3 research outputs found

    Ensure Follow-up for Functional Issues Post COVID-19

    Get PDF
    What\u27s the Problem? Patients post COVID-19 infection have functional limitations at home related to the multi-system effects of the infection, in addition to elevated risk for post-intensive care syndrome. Our goals were to ensure patients had the resources they needed to safely mobilize at home, ensure referral to appropriate agencies for home care and therapies, and provide guidance on return to life activities in the setting of the stay-at-home order, need to self-quarantine, and limited outpatient therapy options

    Screening Tool to Ensure Optimal Patient Care and Function Post COVID Diagnosis

    Get PDF
    We developed a screening tool of questions to determine which patients would benefit from outpatient PM&R visits after discharge from the hospital/ED that included: four questions looking at function, shortness of breath and cognition. Screening questions were created so a YES response triggers a referral to PM&R to assess functional and cognitive needs for the patient

    Improving Functional Outcomes for Patients with Low Back Pain by Ensuring the Use of Evidence-Based Practice

    No full text
    The worldwide estimated prevalence of people with low back pain was 577 million in 2017 and continues to grow. Low back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability in the US and the cost of low back pain has been shown to be up to $102 billion per year in the US. Research has shown that with the use of evidence-based practice there are improved patient outcomes as well as efficiency of performance. Historical barriers to the use of evidence-based practice include lack of time to critically review the literature, difficulty applying the guidelines and decreased self-efficacy in delivering the care. The aim of this project was that 70% of Jefferson outpatient physical therapists would provide a greater than 10% reduction in Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire (version 2) scores comparing three months pre-implementation with two months post implementation. The Six Sigma improvement process was used to coordinate and communicate the project. Active learning approaches included group mentoring and the creation of quick references guides that were used to improve the use of evidence-based practice and patient outcomes. The project demonstrated an increase in the use of additional outcome measures in line with current evidence but did not meet the goal of 70% of staff demonstrating an Oswestry score change of 10% or greater on average
    corecore