41 research outputs found
What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
Get PDFSupreme court of the U. States. January term, 1834. The United States, vs. John Huertas Appeal from the Superior court for the District of East Florida. [Washington, D. C. 1834].
No full textOn verso: D.Page Order: Leafle
Joshua Scholefield, and John Taylor, plaintiffs in error, vs. Jesse Eichelberber, Surviving partner of John Clemm, defendants in error. In the Supreme Court of the United States, January, 1832.
No full textPage Order: Leafle
Supreme court of the United States. John Reynolds. vs. Duncan M'Arthur lessee. Error to the Supreme court of Ohio, for the County of Champaign. [n. p. 18--].
No full textPage Order: Uncut Quart
In the Supreme court of the United States. February session 1816. The United States, vs. The schooner L'Epine, M. Batigne, Claimant, No. 91. Appeal from the Louisiana district. Statement on the part of the United States ... [1816].
No full textSupreme court of the U. States. January term, 1834. The United States vs. Antonop Huertas. Appeal from the Superior court of East Florida ... R. K. Call, for appelant. [Washington, D. C. 1834].
No full textPage Order: Leafle
In the supreme court of the United States. February sessions, 1816. The Brig. Franklin and Cargo. vs. The United States. No. 26 Appeal from the District of Rhode Island. Statement on the part of the United States ... [1816].
No full textThe United States, vs. the ship William, John Caig, claimant.- Appellants statement. [1811].
No full textOn p. [4] : 1811.Page Order: Leafle
Supreme court of the U. States. January term 1834. No. 64. The United States, Plaintiff in error, versus Tench Ringgold. Statement for plaintiff in error. [Washington, 1834].
No full textPage Order: Leafle
