6 research outputs found
Telemetric Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure
Background: We present the application of a modern telemetric method that records and monitors Intracranial Pressure (ICP) over long periods in patients with possible intracranial hypertension.
Methods: A telemetric devise (Raumedic, Neurovent P-tel) was surgically implanted in six (6) patients. Three (3) patients with inconclusive diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, two (2) patients with possible diagnosis of aqueduct stenosis and one (1) patient with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. All patients underwent a 3-day ICP recording within the nursing unit. Two more recordings were obtained over a period of 2-6 months at outpatient base.
Results: All patients had an uncomplicated post-operative course. Analysis of the data excluded the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in two patients. Contrary in four patients data confirmed elevated ICP values and subsequently three of them underwent shunts implantation, while one patient refused further neurosurgical treatment.
Conclusions: The telemetric device could be safely implanted in selected patients. It could provide long-term ICP recordings, which are necessary to confirm diagnosis and guide to the appropriate treatment
Detection and Prevention of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is characterized by cognitive deficits alongside essentially preserved competence in activities of daily living [...
Self-rated and performance-based empathy in schizophrenia:The impact of cognitive deficits
Α Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating Brivaracetam in the Treatment of Epilepsies in Clinical Practice
Brivaracetam (BRV) is the latest approved antiepileptic drug. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of BRV in everyday clinical practice. In this retrospective, observational, multicenter study, data from epilepsy patients receiving BRV from January 2018 to July 2019 were analyzed. Patients with age ≥16 suffering from any type of epilepsy and having at least one follow up encounter after dose titration were included. 156 consecutive patients were included in the study. The mean age was 40 (16–84 years) and the mean duration of epilepsy was 21 years. Of the 156 patients, 81% were diagnosed with focal-onset seizures, 16% with generalized seizures, while 3% suffered from unclassified seizures. Nine patients received BRV as monotherapy as a switching therapy. At the first follow up visit, seizure cessation was achieved in 56 (36%) patients and the rate of ≥50% responders was 36%. Twenty four patients (15%) remained unchanged; six patients (4%) were recorded with increased seizure frequency, while the remaining 9% had a response of less than 50%. Twenty-six patients (17%) showed clinically significant adverse events, but none were life threatening. Brivaracetam seems to be an effective, easy to use and safe antiepileptic drug in the clinical setting
Comparison of the Greek Version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Older Adults
Objective: Cognitive screening instruments (CSIs) are essential for everyday practice. The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen, a short instrument designed to identify mild cognitive impairment, was recently translated into Greek (Qmci-Gr). The present study compared its diagnostic value against the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screen and examined its optimal cutoffs. Method: We recruited consecutive patients aged ≥55 years that presented with cognitive complaints from two outpatient clinics in Greece. The Qmci-Gr and MoCA were completed by all patients. Furthermore, they were assessed independently with a comprehensive flexible neuropsychological battery to establish a diagnostic classification. Results: In the current study, we assessed a total of 145 patients, with a median age of 70 years; 44 were classified as having Subjective Memory Complaints (SMC) but normal cognition, 32 with MCI and 69 with dementia. The Qmci-Gr had a higher accuracy compared to the MoCA in discriminating MCI from dementia, area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 versus 0.75, respectively; however, this finding was marginally significant (p = 0.08). Its accuracy was marginally higher for distinguishing SMC from dementia, AUC of 0.94 versus 0.89 (p = 0.03). However, Qmci-Gr presented a lower accuracy than MoCa in differentiating SMC from MCI, AUC of 0.76 versus 0.94 (p = 0.006). Conclusions: The Qmci-Gr has comparable diagnostic accuracy to the MoCA regarding MCI and dementia groups. Further research, with larger and more diverse samples, may be necessary to ensure generalizability