3 research outputs found

    pH dependence of a 3<SUB>10</SUB>-helix versus a turn in the M-loop region of PDE4: observations on PDB entries and an electronic structure study

    No full text
    Available X-ray crystal structures of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE 4) are classified into two groups based on a secondary structure difference of a 310-helix versus a turn in the M-loop region. The only variable that was discernible between these two sets is the pH at the crystallization conditions. Assuming that at lower pH there is a possibility of protonation, thermodynamics of protonation and deprotonation of the aspartic acid, cysteine side chains, and amide bonds are calculated. The models in the gas phase and in the explicit solvent using the ONIOM method are calculated at the B3LYP/6-31+G&#8727; and B3LYP/6-31+G&#8727;:UFF levels of theory, respectively. The molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are also performed on the M-loop region of a 310-helix and a turn with explicit water for 10 ns under NPT conditions. The isodesmic equations of the various protonation states show that the turn containing structure is thermodynamically more stable when proline or cysteine is protonated. The preference for the turn structure on protonation (pH = 6.5-7.5) is due to an increase in the number of the hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions gained by the surrounding environment such as adjacent residues and solvent molecules

    pH Dependence of a 3103_{10}-Helix versus a Turn in the M-Loop Region of PDE4: Observations on PDB Entries and an Electronic Structure Study

    No full text
    Available X-ray crystal structures of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE 4) are classified into two groups based on a secondary structure difference of a 3103_{10}-helix versus a turn in the M-loop region. The only variable that was discernible between these two sets is the pH at the crystallization conditions. Assuming that at lower pH there is a possibility of protonation, thermodynamics of protonation and deprotonation of the aspartic acid, cysteine side chains,and amide bonds are calculated. The models in the gas phase and in the explicit solvent using the ONIOM method are calculated at the B3LYP/6-31+G* and B3LYP/6-31+G*:UFF levels of theory, respectively. The molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are also performed on the M-loop region of a 3103_{10}-helix and a turn with explicit water for 10 ns under NPT conditions. The isodesmic equations of the various protonation states show that the turn containing structure is thermodynamically more stable when proline or cysteine is protonated. The preference for the turn structure on protonation (pH = 6.5-7.5) is due to an increase in the number of the hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions gained by the surrounding environment such as adjacent residues and solvent molecules

    Subtype Selectivity in Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4): A Bottleneck in Rational Drug Design

    No full text
    Subtype selectivity of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) has been proposed to be the most salient feature for the development of drugs for asthma and inflammation. The present review provides an account of various strategies to overcome the side effects of the PDE4 inhibitors. Subtype selectivity and recent developments of molecular modeling approaches towards PDE4 were addressed using QSAR and docking, followed by a detailed structural analysis of more than three dozen available X-ray structures of PDE4B and PDE4D. Usually, the lack of a 3-dimensional structure of a target protein is a bottleneck for rational drug design approaches. However, in this case the availability of 39 X-ray structures along with co-crystals has not improved the therapeutic ratio of drugs through rational drug design approaches. The investigation of structures led to find significant variations in the M-loop region, which is the integral part of the active site of PDE4B and PDE4D. These differences can be accounted for by varying conformation of the Pro(430) residue and a Thr(436)/Asn(362) mutation in the M-loop that causes variations in adjacent residue properties and also the pattern of hydrogen-bonding interactions. The impact of the M-loop region on inhibitor binding has been further scrutinized by MOLCAD surfaces and hydrophobicity. These have shown that PDE4B is more hydrophobic in nature than PDE4D in the M-loop region. A review of the above aspects given the emphasis on a new PDE4 inhibitor which can access both metal and solvent pockets may possibly lead to ligands with enhanced potency. The lining of the Q2 pocket that involves the M-loop region may be considered for the design of potent subtype-selective inhibitors
    corecore