17 research outputs found

    Notes on non-archimedean topological groups

    Get PDF
    We show that the Heisenberg type group HX=(Z2⊕V)⋋V∗H_X=(\Bbb{Z}_2 \oplus V) \leftthreetimes V^{\ast}, with the discrete Boolean group V:=C(X,Z2)V:=C(X,\Z_2), canonically defined by any Stone space XX, is always minimal. That is, HXH_X does not admit any strictly coarser Hausdorff group topology. This leads us to the following result: for every (locally compact) non-archimedean GG there exists a (resp., locally compact) non-archimedean minimal group MM such that GG is a group retract of M.M. For discrete groups GG the latter was proved by S. Dierolf and U. Schwanengel. We unify some old and new characterization results for non-archimedean groups. Among others we show that every continuous group action of GG on a Stone space XX is a restriction of a continuous group action by automorphisms of GG on a topological (even, compact) group KK. We show also that any epimorphism f:H→Gf: H \to G (in the category of Hausdorff topological groups) into a non-archimedean group GG must be dense.Comment: 17 pages, revised versio

    Balanced and functionally balanced P-groups

    Get PDF
    In relation to Itzkowitz\u2019s problem [5], we show that a c-bounded P-group is balanced if and only if it is functionally balanced.We prove that for an arbitrary P-group, being functionally balanced is equivalent to being strongly functionally balanced. A special focus is given to the uniform free topological group defined over a uniform P-space. In particular, we show that this group is (functionally) balanced precisely when its subsets Bn, consisting of words of length at most n, are all (resp., functionally) balanced

    Minimality properties of some topological matrix groups

    Full text link
    We initiate a systematic study of topological minimality for some matrix groups defined on subfields of local fields. We show that the special upper triangular group SUT(n,F)SUT(n,F) is minimal for every local field FF of characteristic ≠2\neq 2. This result is new even for the field R\mathbb{R} of reals and it leads to some nice consequences. For instance, using Iwasawa decomposition, a new independent proof of the total minimality of the special linear group SL(n,F)SL(n,F) is given. This result, which was previously proved by Bader and Gelander (2017), generalizes, in turn, the well-known theorem of Remus and Stoyanov (1991) about the total minimality of SL(n,R).SL(n,\mathbb{R}). We provide equivalent conditions for the minimality and total minimality of SL(n,F)SL(n,F), where FF is a subfield of a local field. In particular, it follows that SL(2,F)SL(2,F) is totally minimal and SL(2k,F)SL(2^k,F) is minimal for every kk. Extending Remus--Stoyanov theorem in another direction, we show that SL(n,F)SL(n,F) is totally minimal for every topological subfield of R.\mathbb{R}. For some remarkable subfields of local fields we find several, perhaps unexpected, results. Sometimes for the same field, according to the parameter n,n, we have all three possibilities (a trichotomy): minimality, total minimality and the absence of minimality. We show that if nn is not a power of 22 then SUT(n,Q(i))SUT(n,\mathbb{Q}(i)) and SL(n,Q(i))SL(n,\mathbb{Q}(i)) are not minimal, where Q(i)\mathbb{Q}(i) is the Gaussian rational field. Moreover, if p−1p-1 is not a power of 22 then SL(p−1,(Q,τp))SL(p-1,(\mathbb{Q},\tau_p)) is not minimal, where (Q,τp)(\mathbb{Q},\tau_p) is the field of rationals equipped with the pp-adic topology. Furthermore, for every subfield FF of Qp,\mathbb{Q}_p, the group SL(n,F)SL(n,F) is totally minimal for every nn which is coprime to p−1.p-1.Comment: 21 page
    corecore