Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Therapeutic outcomes following isolated transcatheter tricuspid valve repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is traditionally treated surgically, but isolated transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (ITTVR) offers a less invasive option. This study conducts a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate ITTVR outcomes in patients with TR. Database searches until March 2023 identified studies assessing ITTVR safety and efficacy in moderate/severe TR patients. Primary outcomes analyzed were severe TR, NYHA functional class improvement, and 6-minute walking distance. Meta-analyses used Risk ratio (RR) or mean difference with a random effects model. The review included 25 studies with 2421 patients. ITTVR improved NYHA functional class (RR: 3.262), reduced TR severity (RR: 0.303), and enhanced 6-minute walking distance (MD: +47.077 m). Echocardiographic parameters improved, including reductions in TR vena contracta, TR EROA, septolateral tricuspid annular diameter, RVEDD, RV FAC, and TAPSE. LVEF and PASP showed no significant changes. ITTVR improves functional outcomes and echocardiographic parameters in TR patient

Portal vein thrombosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and early cirrhosis-prevalence and risk factors

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequently associated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) with prevalence ranging from 25% to 50%. PVT is associated with poor prognosis, limiting the available therapeutic options for these patients. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for PVT in patients with HCC.Method: A retrospective analysis was performed on the prospectively collected data from January 2018 to March 2020. All patients with HCC discussed in our weekly multidisciplinary liver clinic were reviewed. Multivariate analysis was done to identify the independent risk factors for PVT in HCC patients. A p-value of \u3c0.05 was considered significant.Result: Of 316 patients, the prevalence of PVT was 31% (n = 98). Larger tumour size (p \u3c 0.001), raised Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP) level (p = 0.036) and higher Child-Pugh class (p = 0.008) were significantly associated with PVT. In 216 patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A), PVT was seen in 53 (24.5%) patients. Large tumour size (p \u3c 0.001) and higher AFP levels (p = 0.021) were independent risk factors.Conclusion: Overall prevalence of PVT in HCC was 31% whereas 24.5% in patients with early cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A). We identified various risk factors associated with PVT in our local population, highlighting the importance of early and regular screening of cirrhotic patients including Child-Pugh class A

Current practices and considerations for transcatheter mitral valve implantation based on risk stratification among patients with mitral valve regurgitation

Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of severe valvular disease occurring in developed countries, being caused either primarily on its own or secondary to cardiac disease. Surgical intervention is required for the correction of MR, which could include the replacement or repair of the affected valve. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) in selected patients is of increasing importance, especially after the success of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. TMVR can be divided into 3 types, that is, valve-in-valve for severe mitral valve disease, valve-in-ring for failed surgical repairs, and valve-in-mitral annular calcifications for mitral valvular disease with severe mitral annular calcifications and poor surgical criteria. The FDA approved Mitral valve-in-valve for patients with a high surgical risk in 2017, while valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annular calcifications are still currently under consideration. The SAPIEN M3 valve is relatively new with a trans-septal system, with a success rate of 86%, and no mortality in a 30-day outcome. The Cardiovalve is a bovine pericardium device that has a dual nitinol frame with a custom surgical design to facilitate TMVR. The AHEAD trial will evaluate whether the device is safe to use in a clinical setting and how effective it is for reducing MR in these patients. The trial consists of 30 patients in which the first 5 patients showed 100% technical success and a reduction of MR. This evolution of modern medicine has assisted in many different countries, including Pakistan where there is a higher prevalence of MR and hence, a greater need to apply TMVR in clinical practice

Mitral Valve Replacement: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low and High-Risk Patients.

Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of severe valvular disease occurring in developed countries, being caused either primarily on its own or secondary to cardiac disease. Surgical intervention is required for the correction of MR, which could include the replacement or repair of the affected valve. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) in selected patients is of increasing importance, especially after the success of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). TMVR can be divided into three types i.e., valve-in-valve (ViV) for severe mitral valve disease, valve-in-ring (ViR) for failed surgical repairs, and valve-in-mitral annular calcifications (ViMAC) for mitral valvular disease with severe mitral annular calcifications and poor surgical criteria. The FDA approved Mitral ViV for patients with a high surgical risk in 2017, while ViR and ViMAC are still currently under consideration. The SAPIEN M3 valve is relatively new with a trans-septal system, with a success rate of 86%, and no mortality in a 30-day outcome. The Cardiovalve is a bovine pericardium device that has a dual nitinol frame with a custom surgical design to facilitate TMVR. The AHEAD trial will evaluate whether the device is safe to use in a clinical setting and how effective it is for reducing MR in these patients. The trial consists of 30 patients in which the first 5 patients showed 100% technical success and a reduction of MR. This evolution of modern medicine has assisted in many different countries, including Pakistan where there is a higher prevalence of MR and hence, a greater need to apply TMVR in clinical practice

A Meta-Analysis on Incidence of Barotrauma in Patients with COVID-19 ARDS Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Barotrauma is a common complication in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) [...

Frequency of COVID‐19 vaccine side effects and its associated factors among the vaccinated population of Pakistan: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccine side effects have an important role in the hesitancy of the general population toward vaccine administration. Therefore, this study was conducted to document the COVID‐19 vaccine side effects in our population. Materials and Methods An online survey‐based, cross‐sectional study was carried out from September 1, 2021, to October 1, 2021, to document the side effects of the COVID‐19 vaccine among the general public. The questionnaire included participants’ sociodemographic data, type of vaccine, comorbidities, previous COVID‐19 infection, and assessment of side effects reported by them. Results The majority of the participants were <20 years of age (62.2%), females (74.9%), belonged to the educational sector (58.1%), residents of Sindh (65.7%), and were previously unaffected by COVID‐19 infection (73.3%). Sinovac (38.7%) followed by Sinopharm (30.4%) and Moderna (18.4%) were administered more frequently. Commonly reported side effects were injection site pain (82%), myalgia (55%), headache (46%), fatigue/malaise (45%), and fever (41%). Vaccine side effects were more likely to be reported with the first dose as compared to the second dose. On regression analysis, factors associated with occurrence of side effects included younger age (odds ratio [OR]: 6.000 [2.065–17.431], p < 0.001), female gender (OR: 2.373 [1.146–4.914], p = 0.020), marital status (OR: 0.217 [0.085–0.556], p < 0.001), graduate level of education (OR: 0.353 [0.153–0.816], p = 0.015), and occupation being either retired, freelancers, or social workers (OR: 0.310 [0.106–0.909]), p = 0.033). Previous infection with COVID‐19 (p = 0.458) and comorbidities were found unrelated (p = 0.707) to the occurrence of side effects. Conclusion The overall prevalence of local side effects was quite higher than the systemic ones. Further large‐scale studies on vaccine safety are required to strengthen public confidence in the vaccination drive