キュレットを使ったシリコン栓(Endobronchial Watanabe Spigot; EWS®)による気管支塞栓術の有用性

藤田保健衛生大

Adverse reactions to mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 576 medical staff

OBJECTIVES: Various measures have been taken to curb the COVID-19 epidemic, but their effect has been limited. Vaccines are expected to make a definite improvement. In Japan, vaccination began in February 2021. However, there are very few reports of adverse reactions to mRNA vaccines for the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in Japanese people. Therefore, adverse reactions in 576 vaccinated medical staff at the author’s hospital were investigated. METHODS: The subjects were 576 medical staff who wished to receive the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. The first vaccination was performed with Pfizer’s new coronavirus mRNA vaccine (commercial name: Comirnaty intramuscular injection) from March 8 to March 15, 2021. The second vaccination was performed from March 29 to April 5, 2021, at an interval of more than 21 days from the first vaccination. RESULTS: Adverse reactions were seen in six subjects in the first vaccination. There was dyspnea in one subject, arthralgia in one subject, fever/malaise in three subjects, and left axillary pain and lymphadenopathy in one subject. One subject had a reaction at the vaccination site that needed to be addressed. At the second vaccination, adverse reactions were observed in 64 subjects. There was fever in 58 subjects, malaise in 21 subjects, arthralgia in 12 subjects, aching pain in 11 subjects, headache in six subjects, chills in six subjects, nausea in three subjects, redness in two subjects, dizziness in two subjects, hives in two subjects, swelling in two subjects, cough in one subject, and itching in one subject (some had multiple adverse reactions). Fever was observed in the range of body temperature from 37.4 to 38.9 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine were mild, and no serious anaphylaxis was observed. Vaccination was considered perfectly feasible if attention is paid to adverse reactions

A simple method of bronchial occlusion with silicone spigots (Endobronchial Watanabe Spigot; EWS) using a curette

Background: Bronchial occlusion with an Endobronchial Watanabe Spigot (EWS) has been shown to be useful in managing prolonged bronchopleural fistulas and intractable hemoptysis. EWS bronchial occlusion using a curette is less technically demanding. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical utility and simplicity of this method. Methods: A total of 18 consecutive patients (15 men, 3 women, aged 47–85 years) who underwent bronchial occlusion using an EWS from April 2012 to August 2014 were evaluated. The method involves sticking the tip of a curette into an EWS to the first joint, allowing it to be turned in any direction or at any angle. The time required to occlude the target bronchus was measured on routinely recorded digital videos. Other parameters evaluated included success rates, complications, and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 18 patients, 11 underwent bronchial occlusion for intractable pneumothorax, 5 for postoperative bronchopleural fistula, two for intractable empyema, and one for hemoptysis. Each patient required 1–7 EWSs (median 4). Target bronchi included the right upper ( n = 8), left upper ( n = 5), right lower ( n = 2), left lower ( n = 2), and right middle ( n = 1) bronchi. The success rate of EWS insertion into the target bronchus was 100%. Time per EWS occlusion ranged from 65–528 sec (median 158.5 sec). Of the 62 insertions, 36 (58.1%) were completed within 3 min, and 58 (93.5%) within 5 min. Successful outcomes were observed in 15 (83.3%) of the 18 patients. Conclusions: EWS bronchial occlusion using a curette is a simple method for managing intractable bronchopleural fistulas in daily clinical settings