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril on the peripheral blood flow of 2 groups of hypertensive patients with and without concomitant intermittent claudication. In 11 patients with hypertension without peripheral arterial obstructive disease and 11 patients with hypertension and claudication we assessed the blood pressure, leg blood flow, vascular resistance, walking distance, transcutaneous oxygen consumption and Laser-Doppler flow after treatment of one month with 10 mg bisoprolol once daily or 20 mg lisinopril once daily. The walking distance of patients with claudication improved in all patients while participating in an exercise program. For both treatment groups this improvement was significant (p <0.05) compared to baseline, from 264 m at baseline to 313 m with bisoprolol and to 400 m with lisinopril. The difference was not significant between the both drugs. In patients without peripheral vascular obstructive disease we found a significant (p <0.05) reduction in blood flow for both drugs. The peripheral blood flow parameters of 38 legs showed no statistical significant effect of bisoprolol nor lisinopril on the local vascular resistance at rest, after occlusion or after exercise

    THE INFLUENCE OF CHRONIC TREATMENT WITH BETA-BLOCKADE AND ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION ON THE PERIPHERAL-BLOOD FLOW IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT CONCOMITANT INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION - A COMPARATIVE CROSS-OVER TRIAL

    No full text
    In a comparative cross-over trial we examined the influence of the betablocker bisoprolol and the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril on the peripheral blood flow of 2 groups of hypertensive patients with and without concomitant intermittent claudication. In 11 patients with hypertension without peripheral arterial obstructive disease and 11 patients with hypertension and claudication we assessed the blood pressure, leg blood flow, vascular resistance, walking distance, transcutaneous oxygen consumption and Laser-Doppler flow after treatment of one month with 10 mg bisoprolol once daily or 20 mg lisinopril once daily. The walking distance of patients with claudication improved in all patients while participating in an exercise program. For both treatment groups this improvement was significant (p <0.05) compared to baseline, from 264 m at baseline to 313 m with bisoprolol and to 400 m with lisinopril. The difference was not significant between the both drugs. In patients without peripheral vascular obstructive disease we found a significant (p <0.05) reduction in blood flow for both drugs. The peripheral blood flow parameters of 38 legs showed no statistical significant effect of bisoprolol nor lisinopril on the local vascular resistance at rest, after occlusion or after exercise
    corecore