Intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment of the tibial component in the Triathlon knee

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Long term survivorship in total knee arthroplasty is significantly dependant on prosthesis alignment. Our aim was determine which alignment guide was more accurate in positioning of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. We also aimed to assess whether there was any difference in short term patient outcome.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A comparison of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment jig was performed. Radiological alignment of tibial components and patient outcomes of 103 Triathlon total knee arthroplasties were analysed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Use of the intramedullary was found to be significantly more accurate in determining coronal alignment (p = 0.02) while use of the extramedullary jig was found to give more accurate results in sagittal alignment (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in WOMAC or SF-36 at six months.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Use of an intramedullary jig is preferable for positioning of the tibial component using this knee system.</p

Acetabular impaction grafting in total hip replacement

Background and purpose: Acetabular impaction grafting has been shown to have excellent results, but concerns regarding its suitability for larger defects have been highlighted. We report the use of this technique in a large cohort of patients with the aim of better understanding the limitations of the technique. Methods: We investigated a consecutive group of 339 cases of impaction grafting of the cup with morcellised impacted allograft bone for survivorship and mechanisms for early failure. Results: Kaplan Meier survival was 89.1% (95% CI 83.2 to 95.0%) at 5.8 years for revision for any reason, and 91.6% (95% CI 85.9 to 97.3%) for revision for aseptic loosening of the cup. Of the 15 cases revised for aseptic cup loosening, nine were large rim mesh reconstructions, two were fractured Kerboull-Postel plates, two were migrating cages, one medial wall mesh failure and one impaction alone failed. Interpretation: In our series, results were disappointing where a large rim mesh or significant reconstruction was required. In light of these results, our technique has changed in that we now use predominantly larger chips of purely cancellous bone, 8-10 mm3 in size, to fill the cavity and larger diameter cups to better fill the mouth of the reconstructed acetabulum. In addition we now make greater use of i) implants made of a highly porous in-growth surface to constrain allograft chips and ii) bulk allografts combined with cages and morcellised chips in cases with very large segmental and cavitary defects

Femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. A follow-up of 540 hips

Between 1987 and 1999, 540 revision total hip replacements in 487 patients were performed at our institution with the femoral impaction grafting technique with a cemented femoral stem. All patients were prospectively followed for 2-15years post-operatively with no loss to follow-up. 494 hips remained successfully in situ at an average 6.7years. The ten year survival rate was 98.0% (95% CI 96.2 to 99.8) with aseptic loosening as the endpoint and 84.2% (95% CI 78.5 to 89.9) for re-operation for any reason. Indication for surgery and the use of any kind of reinforcement significantly influenced outcome (p<0.001). This is the largest known series of revision THR with femoral impaction grafting and the results support continued use of this technique

Periprosthetic Fractures About the Hip

Introduction: Little research has examined postrehabilitation functional outcomes of periprosthetic hip fractures. Predicted functional deficits and acceptable rehabilitation outcomes for these patients are not established. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes of periprosthetic fractures to matched patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Materials and Methods: Cases with periprosthetic fracture (PPF) were matched for age, gender, and surgeon to primary THA cases. Only patients who had completed at least 1 year of rehabilitation were included. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were calculated for all surviving cases with PPF and primary THA. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and the 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P value of <.05 was accepted as indicative of statistical significance. Results: We identified 25 patients with PPF. Three patients were unsuitable for functional assessment. Of the cases with PPF suitable for functional assessment, 14 (14/22) were male. The median age of the PPF and the THA groups was 71 years and 68 years respectively. The median WOMAC score for the PPF group was 26 (interquartile range [IQR] 5.5-49.5) compared to that of the primary THA group, 3 (IQR 2.0-24.5; P < .05). In the PPF group, there were 7 deaths and 3 of the surviving patients had significant complications. The median length of stay in the PPF group was 13 days (IQR 10.5-35) compared to the matched group of 5 days (IQR 5-8.5; P < .05). Conclusion: Patients with PPF have markedly poorer functional outcomes than age-, gender-, and surgeon-matched patients with THA as well as prolonged length of stay. Future research should target the identification of factors that may improve functional outcomes in this growing cohort

The effect of indirect admission via hospital transfer on hip fracture patients in Ireland

Background and aims: Current best practice states that hip fracture patients should undergo surgery within 48 hours to minimise perioperative complications. There are 10 emergency departments (EDs) in Ireland that receive hip fracture patients without a trauma and orthopaedic surgery unit on site. Idle periods and duplicated preoperative investigations can lead to a prolonged time to surgery. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of admission route on the time to surgery, length of stay and pressure ulcer development in patients who sustain a hip fracture in Ireland.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed, using 2013 and 2014 data from the Irish Hip Fracture Database. Age, gender and ASA grade were identified as confounders and adjusted for accordingly.Results: Of the 3893 hip fractures identified, indirect admissions via hospital transfer occurred in 8.6% of cases. Surgery was performed within 48 h in 72.0% of indirect admission and 73.7% of direct admission cases (p = 0.502). The length of stay was significantly prolonged for patients admitted via hospital transfer (25.6 compared to 19.6 days, p Conclusion: Delayed discharges post hip fracture have been shown to expose patients to increased perioperative morbidity and mortality rates, as well as reduced rehabilitation potential and less chance of returning home on discharge. This has significant cost implications for the health service and justifies the introduction of hospital bypass protocols for patients with hip fractures.</div

Irish Hip Fracture Database National Report 2013; better, safer care

Every year, in Ireland, over 3000 people are hospitalised with a hip fracture. The morbidity and mortality associated with this serious common injury and health care costs are high. International evidence has shown us the synergy of care standards, audit and feedback drive measurable improvements in hip fracture outcomes including mortality (National Hip Fracture Database, NHFD 2011) and cost of care.The IHFD is a clinically led, web based audit of hip fracture casemix, care and outcomes. It is backed by the Irish Gerontological Society (IGS) and the Irish Institute of Trauma and Orthopaedics (IITOS). The IHFD has been recording data since 2012. Data is collected through the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) portal in collaboration with the Healthcare Pricing Office (HPO). The National Office of Clinical Audit (NOCA) (Appendix 6) provides operational governance for the IHFD.</div