HOG PRICE FLEXIBILITIES AS RELATED TO CYCLE PHASES

Demand and Price Analysis,

The Effect of Recent and Futuristic Changes in Cotton Production Technology on Direct and Fixed Costs Per Acre, Mississippi, 2004

The introduction of genetically modified seed technology dramatically changed cotton production practices. Production systems based on reduced tillage and BtRR varieties improved net returns by $47.35 per acre (53%) when compared to systems based on conventional tillage and non-transgenic varieties. The impact of other technology induced changes are reported.Crop Production/Industries,

COSTS, YIELDS, AND NET RETURNS, COMMERCIAL NO-TILL COTTON PRODUCTION, MISSISSIPPI, 1999

An analysis of a 1999 sample of ten no-till producers indicates that over a reasonable range of cotton lint prices, no-till cotton production may result in larger net returns per acre than conventional tillage. However, the authors caution that additional analysis based on a larger sample of commercial no-till growers on better cotton soils is needed.no-till, spindle harvest, cost of production, yield, Production Economics,

DEFINING AND MEASURING RURALITY

Community/Rural/Urban Development,

THE SYSTEMS APPROACH -- RESEARCH OR RESEARCH MANAGEMENT

Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies,

ESTIMATING THE RELATIVE RURALITY OF U.S. COUNTIES

Community/Rural/Urban Development,

A TECHNIQUE TO ESTIMATE INPUT PRODUCTIVITY FROM FARM DATA

Productivity Analysis,

ALTERNATIVE COTTON PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Mississippi cotton farmers are adjusting to the current problem of low cotton price and high cotton production cost by modifying the way(s) they have traditionally grown cotton. This paper compares seven alternative production systems to the costs and returns associated with the conventional or traditional system labeled "solid cotton, 8-row equipment." Systems that combine wider equipment (less labor and machinery time per acre) with reduced tillage technology appear to offer opportunities to increase returns. Specific adjustments on individual farms will probably be dominated by the distribution of soil types.conservation tillage, ultra-narrow, no-till, skip-row, costs, returns, Production Economics,

THE IMPACT OF CURRENT COTTON PRICE AND PRODUCTION COSTS ON SKIP-ROW COTTON

According to conventional wisdom, low prices favor skip-row planting patterns while high prices favor solid planted cotton. Production costs have been trending upward for many years. Current high production costs have redefined the point at which a low price becomes a high price relative to skip-row versus solid planting pattern decisions. Growers considering a shift from solid to skip-row cotton must be able to produce high yields, more than 90% of the solid yield on a land acre basis.cotton, no-till yields, returns, Production Economics,

COSTS, YIELDS, AND NET RETURNS, COMMERCIAL ULTRA-NARROW ROW COTTON PRODUCTION, MISSISSIPPI, 1999

An analysis of a 1999 sample of 13 no-till producers indicates that over a reasonable range of cotton lint prices, ultra narrow cotton production may result in larger net returns per acre than conventional production practices. The largest percentage cost reduction is in fixed expenses. In general, total direct expenses per acre are also reduced, although UNRC usually results in higher seed and chemical expenses. UNRC has a lower total cost per pound compared to conventional cotton.UNRC, No-Till, cost of production, yield, stripper, harvest, Production Economics,