3 research outputs found
A Comparison of Oral Status of the Fourth-Year Students of Various Colleges at the University of Zagreb
Svrha: Svrha istraživanja bila je usporediti oralni status studenata Äetvrte godine StomatoloÅ”kog fakulteta te studenata Äetvrte godine ostalih fakulteta SveuÄiliÅ”ta u Zagrebu. Ispitanici i postupci: Istraživanjem je bilo obuhvaÄeno 78 studenata stomatologije i 78 njihovih kolega s ostalih fakulteta SveuÄiliÅ”ta u Zagrebu. Pregledi su obavljeni prema metodologiji i kriterijima SZO-a (WHO-a) stomatoloÅ”kim zrcalom, a parodontoloÅ”kom sondom Community periodontal index (CPI). Rezultati: ProsjeÄna vrijednost KEP-indeksa svih ispitanika bila 7,97 (s.d.= 4,48), a bila je veÄa kod muÅ”karaca negoli kod žena (p=0,043). Studenti stomatologije imali su prosjeÄan KEP 6,96 (s.d.=4,82), a oni s ostalih fakulteta 8,97 (s.d.=3,88), sa statistiÄki znaÄajnom razlikom (p=0,005). ProsjeÄan CPI statistiÄki se znaÄajno razlikovao (p=0.001) i kod studenata stomatologije je iznosio 1,91 (s.d.=2,40), a kod ostalih 2,99 (s.d.=2,23). VeÄina studenata ostalih fakulteta ( 66 %) treba, osim preventivnog tretmana, i konzervativno lijeÄenje za razliku od studenata stomatologije od kojih 83 posto ne treba nikakvo lijeÄenje ili treba samo preventivno. ZakljuÄak: Premda je pojavnost karijesa, parodontnih bolesti i potreba za stomatoloÅ”kim lijeÄenjem niža kod studenata stomatologije, razmjerno visoka vrijednost KEP-a u objema skupinama ispitanika upuÄuje na nužnost boljeg preventivnog djelovanja u druÅ”tvu. Zbog svijesti o oralnom zdravlju i preventivnim mjerama studenti stomatologije mogu biti pozitivan primjer kolegama s ostalih fakulteta.Objectives: To compare oral status of the fourth-year students of the School of Dental Medicine, and other fourth year students from the University of Zagreb. Materials and methods: Research included 78 dental students and 78 students of other colleges of the University of Zagreb. A standard dental check-up was performed following the WHOāprescribed methodology and criteria, and by using a dental mirror and community periodontal index (CPI) probe. Results: Mean DMFT of all examined subjects was 7.97 (s.d. = 4.48), with a higher value for males than females (p =0.043). The dental students had a mean DMFT of 6.96 (s.d. =4.82) and the non-dental students group DMFT of 8.97 (s.d. =3.88). This difference was statistically significant (p =0.005). Average CPI indices difference of the examined groups (dental students ā 1.91, s.d. =2.40; non-dental students ā 2.99, s.d. =2.23) was also statistically significant (p=0.001). The majority of non-dental students (66%) needed, in addition to preventive measures, a conservative dental treatment, in contrast to the dental-students group, where 83% required only preventive or no dental treatment at all. Conclusions: Although the incidence of dental caries, periodontal diseases and treatment need is lower in dental students, the relatively high value of DMFT indices in both groups indicates the need for better preventive measures. Due to an inherent increased awareness of oral health and preventive measures, the dental students could set a good example to their fellowstudents of other colleges
Comparison of Oral Hygiene Habits of the 4th Year Students of Different Faculties of University of Zagreb
Preddiplomsko obrazovanje mijenja percepciju oralno-zdravstvenih i oralno-higijenskih navika i stajaliÅ”ta studenata stomatologije. Svrha istraživanja bila je usporediti te navike i stajaliÅ”ta studenata Äetvrte godine StomatoloÅ”kog fakulteta i njihovih kolega s iste godine na ostalim fakultetima SveuÄiliÅ”ta u Zagrebu, kako bismo odredili opseg i važnost moguÄih razlika. Ispitanici i postupci: Sudjelovao je 151 student obaju spolova i to 79 sa stomatologije (Äetvrte godine) i 72 s ostalih fakulteta (Äetvrte godine). Svi su odgovorili na 21 pitanje iz prilagoÄenog upitnika prema Å palju o oralno-higijenskim navikama i stajaliÅ”tima. Podaci su nakon toga statistiÄki analizirani programskim paketom SPSS ver. 16,0. Rezultati: Rezultati su pokazali da postoji razlika izmeÄu dviju skupina te da studenti stomatologije imaju bolje oralno-higijenske navike i bolja oralno-zdravstvena stajaliÅ”ta od kolega s ostalih fakulteta. Bili su bolje poduÄeni u tehnici Äetkanja zuba, zube ÄeÅ”Äe Äetkaju, koriste se dodatnim sredstvima za održavanje higijene, rjeÄe imaju probleme s krvarenjem gingive te posjeÄuju stomatologa ÄeÅ”Äe nego njihovi kolege s drugih fakulteta. ZakljuÄak: Zbog svjesnosti o problemima oralnoga zdravlja i veÄeg znanja o preventivnim mjerama, studenti stomatologije mogli bi pozitivno pridonositi oralnom zdravlju svojih pacijenata i kolega i to ne samo educirajuÄi ih, nego i vlastitim primjerom.Undergraduate dental education changes studentsās perception of oral health, as well as oral hygiene habits and attitudes. Aim of this study was to compare oral hygiene and oral health habits and attitudes between 4th year students of dental medicine and 4th year students of other faculties of University of Zagreb in order to determine the possible extent and significance of differences. Material and Methods:
Total number of subjects was 151 which included 79 dental students (4th year) and 72 students of other faculties (4th year) of University of Zagreb, of both genders. Modified oral hygiene habits and attitudes questionnaire according to Å palj consisting of 21 questions was used. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS ver. 16.0 software. Results showed difference between two groups, where dental students had better oral hygiene habits and better oral health attitudes compared to their colleagues from other faculties. Dental students were better instructed in brushing techniques, brush more often, use additional means of oral hygiene, have lesser prevalence of gingival bleeding and visit dentist more often then their colleagues
from other faculties. Conclusion: Because of greater awareness of oral health problems and improved knowledge on preventive measures, students of dental medicine could positively contribute to the oral health of their patients and their colleagues by education, but also by their own example as a role ā model