Customary Title, Heritage Protection, and Property Rights in Australia: Emerging Patterns of Land Use in the Post-\u3ci\u3eMabo\u3c/i\u3e Era

The Mabo decision represented a major doctrinal change in the relationship between Indigenous people and the settler legal system. However, significant legislative developments in land use and management recognizing some Indigenous interests in land had already laid the groundwork for joint land management schemes and concurrent land uses. These developments have formed the basis for ongoing expansion of coexistent land uses with the negotiation of formal and informal agreements for co-management of land. A range of factors influence these agreements, including the existence of enforceable property rights and non-property based heritage protection legislation. These regimes are currently in a state of flux. In an uncertain political environment there are possibilities for further recognition of Indigenous involvement in land management. There are also real possibilities for contraction of the limited rights of Indigenous people over land. Either development will impact the significant involvement of Indigenous people in resource and environmental management

A tale of two cultures. by Maureen Tehan

Hindmarsh Island Bridge : protection requires the disclosures of secrets

The Commonwealth and Land Rights before Mabo : Practising land rights: the Pitjantjatjara in the Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia. by Maureen Tehan

tag=1 data=The Commonwealth and Land Rights before Mabo : Practising land rights: the Pitjantjatjara in the Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia. by Maureen Tehan tag=2 data=Tehan, Maureen tag=3 data=Australian Quarterly, tag=4 data=65 tag=5 data=4 tag=6 data=Summer 1993 tag=7 data=34-54. tag=8 data=ABORIGINAL LAND RIGHTS%MINES & MINERALS%ABORIGINAL CULTURE tag=9 data=LAND TENURE%NATIVE TITLE%ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCILS%SACRED SITES%COMPENSATION tag=13 data=IN

The Recording and Management of Indigenous Lands and Title: Is Reform Required?

Systems for assessing and recording indigenous lands are critical to the continued recognition and enforcement of indigenous titles and for the effective management of indigenous titles. With the increasing number of native title determinations in Australia it is timely to review the systems of land administration that capture and manage indigenous lands and consider if reforms to these systems are required. Indigenous land holdings in Australia are reviewed with a focus on the recording and registration of such systems. This article questions whether the current system for recording native title in Australia is adequate and whether a search for a more appropriate title recording system should be undertaken

Transparency in Resource Agreements with Indigenous People in Australia

This working paper examines transparency requirements in agreement making with Indigenous People. In particular, this working paper examines resource payments provided to Indigenous entities or individuals, under a variety of types of agreementsmade by Indigenous peoples with resource companies, and/or governments. In general, these resource payments are made as part of obtaining a social licence to carry out resource activity on Indigenous lands, and in a process of a resource company gaining approval for exploration or production licenses.Benefits made under agreements can include monetary and non-monetary benefits such as training, education and employment benefits. Payments or other benefits are provided by resource companies to Indigenous peoples in relation to investment in oil, gas, mining exploration or production in Australia under various legal regimes and in a range of forms. We call the many diverse payments and benefits that may be provided to Indigenous people under these regimes resource payments for ease of reference in this working paper. Resource payments may be provided to Indigenous entities or individuals, under a variety of types of agreement made by Indigenous peoples with resource companies, and/or governments. In general,these resource payments are made as part of obtaining a social licence to carry out resource activity on Indigenous lands, and in a process of a resource company gaining approval for exploration or production licenses.Overall, there are minimal or no public disclosure requirements for most types of resource payments, in law and practice in Australia. There is also, in general, no legislative prohibition of disclosure or public reporting of resource payments. Most resource payments are made under contractual agreements between resource companies and Indigenous communities. Subject to normal contractual rules, the parties (resource companies and Indigenous communities) could agree to disclose or report resource payments. However, most do not. Australian lawdoes require some reporting of the existence of agreements under which resource payments are made and the parties to those agreements, and also requires some reporting by Indigenous entities of sources of income including resource payments that they receive. There is a spectrum of legal requirements for public disclosure and transparency of resource payments made to Indigenous people by governments and resource companies. Consequently, in this working paper, we organise the different entities and agreements under which resource payments are made, along a spectrum of transparency from those agreements or entities with the greatest amount of publicly available information, to those agreements which are least transparent.Part 1 of this working paper examines the level of transparency in resource payments. Part 2 examines the range of potential benefits that an Indigenous party to an agreement may receive, the potential value of such benefits and the regulatory requirements in relation to received agreement benefits. Part 3summarises reporting requirements for entities that receive resource paymentsand part 4summarises reporting requirements for agreements under which resource payments are made.This report was commisioned by Agreements, Treaties and Negotiated Settlements Projec