28 research outputs found
Healthy eating at schools:How does a school food programme affect the quality of dietary intake at lunch among children aged 7-13 years?
ErnĂŚringsmĂŚssig evaluering af skolemads betydning for elevers kostindtag til frokost:En EVIUS rapport
Building school-based social capital through 'We Act - Together for Health' - a quasi-experimental study
Abstract Background Social capital has been found to be positively associated with various health and well-being outcomes amongst children. Less is known about how social capital may be generated and specifically in relation to children in the school setting. Drawing on the social cohesion approach and the democratic health educational methodology IVAC (Investigation â Vision â Action â Change) the aim of this study was to examine the effect of the Health Promoting School intervention âWe Act â Together for Healthâ on childrenâs cognitive social capital. Method A quasi-experimental controlled pre- and post-intervention study design was conducted with 548 participants (mean age 11.7Â years). Cognitive social capital was measured as: horizontal social capital (trust and support in pupils); vertical social capital (trust and support in teachers); and a sense of belonging in the school using questions derived from the Health Behaviour in School Children study. A series of multilevel ordinal logistic regression analyses was performed for each outcome to estimate the effect of the intervention. Result The analyses showed no overall significant effect from the intervention on horizontal social capital or vertical social capital at the six-month follow-up. A negative effect was found on the sense of belonging in the school. Gender and grade appeared to be important for horizontal social capital, while grade was important for sense of belonging in the school. The results are discussed in relation to We Actâs implementation process, our conceptual framework and methodological issues and can be used to direct future research in the field. Conclusion The study finds that child participation in health education can affect the childrenâs sense of belonging in the school, though without sufficient management support, this may have a negative effect. With low implementation fidelity regarding the Action and Change dimension of the intervention at both the school and class level, and with measurement issues regarding the concept of social capital, more research is needed to establish a firm conclusion on the importance of the childrenâs active participation as a source for cognitive social capital creation in the school setting. Trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN8520301
Effect of implementing school meals compared with packed lunches on quality of dietary intake among children aged 7â13 years
Process evaluation of implementation fidelity in a Danish health-promoting school intervention
Abstract Background âWe Actâ is a health-promoting school intervention comprising an educational, a parental and a school component. The intervention was implemented in 4 Danish public schools with 4 control schools. The objectives were to improve pupilsâ dietary habits, physical activity, well-being and social capital using the Investigation, Vision, Action & Change (IVAC) health educational methodology. The target group was pupils in grades 5â6. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implementation fidelity and interacting context factors in the intervention schools. Methods The Medical Research Councilâs new guidance for process evaluation was used as a framework. Data were collected concurrently and evenly at the 4 intervention schools through field visits (nâ=â43âdays), questionnaires (nâ=â17 teachers, 52 parents), and interviews (nâ=â9 teachers, 4 principals, 52 pupils). The data were analysed separately and via triangulation. Results A total of 289 pupils participated, and 22 teachers delivered the educational component in 12 classes. In all schools, the implementation fidelity to the educational methodology was high for the Investigation and Vision phases as the teachers delivered the proposed lessons and activities. However, the implementation fidelity to the Action & Change phase was low, and little change occurred in the schools. The pupilsâ presentation of their visions did not work as intended as an impact mechanism to prompt actions. The implementation of the parental and the school components was weak. The main context factors influencing implementation fidelity were a poor fit into the school-year plan and weak management support. Conclusions Although âWe Actâ was designed to comply with evidence- and theory-based requirements, IVAC and the health-promoting school approach did not result in change. The time dedicated to schoolsâ preparation and competence development may have been too low. This must be considered in future process evaluation research on health-promoting schools and by school health promotion administrators when planning future school interventions. Trial registration ISRCTN8520301