Severe Heart Failure and Large Left Ventricular Thrombus Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

Case Presentation A 58 year-old man who recently underwent a left superficialfemoral artery thrombectomy presented with a three-day historyof worsening exertional dyspnea and bilateral pedal edema. Hispast medical history is significant for coronary artery disease,myocardial infarction, and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.The patient initially presented to an outside hospital where hedeveloped ventricular tachycardia that warranted cardioversionthree times. Initial electrocardiogram showed inferior lead STsegment elevations and lateral lead ST depression

Preoperative Aspirin Use and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery Patients

Background: The effects of preoperative aspirin use on outcomes of cardiac surgery patients remain uncertain. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative aspirin use on major outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Methods: An observational cohort study was performed on consecutive patients (n = 4256) undergoing cardiac surgery in 2 tertiary hospitals. Of all patients, 2868 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into 2 groups: those taking (n = 1923) or not taking (n = 945) aspirin within 5 days preceding surgery. Results: Patients in the aspirin group presented significantly more with comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, previous myocardial infarction, angina, cerebrovascular disease, older age, and male gender. With propensity scores adjusted and multivariate logistic regression, however, the results of this study showed that preoperative aspirin therapy (vs nonaspirin) significantly reduced the risk of 30-day mortality (3.5% vs 6.5%, OR: 0.611, 95% CI: 0.391-0.956, P = 0.031), postoperative renal failure (3.7% vs 7.1%, OR: 0.384, 95% CI: 0.254-0.579, P < 0.001), dialysis required (1.9% vs 3.6%, OR: 0.441, 95% CI: 0.254-0.579, P < 0.001), intensive care unit stay (mean 107.2 vs 136.1 h, P < 0.001) and a composite outcome-major adverse cardiocerebral events (8.7% vs 10.8%, OR: 0.662, 95% CI:: 0.482-0.909, P = 0.011) in the patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, readmissions did not show a significant difference between the 2 groups (14.5% vs 12.8%, P = 0.944). Conclusions: Preoperative aspirin therapy is associated with a significant decrease in the risk of major cardiocerebral complications, renal failure, intensive care unit stay and 30-day mortality but does not increase the risk of readmissions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Evaluation of Latex Immunoturbidimetric Assay Thresholds and HIT in Cardiothoracic Surgery

Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common differential diagnosis in cardiothoracic surgery. The latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA) is an enhanced immunoassay that has recently been introduced for the detection of total HIT immunoglobulin and retains a higher specificity of 95% compared to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Objectives To investigate if a semiquantitative relationship exists between increasing LIA levels beyond the current positivity threshold and its correlation to positive serotonin release assay results in cardiothoracic surgery. Methods This was a multicenter, observational cohort of cardiothoracic surgery patients initiated on anticoagulation with heparin-based products. To conduct sensitivity and specificity analysis of LIA values, HIT positive was defined as a LIA value ≥1 unit/mL and HIT negative was defined as a LIA level <1 unit/mL. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to evaluate the predictive performance of the LIA. Results At manufactures’ cutoffs of ≥1.0 unit/mL, LIA sensitivity and specificity was 93.8% and 22%, respectively, yielding a false positive rate of 78%. At a higher cutoff of 4.5 units/mL, LIA sensitivity and specificity was 75% and 71%, respectively, yielding a false positive rate of 29% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.75 ( P  = .01; 95% confidence interval: 0.621-0.889). Bivalirudin was initiated in 84.6% of false positive LIA results. Conclusion This study suggests that the diagnostic accuracy of the LIA can be optimized by increasing the LIA positivity threshold. Proposing a higher LIA cutoff, may mitigate unwarranted anticoagulation and bleeding outcomes