103 research outputs found

    Evolutionary ecology of opsin gene sequence, expression and repertoire.

    Get PDF
    Linking molecular evolution to biological function is a long-standing challenge in evolutionary biology. Some of the best examples of this involve opsins, the genes that encode the molecular basis of light reception. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, three studies examine opsin gene sequence, expression and repertoire to determine how natural selection has shaped the visual system. First, Escobar-Camacho et al. () use opsin repertoire and expression in three Amazonian cichlid species to show that a shift in sensitivity towards longer wavelengths is coincident with the long-wavelength-dominated Amazon basin. Second, Stieb et al. () explore opsin sequence and expression in reef-dwelling damselfish and find that UV- and long-wavelength vision are both important, but likely for different ecological functions. Lastly, Suvorov et al. () study an expansive opsin repertoire in the insect order Odonata and find evidence that copy number expansion is consistent with the permanent heterozygote model of gene duplication. Together these studies emphasize the utility of opsin genes for studying both the local adaptation of sensory systems and, more generally, gene family evolution

    Pleiotropy facilitates parallel adaptation in sticklebacks

    Get PDF
    Highly pleiotropic genes are predicted to be used less often during adaptation, as mutations in these loci are more likely to have negative fitness consequences. Following this logic, we tested whether pleiotropy impacts the probability that a locus will be used repeatedly in adaptation. We used two proxies to estimate pleiotropy: number of phenotypic traits affected by a given genomic region and gene connectivity. We first surveyed 16 independent stream‐lake and three independent benthic‐limnetic ecotype pairs of threespine stickleback to estimate genome‐wide patterns in parallel genomic differentiation. Our analysis revealed parallel divergence across the genome; 30%–37% of outlier regions were shared between at least two independent pairs in either the stream‐lake or benthic‐limnetic comparisons. We then tested whether parallel genomic regions are less pleiotropic than nonparallel regions. Counter to our a priori prediction, parallel genomic regions contained genes with significantly more pleiotropy; that is, influencing a greater number of traits and more highly connected. The increased pleiotropy of parallel regions could not be explained by other genomic factors, as there was no significant difference in mean gene count, mutation or recombination rates between parallel and nonparallel regions. Interestingly, although nonparallel regions contained genes that were less connected and influenced fewer mapped traits on average than parallel regions, they also tended to contain the genes that were predicted to be the most pleiotropic. Taken together, our findings are consistent with the idea that pleiotropy only becomes constraining at high levels and that low or intermediate levels of pleiotropy may be beneficial for adaptation
    corecore