3 research outputs found

    Intra-annual rainfall variability control on interannual variability of catchment water balance: A stochastic analysis

    No full text
    We evaluate the extent to which within-year rainfall variability controls interannual variability of catchment water balance. To this end, we analytically derive the probability density function of the annual Budyko evaporation index, B (i.e., the ratio of annual actual evapotranspiration to annual precipitation), by accounting for the stochastic nature of intra-annual rainfall fluctuation and neglecting all other sources of variability. We apply our analytical model to 424 catchments located in different climatic regions across the conterminous United States to perform this assessment. In general, we found that the model is capable of explaining mean B but is less accurate in predicting its coefficient of variation. Nonetheless, in a significant number of catchments the model can provide adequate predictions of the probability density function of B. Clear geographic patterns can be distinguished in the residuals between observed and predicted statistics of B. Interannual variability is thus not always associated with random intra-annual rainfall fluctuations. In some regions, other controls, such as seasonality and vegetation adaptations, are possibly more important. A sensitivity analysis of model parameters helped characterize the dominant controls on the distribution of B in terms of three dimensionless ratios that include climatic and soil characteristics. This study represents the first step in a diagnostic, data-driven analysis of the climatic controls on the interannual variability of catchment water balance.Water ManagementCivil Engineering and Geoscience

    Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA

    Get PDF
    Hydrologic similarity between catchments, derived from similarity in how catchments respond to precipitation input, is the basis for catchment classification, for transferability of information, for generalization of our hydrologic understanding and also for understanding the potential impacts of environmental change. An important question in this context is, how far can widely available hydrologic information (precipitation-temperature-streamflow data and generally available physical descriptors) be used to create a first order grouping of hydrologically similar catchments? We utilize a heterogeneous dataset of 280 catchments located in the Eastern US to understand hydrologic similarity in a 6-dimensional signature space across a region with strong environmental gradients. Signatures are defined as hydrologic response characteristics that provide insight into the hydrologic function of catchments. A Bayesian clustering scheme is used to separate the catchments into 9 homogeneous classes, which enable us to interpret hydrologic similarity with respect to similarity in climatic and landscape attributes across this region. We finally derive several hypotheses regarding controls on individual signatures from the analysis performed here.Civil Engineering and Geoscience

    The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world

    No full text
    Human activities exert global-scale impacts on our environment with significant implications for freshwater-driven services and hazards for humans and nature. Our approach to the science of hydrology needs to significantly change so that we can understand and predict these implications. Such an adjustment is a necessary prerequisite for the development of sustainable water resource management strategies and to achieve long-term water security for people and the environment. Hydrology requires a paradigm shift in which predictions of system behavior that are beyond the range of previously observed variability or that result from significant alterations of physical (structural) system characteristics become the new norm. To achieve this shift, hydrologists must become both synthesists, observing and analyzing the system as a holistic entity, and analysts, understanding the functioning of individual system components, while operating firmly within a well-designed hypothesis testing framework. Cross-disciplinary integration must become a primary characteristic of hydrologic research, catalyzing new research and nurturing new educational models. The test of our quantitative understanding across atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere will necessarily lie in new approaches to benchmark our ability to predict the regional hydrologic and connected implications of environmental change. To address these challenges and to serve as a catalyst to bring about the necessary changes to hydrologic science, we call for a long-term initiative to address the regional implications of environmental change.Water ManagementCivil Engineering and Geoscience
    corecore