6 research outputs found

    The Relationship Between Shoulder Range of Motion and Arm Stress in College Pitchers: A MOTUS Baseball Study

    Get PDF
    The Relationship Between Shoulder Range of Motion and Arm Stress in College Pitchers: A MOTUS Baseball Study Abstract Predictors of Elbow Torque Among College Baseball Pitchers Purpose: To investigate the relationship of shoulder range of motion (ROM) conditions, such as glenohumeral internal rotation deficiency (GIRD) and external rotation gain (ERG), to torque across the medial elbow in college pitchers. Methods: Pitchers were recruited from three local college baseball teams. Exclusion criteria included injury or restricted activity due to pain. They were evaluated within two weeks before their first game of the season. Pitchers completed an intake survey at the time of shoulder ROM and upper extremity length measurements. Pitchers were fitted with a MOTUS sensor baseball sleeve (Motus Global, Massapequa, NY). The sensor placed at the medial elbow reported elbow torque, arm speed, arm slot, and shoulder rotation for each pitch, while a radar gun measured peak ball velocity. After adequate warmup, pitchers threw 5 fastballs in a standardized manner off the mound at game-speed effort. The primary outcome was to evaluate the relationship between shoulder ROM and medial elbow torque. Additional outcomes evaluated pitcher characteristics, demographics, and outcome scores in the context of shoulder ROM. Outcomes were assessed via a multivariable model, which controlled for possible covariates. Results: Twenty-eight pitchers were included in the preseason analysis with an average (SD) age of 20.1 (1.3) years and playing experience of 15.3 (1.8) years, 2.5 (1.2) of those years at collegiate level. The dominant shoulder demonstrated decreased internal rotation (54.5+/-10.6 vs 65.8+/-9.1) and increased external rotation (ER, 94.1+/-10.4 vs 88.4+/-9.2) relative to the non-dominant side (p \u3c 0.001), while total rotational range of motion (TRROM) was significantly decreased in the dominant arm (148.6+/-12.4 vs 154.1+/-10.6, p \u3c 0.001). The average GIRD was 11.3 (9.87) and average ERG was 4.4 (8.87). External rotation was found to be a predictor of arm stress, with an increase in 0.35 Nm of elbow torque for every degree increase in ER (beta = 0.35+/-0.06, p = 0.003); there was moderate correlation between ER and arm stress (r = .45, P\u3c.001). Pitchers demonstrated significantly greater arm stress with the following shoulder ROM measurements: GIRD \u3c 20 as compared to greater than 20 degrees (46.6 +/- 0.5 versus 43.5 +/- 1.1, P=.011), ERG \u3e 5 as compared to \u3c 5 degrees (47.4 +/- 0.7 versus 45.1 +/- 0.6, P=.014), and loss of total rotational ROM \u3c 5 as compared to \u3e 5 degrees (46.6 +/- 0.5 versus 43.6 +/- 1.1, P=.013). Conclusions: College pitchers with external rotation gain produced greater medial elbow torque during the pitching movement. These findings indicate that pitchers with increased external rotation of their throwing arm may experience greater elbow stress while pitching, placing their medial elbow at risk of injury. Level of Evidence: Level II prospective observational study Key Words: UCL, Ulnar Collateral Ligament, Pitching, Tommy John, Laxity, Pain, Elbow, Injur

    Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty: A Systematic Review of Height Restoration in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

    Get PDF
    Background: Back pain is a leading cause of morbidity in older US adults, especially those with osteoporosis. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) commonly occur in people with osteoporosis. ~1/3 of OVCF are symptomatic with acute or chronic low back pain. Annual US cases of osteoporosis with OVCF are ~700,000/year. OVCF and osteoporosis cause high levels of morbidity, decreased functional independence, and chronic pain. Conservative treatment for OVCF is often insufficient for many patients. Insufficient vertebral height caused by OVCF can lead to spinal deformities, reduced pulmonary function, depression, reduced mobility, and lower quality of life. Surgical correction is a viable option for increasing vertebral height in patients with OVCF. Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are vertebral augmentation therapies that can restore bone height for the alleviation of OVCF. Both procedures involve injection of a polymer cement into sites of fracture. Only kyphoplasty involves using an inflatable balloon to first make space for polymer injection. These minimally invasive procedures are recommended for patients who have OVCF but are refractory to conventional therapies. Also, patients with benign bone tumors or traumatic acute vertebral compression fractures with a local kyphotic angle greater than 15 degrees can benefit from these procedures. The aim of our systematic review was to identify the overall effectiveness of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Height restoration after treatment was used as the key indicator of therapeutic success. Restoration of function and pain relief were also assessed. Purpose: To critically investigate whether vertebral body height restoration correlates with pain relief after kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Primary Outcome: height restoration. Secondary Outcomes: pain relief, functionality, cement leakage, Cobb’s Angle, wedge angle restoration, kyphosis angle restoration, and Gardner’s angle. We assessed only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to generate a more robust and clinically applicable. We also provide an update on the literature comparing kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for height restoration, pain relief, and function restoration. We searched 6 databases to ensure that the review was comprehensive. Methods: We performed a systematic review per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. Level II randomized controlled trials assessing kyphoplasty and/or vertebroplasty were included. Study selection inclusion criteria: patients \u3e 18 years, in English, study of OVCF, active comparator vs placebo, outcome measure of height restoration, with pain relief and functionality as secondary outcomes. Of 4147 individual articles, 238 articles were screened, and 33 were analyzed. Of the 33 analyzed studies, 6 compared kyphoplasty to vertebroplasty. Results: Vertebral Height Restoration 7 studies of vertobroplasty 2 showed height loss 1 showed height restoration 2 showed absolute height gain 20 studies of kyphoplasty None showed height loss 8 showed height restoration 8 showed absolute height gain 6 head-to-head comparisons 3 showed correlation of cement injection volume with improved height 5 favored kyphoplasty for height restoration Alleviation of Pain: Assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS)score 6 of 6 vertebroplasty studies showed reduced postop pain 6 of 18 kyphoplasty studies showed sustained reduced pain at 12 months 6 studies compared kyphoplasty & vertebroplasty and none saw a difference between the 2 for reducing postop pain Restoration of Function Assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI) 3 studies showed improved ODI after vertebroplasty at 18 to 36 months postop 4 studies showed improved ODI at 12 months after kyphoplasty 3 studies compared kyphoplasty & vertebroplasty and all showed lower postop ODI Conclusions: Both kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are effective treatments for OVCF and are viable options for OVCF patients. Both treatments restored some vertebral body height, reduced kyphosis angle, improved Cobbs angle, and improved wedge angle. Both treatments showed similar benefits of pain reduction and improved functionality. It was unclear whether fracture type or age of fracture influence procedure outcomes. Kyphoplasty has the possibility of cement leakage, which can lead to negative outcomes. It was not possible to conclude whether one approach was superior.https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/sarcd2021/1006/thumbnail.jp

    Extensor Mechanism Ruptures and Reruptures: Perioperative Opioid Management

    No full text
    The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the correlation between preoperative and postoperative opioid use and (2) risk factors associated with rerupture in patients undergoing open extensor mechanism repair. A retrospective review of patients who underwent operative repair of quadriceps or patellar tendon rupture was performed. Patients were classified as opioid nonusers if they had not received any opioid medications in the 3 months before surgery, or as acute users or chronic users if they received at least one opioid prescription within 1 month or 3 months preceding surgery. Clinical records were reviewed for postoperative opioid use within a year after surgery as well as rerupture rates. A total of 144 quadriceps tendon and 15 patellar tendon repairs were performed at a mean age of 56.8 ± 15.1 years and body mass index of 33.2 ± 7.1. The overall rerupture rate was 6%. Diabetes was a significant risk factor for rerupture (56 vs. 19%, p = 0.023). Chronic preoperative opioid users were more likely to continue to use opioids beyond 1 month postoperatively (p \u3c 0.001) as compared with acute or nonopioid users. Chronic preoperative opioid users (relative risk [RR]: 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11-5.90) and patients with longer anesthesia time (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.93) required more monthly opioid refills, whereas tourniquet use required fewer opioid refills each month (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37-0.88). Compared with patients without a rerupture, each additional prescription refill after the initial repair in the rerupture group was associated with a 22% higher risk of tendon rerupture (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.39). The chronicity of preoperative opioid intake was found to have a significant effect on postoperative opioid use. This study suggests that there is a higher prevalence of rerupture in patients with prolonged opioid use postoperatively and among diabetics

    Maximum subjective outcome improvement is reported by 3 Months following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A systematic review

    No full text
    Purpose: To review patient outcomes in the literature following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) in order to identify when patients report reaching subjective maximal improvement postoperatively. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from January 2004 to August 2019 was conducted using PRISMA guidelines to identify articles evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) up to a minimum of 6 months after APM in patients \u3e18 years old. Studies were excluded if additional interventions were performed such as repairs, ligamentous reconstruction or repair, cartilaginous manipulation, or revision surgery. PROMs were pooled between studies at preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 year time points. Weighted averages were used within a mixed model method in order to account for the differences in sample size and variance among studies. Significant improvements in PROMs at various time intervals were statistically analyzed using minimal clinically important difference. Results: A total of 12 studies including 1663 patients who underwent APM were selected for the review. The pooled cohort consisted of 1033 (62%) males and 630 (38%) females. Significant improvements were demonstrated from preoperative scores to 3 months postoperatively in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subcategories, Lysholm, and visual analog scale scores while no differences were found for Tegner and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Although statistically significant improvement in PROMs remained at all postoperative time points compared to preoperative scores, no significant differences were observed after 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Patients undergoing APM had significant mean changes in legacy PROMs by 3 months postoperatively that exceeded given minimal clinically important difference values, without further clinically important improvement reported up to 2 years postoperatively. Study design: Level III, systematic review

    Balloon Kyphoplasty vs Vertebroplasty: A Systematic Review of Height Restoration in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

    No full text
    PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This systematic review comprehensively compared balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty with respect to height restoration and pain relief. RECENT FINDINGS: PRISMA guidelines were utilized to compare balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty, focusing on the primary outcome of height restoration and the secondary outcomes of pain relief and functionality. A total of 33 randomized controlled trials were included; 20 reviewed balloon kyphoplasty, 7 reviewed vertebroplasty, and 6 compared vertebroplasty to balloon kyphoplasty. Both treatments restored some vertebral body height and showed benefits in pain reduction and improved patient-reported functionality. SUMMARY: Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are effective treatments for vertebral compression fractures and this review suggests that balloon kyphoplasty may be favored for vertebral height restoration. Further studies are needed to conclude whether balloon kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty is superior for alleviating pain
    corecore