Identification and estimation of survivor average causal effects

In longitudinal studies, outcomes ascertained at follow-up are typically undefined for individuals who die prior to the follow-up visit. In such settings, outcomes are said to be truncated by death and inference about the effects of a point treatment or exposure, restricted to individuals alive at the follow-up visit, could be biased even if as in experimental studies, treatment assignment were randomized. To account for truncation by death, the survivor average causal effect (SACE) defines the effect of treatment on the outcome for the subset of individuals who would have survived regardless of exposure status. In this paper, the author nonparametrically identifies SACE by leveraging post-exposure longitudinal correlates of survival and outcome that may also mediate the exposure effects on survival and outcome. Nonparametric identification is achieved by supposing that the longitudinal data arise from a certain nonparametric structural equations model and by making the monotonicity assumption that the effect of exposure on survival agrees in its direction across individuals. A novel weighted analysis involving a consistent estimate of the survival process is shown to produce consistent estimates of SACE. A data illustration is given, and the methods are extended to the context of time-varying exposures. We discuss a sensitivity analysis framework that relaxes assumptions about independent errors in the nonparametric structural equations model and may be used to assess the extent to which inference may be altered by a violation of key identifying assumptions. © 2014 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Semiparametric theory for causal mediation analysis: Efficiency bounds, multiple robustness and sensitivity analysis

While estimation of the marginal (total) causal effect of a point exposure on an outcome is arguably the most common objective of experimental and observational studies in the health and social sciences, in recent years, investigators have also become increasingly interested in mediation analysis. Specifically, upon evaluating the total effect of the exposure, investigators routinely wish to make inferences about the direct or indirect pathways of the effect of the exposure, through a mediator variable or not, that occurs subsequently to the exposure and prior to the outcome. Although powerful semiparametric methodologies have been developed to analyze observational studies that produce double robust and highly efficient estimates of the marginal total causal effect, similar methods for mediation analysis are currently lacking. Thus, this paper develops a general semiparametric framework for obtaining inferences about so-called marginal natural direct and indirect causal effects, while appropriately accounting for a large number of pre-exposure confounding factors for the exposure and the mediator variables. Our analytic framework is particularly appealing, because it gives new insights on issues of efficiency and robustness in the context of mediation analysis. In particular, we propose new multiply robust locally efficient estimators of the marginal natural indirect and direct causal effects, and develop a novel double robust sensitivity analysis framework for the assumption of ignorability of the mediator variable.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/12-AOS990 the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

On a Closed-form Doubly Robust Estimator of the Adjusted Odds Ratio for a Binary Exposure

Epidemiologic studies often aim to estimate the odds ratio for the association between a binary exposure and a binary disease outcome. Because confounding bias is of serious concern in observational studies, investigators typically estimate the adjusted odds ratio in a multivariate logistic regression which conditions on a large number of potential confounders. It is well known that modeling error in specification of the confounders can lead to substantial bias in the adjusted odds ratio for exposure. As a remedy, Tchetgen Tchetgen et al. (Biometrika. 2010;97(1):171–180) recently developed so-called doubly robust estimators of an adjusted odds ratio by carefully combining standard logistic regression with reverse regression analysis, in which exposure is the dependent variable and both the outcome and the confounders are the independent variables. Double robustness implies that only one of the 2 modeling strategies needs to be correct in order to make valid inferences about the odds ratio parameter. In this paper, I aim to introduce this recent methodology into the epidemiologic literature by presenting a simple closed-form doubly robust estimator of the adjusted odds ratio for a binary exposure. A SAS macro (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina) is given in an online appendix to facilitate use of the approach in routine epidemiologic practice, and a simulated data example is also provided for the purpose of illustration

A General Regression Framework for a Secondary Outcome in Case-control Studies

Modern case–control studies typically involve the collection of data on a large number of outcomes, often at considerable logistical and monetary expense. These data are of potentially great value to subsequent researchers, who, although not necessarily concerned with the disease that defined the case series in the original study, may want to use the available information for a regression analysis involving a secondary outcome. Because cases and controls are selected with unequal probability, regression analysis involving a secondary outcome generally must acknowledge the sampling design. In this paper, the author presents a new framework for the analysis of secondary outcomes in case–control studies. The approach is based on a careful re-parameterization of the conditional model for the secondary outcome given the case–control outcome and regression covariates, in terms of (a) the population regression of interest of the secondary outcome given covariates and (b) the population regression of the case–control outcome on covariates. The error distribution for the secondary outcome given covariates and case–control status is otherwise unrestricted. For a continuous outcome, the approach sometimes reduces to extending model (a) by including a residual of (b) as a covariate. However, the framework is general in the sense that models (a) and (b) can take any functional form, and the methodology allows for an identity, log or logit link function for model (a)