283 research outputs found

    Bacterial endosymbionts identified from leafhopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) vectors of phytoplasmas

    Get PDF
    Insects often harbor bacterial endosymbionts that provide them with nutritional benefit or with protection against natural enemies, plant defenses, insecticides, and abiotic stresses. Certain endosymbionts may also alter acquisition and transmission of plant pathogens by insect vectors. We identified bacterial endosymbionts from four leafhopper vectors (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma’ species by direct sequencing 16S rDNA and confirmed endosymbiont presence and identity by species-specific conventional PCR. We examined three vectors of Ca. Phytoplasma pruni, causal agent of cherry X-disease [Colladonus geminatus (Van Duzee), Colladonus montanus reductus (Van Duzee), Euscelidius variegatus (Kirschbaum)] – and a vector of Ca. Phytoplasma trifolii, the causal agent of potato purple top disease [Circulifer tenellus (Baker)]. Direct sequencing of 16S identified the two obligate endosymbionts of leafhoppers, ‘Ca. Sulcia’ and ‘Ca. Nasuia’, which are known to produce essential amino acids lacking in the leafhoppers’ phloem sap diet. About 57% of C. geminatus also harbored endosymbiotic Rickettsia. We identified ‘Ca. Yamatotoia cicadellidicola’ in Euscelidius variegatus, providing just the second host record for this endosymbiont. Circulifer tenellus harbored the facultative endosymbiont Wolbachia, although the average infection rate was only 13% and all males were Wolbachia-uninfected. A significantly greater percentage of Wolbachia-infected Ci. tenellus adults than uninfected adults carried Ca. P. trifolii, suggesting that Wolbachia may increase this insect’s ability to tolerate or acquire this pathogen. Results of our study provide a foundation for continued work on interactions between leafhoppers, bacterial endosymbionts, and phytoplasma

    Commercial sugar beet cultivars evaluated for rhizomania resistance and storability in Idaho, 2018

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and storage losses are serious sugar beet production problems. To identify sugar beet cultivars with resistance to BNYVV and evaluate storability, 30 commercial cultivars were screened by growing them in a sugar beet field infested with BNYVV in Kimberly, ID during the 2018 growing season in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. At harvest on 26-27 September 2018, roots were dug and evaluated for symptoms of rhizomania and also placed in an indoor commercial sugar beet storage building. After 136 days in storage, samples were evaluated for surface rot, weight loss, and sucrose loss. Surface root rot ranged from 17 to 81%, weight loss ranged from 22 to 32%, sucrose losses ranged from 44 to 87%, and estimated recoverable sucrose ranged from 803 to 7,207 lb/A. Given these response ranges, selecting cultivars for rhizomania resistance and combining this resistance with storability will lead to considerable economic benefit for the sugar beet industry

    What is new with rhizomania and curly top management and effects of these viruses on storage

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania is a serious yield limiting viral disease in sugarbeet first identified in California, USA in 1984. The disease has since spread to all major production areas in the United States. Rhizomania is caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and vectored by the plasmodiophorid (a fungal-like organism), Polymyxa betae. The virus survives inside the thick-walled resting spore of the vector in the soil, which can remain viable for many years. As a result, once a field is infested, using crop rotation and non-host crops will not be effective for controlling the disease. In the spring with near saturated soil conditions, the resting spore will germinate to release zoospores when in close proximity to sugarbeet roots. The zoospores will attach to the root and transmit the virus to the sugarbeet root. Therefore, the primary control measure will be to grow a sugarbeet cultivar with high resistance to BNYVV. Cultivars with the Rz1 resistance gene are available, but resistance breaking strains of the virus have been found in CA, CO, ID, MN, and OR. In the disease screening nursery in Kimberly, ID, check cultivars with just the Rz2 gene for resistance frequently exhibit symptoms on 10 to 40% of the plants, while cultivars with just the Rz1 gene tend to have just occasional blinking plants (plants with yellow narrow upright leaves). In the nursery and commercial fields, the Rz1 gene seems to be necessary to maintain an acceptable level of resistance, even if the cultivars contain other sources of resistance. Since resistance breaking strains are known to occur and resistance genes only allow for partial resistance to this disease, it would be wise to grow cultivars with additional sources of resistance to help protect Rz1. If inoculum levels are quite high, resistance in the cultivars may breakdown. Another control measure to consider would be to reduce irrigation frequency, so the soil surface dries between irrigations. Genetic engineering approaches have been studied for rhizomania, so hopefully in the near future cultivars with resistance based on transgenic strategies will become available. Curly top is another serious yield limiting viral disease for sugarbeet grown in semiarid production areas in the United States. Curly top is vectored by the beet leafhopper and can be caused by a number of Curtovirus species: Beet severe curly top virus (BSCTV; formerly CFH strain), Beet mild curly top virus (BMCTV; formerly Worland strain), and Beet curly top virus (BCTV; formerly Cal/Logan strain). Other Curtovirus species have been documented or at least proposed in recent years and some have been shown to occur on sugarbeet in other countries. A survey of the western United States showed BSCTV, BMCTV, and BCTV were present in sugarbeet (6). However, samples in this survey along with some collected in 2012 in Idaho show a virus different from these three was also present in sugarbeet. This “unknown” virus amplifies with the coat protein primers, but does not amplify with the species specific primers. This “unknown” virus is currently being investigated further at the USDA-ARS laboratory in Kimberly, ID. The curly top virus species are carried between growing seasons by adult female beet leafhoppers that overwinter on weeds in desert areas and poorly managed residential areas. The females lay eggs in the spring, leading to the start of approximately three generations under Idaho conditions. When the winter host plants desiccate in the spring, the beet leafhoppers move into crop areas carrying the curly top viruses. Most commercial sugarbeet cultivars in the western United States carry partial resistance to the curly top viruses, but the low to intermediate resistance carried by the cultivars tends not to be as protective prior to the eight-leaf growth stage. Thus, the earlier plants become infected the higher the yield loss. In-furrow, foliar, and seed-treatment insecticides have been used to supplement this host resistance. Based on studies by the USDA-ARS Kimberly sugarbeet program (1,9), the neonicotinoid seed treatments (Poncho, Cruiser, and NipsIt) were established as being effective at reducing curly top through early season control of the beet leafhopper vector. Root yield increases of 17% or more have been observed for Idaho (based on USDA-NASS statistics) and other states with semiarid production areas through the use of these neonicotinoid seed treatments (1,9). These seed treatments provide at least 59 days of beet leafhopper protection after planting along with early season control of leafminer and aphids (1,3,4,7,9). In 2012, research indicated that some labeled foliar insecticides (Asana¼ and Mustang¼) may be used to potentially extend this coverage period. However, foliar insecticides would not be recommended to replace the seed treatments, because of their short efficacy period. Currently genetic engineering approaches are being developed for curly top, so in the future cultivars with resistance based on transgenic strategies may become available. In storage, sugarbeet roots have been shown to lose an average of 0.2 to 0.3 pounds of sucrose per ton of roots per day when stored under ambient conditions, but losses can be as high as 0.5 pounds depending on cultivar. Thus, cultivar selection for storage could improve storability and reduce sucrose losses in storage (5). However, pathogen (2,5,7,8), pest (3), and environmental influences (over or under watering, frost, etc.) during the growing season can also negatively impact root storability. In particular, rhizomania (5,8) and curly top (7) have been documented to negatively influence root storability. Also, placing roots infested with Rhizoctonia solani and bacteria such as Leuconostoc into storage piles has been shown to reduce sucrose in neighboring healthy roots (2). Thus, keeping sugarbeet plants healthy and as stress free as possible during the growing season will also reduce losses in storage

    Experimental sugar beet cultivars evaluated for rhizomania resistance and storability in Idaho, 2018

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and storage losses are serious sugar beet production problems. To identify sugar beet cultivars with resistance to BNYVV and evaluate storability, 12 experimental cultivars were screened by growing them in a sugar beet field infested with BNYVV in Kimberly, ID during the 2018 growing season in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. At harvest on 26-27 September 2018, roots were dug and evaluated for symptoms of rhizomania and also placed in an indoor commercial sugar beet storage building. After 136 days in storage, samples were evaluated for surface rot, weight loss, and sucrose loss. Surface root rot ranged from 22 to 79%, weight loss ranged from 22 to 32%, sucrose losses ranged from 50 to 82%, and estimated recoverable sucrose ranged from 803 to 6,246 lb/A. Given these response ranges, selecting cultivars for rhizomania resistance and combining this resistance with storability will lead to considerable economic benefit for the sugar beet industry

    Experimental sugar beet cultivars evaluated for rhizomania resistance and storability in Idaho, 2017

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and storage losses are serious sugar beet production problems. To identify sugar beet cultivars with resistance to BNYVV and evaluate storability, 7 experimental cultivars were screened by growing them in a sugar beet field infested with BNYVV in Kimberly, ID during the 2017 growing season in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. At harvest on 2-3 October 2017, roots were dug and evaluated for symptoms of rhizomania and also placed in an indoor commercial sugar beet storage building. After 147 days in storage, samples were evaluated for surface rot, weight loss, and sucrose loss. Surface root rot ranged from 16 to 85%, weight loss ranged from 17 to 28%, sucrose losses ranged from 25 to 87%, and estimated recoverable sucrose ranged from 596 to 8,518 lb/A. Given these response ranges, selecting cultivars for rhizomania resistance and combining this resistance with storability will lead to considerable economic benefit for the sugar beet industry

    Improving Sugarbeet Storability

    Get PDF
    Storing sugarbeets, in piles, under ambient con- ditions, in production areas with mild climates, allows for longer and more productive factory campaigns. In southern Idaho, approximately one-third of the roots are directly processed, one-third are held in short-term storage, and one-third are held in long-term storage (greater than 90 days). Some beets in long-term storage will be held up to 150 days, leaving roots sus- ceptible to a number of negative influences. Extreme temperature fluctuations, excessive moisture, restricted air flow (snow, soil, weeds, and rotted roots), microbial development, res- piration rate, and buildup of impurities can all negatively impact sucrose recovery. In addition to disease and water-related problems in the field, wounding during harvest and transport will also negatively influence beet storability; therefore, saving sucrose in storage begins with cultivar selection for disease resistance and storability along with good field and harvest management

    Commercial sugar beet cultivars evaluated for rhizomania resistance and storability in Idaho, 2021

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and storage losses are serious sugar beet production problems. To identify sugar beet cultivars with resistance to BNYVV and evaluate storability, 26 commercial cultivars were screened by growing them in a sugar beet field infested with BNYVV in Kimberly, ID during the 2021 growing season in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. At harvest on 4-5 October 2021, roots were dug and evaluated for symptoms of rhizomania and also placed in an indoor commercial sugar beet storage building. After 132 days in storage, samples were evaluated for surface rot, weight loss, and sucrose loss. Surface root rot ranged from 12 to 53%, weight loss ranged from 14 to 23%, sucrose losses ranged from 28 to 68%, and estimated recoverable sucrose ranged from 766 to 9,622 lb/A. Given these response ranges, selecting cultivars for rhizomania resistance and combining this resistance with storability will lead to considerable economic benefit for the sugar beet industry

    Beet curly top resistance in two USDA-ARS sugar beet germplasm panels, 2023.

    Get PDF
    Two germplasm panels consisting of thirty sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) lines each from USDA-ARS pre-breeding programs were screened for resistance to Beet curly top virus (BCTV) alongside three commercial check cultivars [Detroit Dark Red (susceptible), HM PM90 (resistant), and SV2012RR (susceptible)]. The curly top evaluation was conducted at the USDA-ARS North Farm in Kimberly, ID which has Portneuf silt loam soil and had been in barley in 2022. The field was fall plowed with a Terrano chisel plow. In the spring, the field was fertilized (115 lb N and 140 lb P2O5/A), disked, and roller harrowed on 10 Apr. The germplasm was planted (density of 114,048 seeds/A) on 2 May. The plots were two rows 10-ft long with 22-in. row spacing and treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with six replications. The field was sprinkler irrigated, cultivated, and hand weeded as necessary. Plants were inoculated at the four- to six-leaf growth stage on 12 Jun with approximately six viruliferous (containing the following BCTV strains: California/Logan and Severe) beet leafhoppers (Circulifer tenellus Baker) per plant. The beet leafhoppers were redistributed two times a day during the first seven days by dragging a tarp through the field. Plots were rated for foliar symptom development on 12 Jul using a scale of 0 to 9 (0 = healthy and 9 = dead; Plant Dis. 90:1539-1544). Data were rank transformed prior to nonparametric analysis in SAS (Ver. 9.4) using the PROC MIXED procedure as described by Shah and Madden (Phytopathology 94:33-43). Mean separation was based on a PDIFF comparison with a probability cutoff of 0.05

    Experimental sugar beet cultivars evaluated for rhizomania resistance and storability in Idaho, 2022

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and storage losses are serious sugar beet production problems. To identify sugar beet cultivars with resistance to BNYVV and evaluate storability, six experimental cultivars were screened by growing them in a sugar beet field infested with BNYVV in Kimberly, ID during the 2022 growing season in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. At harvest on 3-4 October 2022, roots were dug and evaluated for symptoms of rhizomania and also placed in an indoor commercial sugar beet storage building. After 152 days in storage, samples were evaluated for surface rot, weight loss, and sucrose loss. Surface root rot ranged from 19 to 87%, weight loss ranged from 11 to 21%, sucrose losses ranged from 32 to 87%, and estimated recoverable sucrose ranged from 376 to 8,222 lb/A. Given these response ranges, selecting cultivars for rhizomania resistance and combining this resistance with storability will lead to considerable economic benefit for the sugar beet industry

    Commercial sugar beet cultivars evaluated for rhizomania resistance and storability in Idaho, 2019

    Get PDF
    Rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and storage losses are serious sugar beet production problems. To identify sugar beet cultivars with resistance to BNYVV and evaluate storability, 37 commercial cultivars were screened by growing them in a sugar beet field infested with BNYVV in Kimberly, ID during the 2019 growing season in a randomized complete block design with 6 replications. At harvest on 7-8 October 2019, roots were dug and evaluated for symptoms of rhizomania and also placed in an indoor commercial sugar beet storage building. After 145 days in storage, samples were evaluated for surface rot, weight loss, and sucrose loss. Surface root rot ranged from 10 to 68%, weight loss ranged from 14 to 25%, sucrose losses ranged from 22 to 72%, and estimated recoverable sucrose ranged from 2,442 to 9,769 lb/A. Given these response ranges, selecting cultivars for rhizomania resistance and combining this resistance with storability will lead to considerable economic benefit for the sugar beet industry
    • 

    corecore